A Comparison of the Thermal Stability Factors in Single Layer and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a comparison of the thermal stability factors in single
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Comparison of the Thermal Stability Factors in Single Layer and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Comparison of the Thermal Stability Factors in Single Layer and Exchange- Coupled Longitudinal Media V.G. Voznyuk, W.D. Doyle, MINT Center and Physics and Astronomy The University of Alabama E.N. Abarra, Fujitsu Laboratories . NSF (Grant


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

A Comparison of the Thermal Stability Factors in Single Layer and Exchange- Coupled Longitudinal Media

V.G. Voznyuk, W.D. Doyle, MINT Center and Physics and Astronomy The University of Alabama E.N. Abarra, Fujitsu Laboratories.

NSF (Grant No. ECS-008534) and made use of the NSF MRSEC Shared Facilities (Grant No. DMR-9809423) MINT Fall Review, November 2001.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Motivation

  • Thermal stability problem: the straightforward solution of

increasing the anisotropy energy is limited by the write field capabilities of currently available heads and is thought to limit the potential areal density of longitudinal media.

  • Recently proposed1,2 antiferromagnetically exchange

coupled multi-layers (synthetic ferrimagnetic media, SFM) are believed to extend the areal densities beyond the predicted superparamagnetic limit for single layer media (SLM).

1 E. N. Abarra et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2581 (2000) 2 Eric E. Fullerton, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2748 (2001)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Description of the Samples

Sample t1 (nm) t2 (nm) t2-t1 (nm) SL6 6 SL8 8 SL12 12 SF7 5 12 7 SF9 5 14 9 SF12 4 16 12

Ru layer: 0.7 nm

Major advantage: low Mrt ! MrtSFM = Mrt2 – Mrt1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Typical Hysteresis Loop and Remanent Magnetization curve

  • Hysteresis loops confirm

antiferromagnetic coupling

  • f the layers (arrows

represent magnetization configuration)

  • No difference in the shape of

the remanent magnetization curve from that of a single- layer media.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

  • MstSFM data points laying

below the Mst(t) line predicted from the SLM data suggest the saturation field is not strong enough to fully align the moments in both layers.

  • MrtSFM values are above the

SLM data. This suggests, the moments are not fully antiparallel at remanence.

  • Linear growth of the Mst

with thickness for SLM.

SLM: t = t1, SFM: t = t1 + t2 for Mst and t = t2 - t1 for Mrt.

Mst, Mrt

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Time-Dependent Remanent Coercivity

Measured: AGM

Sample Mrt, (memu /cm2) HCR (Oe) [t=100s] H0 (Oe) KV/ kT SL6 0.16 700 1770 55 SL8 0.23 1090 2650 57 SL12 0.32 1980 4140 68 SF7 0.23 2470 4860 74 SF9 0.30 2780 5040 86 SF12 0.33 3000 5080 98

Sharrock’s formula 3:

3 M. P. Sharrock, J.Appl. Phys. 76, 6314 (1994)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Intrinsic Switching Field (H0)

  • The increase in Ho in the

SLM samples with thickness is due to the change of the anisotropy energy density K.4

  • The values of H0 for

SFM do not change significantly with t indicating that the structure of the top layer varies only slightly.

SLM: t = t1, SFM: t = t1 + t2 for Mst and t = t2 - t1 for Mrt.

4 A. Ajan, Fujitsu Laboratories, private communication

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

KV/kT

  • Small slope for SLM:

Switching volume V increases with the decrease of t faster than K decreases. 5

  • Greater slope and a non-zero

intercept for the SFM.

  • At zero effective magnetic

layer thickness the physical thicknesses of the component layers may be far from zero.

  • The KV/kT of an SFM is

determined primarily by the top layer properties !

SLM: t = t1, SFM: t = t1 + t2 for Mst and t = t2 - t1 for Mrt.

5 G. Lauhoff, T. Suzuki, J.Appl. Phys. 87, 5702 (2000)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Conclusions

  • Time-dependent remanent coercivity data confirms

that the KV/kT of the synthetic ferrimagnetic media is determined primarily by the properties of the top layer.

  • A significant improvement in thermal stability of the

synthetic ferrimagnetic media with respect to that of a single layer media of the same effective magnetic layer thickness without serious increase in switching field is confirmed.