A 2-categorical Analysis of Complementary Families and Quantum Key - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a 2 categorical analysis of complementary families and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A 2-categorical Analysis of Complementary Families and Quantum Key - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A 2-categorical Analysis of Complementary Families and Quantum Key Distribution Krzysztof Bar 1 Jamie Vicary 2 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford 2 Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A 2-categorical Analysis of Complementary Families and Quantum Key Distribution

Krzysztof Bar 1 Jamie Vicary 2

1Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford 2Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore

and Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford

QPL Kyoto, 6th June 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information A

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems A B

S

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems A B

S

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics A B

S S′ α

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics A B

S S′ α

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition A B C

S S′ T α

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition A B C

S S′ T α

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition Vertical composition A B C

S S′ T S′′ α γ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition Vertical composition A B C

S S′ S′′ T α γ

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition Vertical composition Tensor product A B C

S S′ S′′ T α γ δ

D E F

U U′ U′′

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction

2-categories allow us to reason about quantum measurements in a more elegant way and with fewer equations Graphical calculus: 0-cells Regions Classical information 1-cells Lines Quantum systems 2-cells Vertices Quantum dynamics Horizontal composition Vertical composition Tensor product A B C

S S′ S′′ T α γ δ

D E F

U U′ U′′

Semantics given by the symmetric monoidal 2-category 2Hilb that has: 0-cells given by natural numbers 1-cells - matrices whose entries are finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces 2-cells given by matrices whose entries are linear maps

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob

.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob

Creation of entangled state .

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob

Creation of entangled state alice: choose a random basis bob: choose a random basis .

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob

Creation of entangled state alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled measurement bob: choose a random basis bob: controlled measurement

basis information key information

.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob

Creation of entangled state alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled measurement bob: choose a random basis bob: controlled measurement alice, bob: compare bases

basis information key information

.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Quantum key distribution via E91

Vertical 2-cell composition corresponds to temporal composition. Horizontal 2-cell composition corresponds to spatial composition time alice bob

Creation of entangled state alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled measurement bob: choose a random basis bob: controlled measurement alice, bob: compare bases By choosing a 2-category these diagrams are interpreted in, we choose the theory of Physics to work in. Quantum theory is modelled by 2Hilb.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob

Creation of entangled state alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled measurement bob: choose a random basis bob: controlled measurement alice, bob: compare bases

basis information key information

.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob eve

Creation of entangled state eve: choose a random basis alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled measurement eve: intercept and measure eve: copy measurement result eve: prepare fake system bob: choose a random basis bob: controlled measurement alice, bob: compare bases

basis information key information

.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob eve

Creation of entangled state eve: choose a random basis alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled measurement eve: intercept and measure eve: copy measurement result eve: prepare fake system bob: choose a random basis bob: controlled measurement alice, bob: compare bases

basis information key information

.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob eve

alice: choose random bit alice: copy the bit alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled preparation eve: choose a random basis eve: intercept system eve: copy measurement result eve: prepare counterfeit system bob: choose a random basis alice, bob: compare bases

basis information key information

.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob eve

Creation of entangled state eve: choose a random basis alice: choose a random basis alice: controlled measurement eve: intercept and measure eve: copy measurement result eve: prepare fake system bob: choose a random basis bob: controlled measurement alice, bob: compare bases

basis information key information

.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob eve = Ps

basis information key information

.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob eve Pd = Ps +

basis information key information

.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Quantum key distribution via E91

alice bob eve ψ Pd = Ps +

. This is the QKD equation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Complementarity of families of controlled

  • perations

Pd

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Complementarity of families of controlled

  • perations

Pd L R

L measurement Results copied L measurement R measurement

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Complementarity of families of controlled

  • perations

Pd L R

L measurement Results copied L measurement R measurement

= Pd

n L

R

Random data L measurement

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Complementarity of families of controlled

  • perations

Pd L R

L measurement Results copied L measurement R measurement

= Pd

n φ

L R

Random data L measurement Controlled phase φ

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Complementarity of families of controlled

  • perations

Controlled complementarity A family of controlled operations is complementary, if there exists a phase ψ such that: Pd L R

L measurement Results copied L measurement R measurement

= Pd

n φ

L R

Random data L measurement Controlled phase φ

Theorem Solutions to the controlled complementarity equation in 2Hilb correspond to families of mutually unbiased bases

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Complementarity of families of controlled

  • perations

Controlled complementarity A family of controlled operations is complementary, if there exists a phase ψ such that: Pd L R

L measurement Results copied L measurement R measurement

= Pd

n φ

L R

Random data L measurement Controlled phase φ

Theorem Solutions to the controlled complementarity equation in 2Hilb correspond to families of mutually unbiased bases Theorem The QKD equation and the Controlled complementarity equation are topologically equivalent

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Summary

What is the significance of this work?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Summary

What is the significance of this work? Completely syntactic proof of QKD ⇔ MUB equivalence that uses

  • nly the logical structure
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Summary

What is the significance of this work? Completely syntactic proof of QKD ⇔ MUB equivalence that uses

  • nly the logical structure

Also in the paper: Logical correctness proof of Klappenecker and Roettler’s construction of a solution to the Mean King’s problem from a family

  • f mutually unbiased bases
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Summary

What is the significance of this work? Completely syntactic proof of QKD ⇔ MUB equivalence that uses

  • nly the logical structure

Also in the paper: Logical correctness proof of Klappenecker and Roettler’s construction of a solution to the Mean King’s problem from a family

  • f mutually unbiased bases

Future directions: Application to other quantum protocols Nonstandard, ’classical’ models

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Summary

What is the significance of this work? Completely syntactic proof of QKD ⇔ MUB equivalence that uses

  • nly the logical structure

Also in the paper: Logical correctness proof of Klappenecker and Roettler’s construction of a solution to the Mean King’s problem from a family

  • f mutually unbiased bases

Future directions: Application to other quantum protocols Nonstandard, ’classical’ models

Thank you!