17 th Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies (AICIS 2017) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Amalia Madihie*, Angie Hart**, Suna Eryigit-Madzwamuse**, Salmah Mohamad Yusoff*, Emel Teksoz***, Siti Norazilah Mohd Said*, Jamayah Saili*, Rhian Adams**** Faculty of Cognitive Sciences & Human Development, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia* University of Brighton, United Kingdom** Mustafa Kemal University*** Newport Mind, United Kingdom**** Corres respon

• nding

ng auth thor:

• r: mamalia

ia@un unimas mas.my

17th Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies (AICIS 2017) Jakarta, INDONESIA 20-23 November 2017

2

Our Resilience Research Team

 Introduction on Study  Resilience Theories  Resilience The Magic Box Framework  Adolescent Identity

• The Spiritual Domain: Meaning of Life

 Methodology  Finding & Evidence  Implications  Conclusion  References  Acknowledgement

3

A research rch co colla laborati boration

• n started in 2016 on

Resilience Studies between three universities: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), MALAYSIA, Brighton University, UNITED KINGDOM, & Mustafa Kamel University, TURKEY – Integrate in COUNS NSEL ELLING LING PERSPECTI ECTIVE VE

4

Exploring Resilience Domains

The Magic Box

Exploring Cross- Cultural Aspects Developing Resilience Tool

Resilience Psychometric

As overcoming adversity,

whilst also potentially subtly changing, or even dramatically transforming (aspects of) that adversity (Hart et al., 2013b; 2016)

5

 A ‘bounce back’ state in individuals: adapt

and adopt after any adversities, setbacks, changes, and/or obstacles in life (Amalia Madihie, Sidek Mohd Noah, Maznah Baba & Wan Marzuki Wan Jaafar, 2015)

6

7

Cognitive Affective (Feeling) Behaviour

Theorist rist Defin initi tion n Theory ry Empirical al Support Implicati tion

• n for

Thera rapy py Rutter (2006) An interactive concept that is concerned with the combination

• f serious risk

experiences and a relatively positive psychological

• utcome

despite those experiences Isle of Wright and London study (Rutter, 1979) Comparison of children in two different settings Strong focus

• n

competence Consider genetic and environmental pathways to psychpatholog y Identify aspects of risk that contribute to causation Maintain challenge to developing coping skills Introduce turning points

 To refine the Resilience Framework (RF, Hart

et al., 2007) – to produce empiri irical cal evi viden ences es and d cultura ural dive vers rsiti ties es using communities of practice approach

 The RF is a strategic model that promotes

wellbeing by acting tactically about where to direct one’s efforts when building resilience (2007).

9

10

Protective Factor(s) Risk Factor(s)

The Magic Box

11

Accepting

• Starting point of children/families

Conserving

• Any good that has occurred hitherto

Commitment

• Working with them over a sensible

time period

Enlisting

• Appropriate others to help (referral)

 It is a comprehensive framework which

integrates both theory-driven and practice- based knowledge; and covers major domains

• f life including:

16

Basics Belonging Learning Coping Core Self

17

18

Illness-related Risk 1.Uncertainty in Illness 2.Disease and symptom- related distress Family Protective

• 3. Family Atmosphere
• 4. Family Support

Resources Social Protective

• 5. Social Integration
• 6. Health Care Resources

Individual Risk

• 7. Defensive Coping

Individual Protective

• 8. Positive Coping

Individual Protective: 9. Derived Meaning Outcome

• 10. Resilience

Outcome

• 11. Quality of Life

Hasse (2014)

OUTCOMES: Resilience & Quality of Life

Meaning (of Life)

Equanimity Perseverance

Self- Reliance

Existential Aloneness

19

 The scientific of human subjectivity (their view)  Q Methodology (Q) is a complete methodology

which involves technique (sorting), method (factor analysis), philosophy, ontology, and epistemology

20

 Malaysia: 100 samples  UK (England & Wales): 200 samples  Turkey: 100 samples

Inclusive Criteria:

1.

Both genders

2.

Aged between 13 – 17 years

3.

Well-literacy

21

 KID

IDSCRE CREEN EN-10 Index ex: This scale provides a unidimensional health related quality of life index for children and young people between 8 and 18 (Kidscreen Group, 2006)

 Multid

tidim imensional nsional Soci cial al Support

• rt Sca

cale: It is a 12 item scale that measures perceptions of social support adequacy from three specific sources, family, friends and a significant other (Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, & Farley,1988)

 Satisfa

sfaction ction with Life e Sca cale: : This five item scale aims to assess one’s global judgement of his/her satisfaction with life (Diener, Emmons, Larsen & Griffin, 1985)

22

 Stage

ge 1 (Q-sort sort analy lysis sis): ): A factor analyse of participants’ q-sorts was completed in order to identify similar orders of ranking/sorting.

• Each factor was then analysed through

interpretation of factors qualitatively In-depth

 St

Stage ge 2 (S 2 (Survey urvey analysis): lysis): Data from three surveys was investigated for their internal consistency.

Next, whether the factors derived from q-sort explained the variation in health related quality of life, social support and life satisfaction of the sample

23

 Eight factors were driven from the Malaysian

q-sorts.

 Items related to beliefs and Spiri

rituali tuality ty we were e ranked nked high ghest est in all factors whereas items related to Basics and Belonging were the differentiating elements of the factors.

24

Therefore, the findings suggested that basic and belonging domains are significantly more crucial compared o Coping, Learning and Core Self domains; and the need for a Spiritual iritual ele lement ment to building resilience is essential in Malaysians’ resilience building

25

 The non-clinical Resilience Assessment Tool

can be administered by counselling and school staff.

• They can therefore play an instrumental role in

identifying the domains of resilience needed to build the resilience of young people and in planning interventions.

26

 Resilient Therapy Intervention (Amalia

Madihie et al., 2015) is developed, experimented, a non-clinical tool, and ready to apply to all kind of individuals via psychoeducational approach in counselling and/or professional helpers

 The Resilience Scale (Malay version)

translated by Amalia Madihie et al., 2011 is validated and reliability checked- ready to be administratered

27

28

Spiritual-Resilience domain can be suggested as the sixth domain in the Magic Box Model a.k.a. Resilience Framework. The study has contributed empirical evidences to the field.

Short Term Grant, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), MALAYSIA F04/SGS/1480/2016/08 Brighton University, UNITED KINGDOM Mustafa Kamel University, TURKEY Newport Mind, UNITED KINGDOM 17th Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies, Jakarta, INDONESIA 20-23 November 2017

29

Q & A Session

30