10-Year Facility Master Plan August 1, 2011 Introduction Approach - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

10-Year Facility Master Plan

August 1, 2011

2

Introduction

Approach Recommendations Ongoing process

3

Approach

Begins with Phase II Based on anticipated SPLOST funding Scores will be fluid Combined score and prioritization process

4

Combined Score

Combined Score Equation Example –

Brockett Elementary School

0.50(Physical Condition) + 0.40(Educational Adequacy) + 0.10(Technology Readiness) = Combined Score 0.50(49.90) + 0.40(72.21) + 0.10(76.70) + 61.50 24.95 + 28.88 + 7.67 + 61.50

Combined Score Examples

School Name Condition Suitability Technology Combined Score

SCORE WEIGHTING FORMULA 50% 40% 10%

Brockett ES 49.90 72.21 76.70 61.50 Smoke Rise ES 37.10 63.40 76.70 51.60 Stephenson MS 81.51 92.29 75.00 85.17 Stone Mountain HS 66.83 57.74 74.20 63.93

5

Priority Cut Points

Phase Years SPLOST Combined Score Guidelines 2 FY 2013 – 2017 IV < 54 Replacement 54 – 60 Limited Renovation 3 FY 2018 – 2022 V 54 – 60 Replacement School 60 – 65 Renovations 4 FY 2023+ VI+ 65 – 70 Renovations

6

Phase II (2013-17) Recommendations

• 1. Replace nine schools:
• 2. Renovate and provide additions to Redan High

School and Henderson Middle School.

• A. CHAMBLEE HIGH SCHOOL
• F. PEACHCREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
• B. MCNAIR MIDDLE SCHOOL
• G. PLEASANTDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
• C. AUSTIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
• H. ROCKBRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
• D. FERNBANK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
• I. SMOKE RISE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
• E. GRESHAM PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

7

Phase II (2013-17) Recommendations (con’t)

• 3. Consolidate DeKalb School of the Arts and DeKalb

Elementary School of the Arts

• 4. Limited renovations to critically deficient systems

at schools with scores between 54-60

• 5. Capital Renewal Program for the preservation of

assets includes:

• ROOFING
• HVAC
• ELECTRICAL
• PLUMBING
• ENVIRONMENTAL

8

• 6. Annual evaluation of enrollment data to

determine redistricting and consolidation needs

• 7. Develop district-wide plans for:
• 8. Reevaluation of combined scores in 2016

EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION HIGH ACHIEVERS AND OTHER MAGNETS, INCLUDING ARTS SPECIAL EDUCATION ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION

Phase II (2013-17) Recommendations (con’t)

9

Phase III (2018-22) & IV (2023 +) Recommendations

Renovate and/or replace schools based on

combined scores

Add capacity to facilities based on projected

enrollment

Relocate programs based on district-wide plan

10

Continue Capital Renewal Program for the

preservation of assets to include:

Continue annual evaluation of enrollment

data to determine redistricting and consolidation needs

Phase III (2018-22) & IV (2023 +) Recommendations (con’t)

• ROOFING
• HVAC
• ELECTRICAL
• PLUMBING
• ENVIRONMENTAL

11

Sample Master Plan Recommendations

(Super Cluster 3)

Anticipated Funding: Phase 2: SPLOST IV (FY 2013-2017) Phase 3: SPLOST V (FY 2018-2022) Phase 4: SPLOST VI & Beyond (FY 2023+) COMBINED SCORE CURRENT UTILIZATION REPLACE WITH NEW FACILITY RENOVATE ADDITION NEW SCHOOL IN AREA CLOSED SCHOOLS PROGRAM RELOCATION PHASE Super Cluster 3 – Elementary Schools Eldridge Miller ES* 57.88 97% 2 Hambrick ES* 68.52 81% 2 Marbut ES 85.53 92% Pine Ridge ES 60.99 61% 3 Princeton ES 94.42 96% Rock Chapel ES 75.89 62% Rockbridge ES 49.22 80% 2 Shadow Rock ES 85.24 92% Stone Mill ES* 71.77 90% 2 Stone Mountain ES* 50.61 95% 2 Wynbrooke ES 94.29 98% SC3 Elementary School Average 72.21 86% Super Cluster 3 – Middle Schools Champion MS** 57.52 92% 3 2 Redan MS 92.13 78% Stephenson MS 85.17 80% Stone Mountain MS 93.62 82% SC3 Middle School Average 82.11 82% Super Cluster 3 – High Schools Redan HS 57.99 114% 2 2 Stephenson HS 75.45 100% Stone Mountain HS 63.93 99% 3 SC3 High School Average 65.79 104% Super Cluster 3 Average 73.34 89%

*Phasing and extent of renovations dependent upon redistricting of new schools. ** Limited renovation to critical systems.

12

Conclusion

Ongoing process Questions

12