4,000 years of regulatory theory and practice Exploring the main - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

4 000 years of regulatory theory and practice exploring
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

4,000 years of regulatory theory and practice Exploring the main - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Professor Jeroen van der Heijden | Chair in Regulatory Practice | School of Government | Victoria University of Wellington 4,000 years of regulatory theory and practice Exploring the main paradigm shifts in regulation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

4,000 years of regulatory theory and practice Exploring the main paradigm shifts in regulation

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com Professor Jeroen van der Heijden | Chair in Regulatory Practice | School of Government | Victoria University of Wellington

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Outline

  • Evolution of

regulation

  • Main paradigm shifts

since 20thC

  • Do charities need to

be regulated?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Evolution of regulation

  • Codex Hammurabi
  • Ca 1750 BC
  • System of

prescriptive rules and penalties for non-compliance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Evolution of regulation

  • Greek and Roman

influence (ca. 600 BC – 600 AD)

  • Further

codification of rules and penalties

  • Focus on

commerce, property and bodily harm

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Evolution of regulation

  • Middle ages

(ca. 600 – 1600 AD)

  • The body as

target of punishment

  • Deterrence

becomes a spectacle

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Evolution of regulation

  • Renaissance,

Enlightenment, and Early Modernity (16th – 19thC)

  • Birth of leniency
  • Punishment

becomes an administrative ritual to correct

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

  • For more than 3,700

years ‘regulation’ meant:

  • Hierarchy
  • Intrusive
  • Deterrence

based

  • Prescriptive
  • Static
  • One size fits all

In sum

  • Yet, from beginning of 20th Century onward,

regulatory friction becomes problematic

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Paradigm shift #1 Compliance motivations

  • Insights that people do not

just comply because they ‘fear’ consequences of non- compliance

  • Move towards compliance-

based regulation and positive incentives

  • Ca. 1970s
slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Paradigm shift #2 Risk regulation

  • Growing externalities (risks)

because of industrialization and globalization

  • Declining acceptance of fate
  • Call on governments to be

cost-effective (New Public Management)

  • Ca. 1980s
slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Paradigm shift #3 Responsive regulation

  • Mixing incentives
  • Facilitating first, friction later
  • Role of street-level

bureaucrat essential to achieve compliance

  • Ca. 1990s
slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Paradigm shift #4 Behavioural insights

  • Growing critique to neo-

classical model of rationality

  • Heuristics and biases shape

behavior

  • ‘Nudge’ choice rather than

limit choice

  • Ca. 2000s
slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Paradigm shift #5 Better regulation

  • Systems thinking
  • Horizontal coordination
  • Collaboration and

deliberation in rule-making and implementation

  • Regulatory review and

update

  • Ca. 2010s
slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

  • Over the last 50

years ‘regulation’ has become to mean:

  • Panarchy
  • Collaborative
  • Mixed incentives
  • Goal based
  • Flexible
  • Tailored

In sum

  • Response to ongoing calls for less regulatory

friction and more regulatory facilitation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Should charities be regulated?

  • Regulation is a specialism
slide-15
SLIDE 15

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Should charities be regulated?

  • It requires regulatory experts

(topical) and regulatory generalists (system-wide)

  • It requires a regulatory

profession, with shared norms and values

  • It requires an holistic vision
  • f the regulatory system, the

role of actors and

  • rganizations in it, and the

ethics of individuals at all levels of the system

slide-16
SLIDE 16

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Should charities be regulated?

  • Regulation is a specialism
  • In my opinion, absolutely (for

all of the above reasons)

  • It remains at question,

however, whether the NZ government is capable to regulate charities well in today’s complex regulatory environment

slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.com

Thank you

Professor Jeroen van der Heijden

Chair in Regulatory Practice School of Government Victoria University of Wellington Honorary Professor School of Regulation and Global Governance Australian National University

jeroen.vanderheijden@vuw.ac.nz www.RegulatoryFrontlines.wordpress.co m