a randomised controlled trial of high or low volume

A randomised controlled trial of high or low volume initiation and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A randomised controlled trial of high or low volume initiation and rapid or slow advancement of milk feeds for infants 1000 g (HREC 283/2011) MS Raban 1 , S Santhakumaran 2 , Q Keraan 1 , Y Joolay 1 , S Uthaya 2 , AR Horn 1 , N Modi 2 , MC


  1. A randomised controlled trial of high or low volume initiation and rapid or slow advancement of milk feeds for infants ≤ 1000 g (HREC 283/2011) MS Raban 1 , S Santhakumaran 2 , Q Keraan 1 , Y Joolay 1 , S Uthaya 2 , AR Horn 1 , N Modi 2 , MC Harrison 1 1. Department of Neonatal Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town 2. Imperial College ,London, United Kingdom SCAH Research Day 28 October 2014

  2. Introduction • Optimal enteral feeding regimen has not been established • Early studies - early introduction and rapid advancement of enteral feeds may be involved in pathogenesis of NEC • Delay in attaining full enteral nutrition may lead to suboptimal growth and assoc neurodevelopmental delay at 18 – 22 months • Systematic review suggests rapid advancement of feeds is safe • No increase in risk for NEC

  3. Introduction Lango et al described the growth velocity in ELBW infants managed at GSH nursery Mean Growth Velocity was 14.0 g/kg/day

  4. Objectives • Examine the outcomes of both the initiating and advancement enteral feed volumes in infants weighing ≤ 1000 g • Establish safety and efficacy of commencing exclusive breast milk feeds at 24ml/kg/day on the day of birth and advancing feeds at 36ml/kg/day

  5. Methods • 2×2 factorial designed RCT • Infants weighing ≤1000g were randomized to 1 of 4 groups • Recruitment period August 2011 – February 2013 • The primary outcome: Time to attain a weight of 1500g

  6. Results

  7. Assessed for eligibility n=214 Excluded n=14 - Declined participation n=5 Enrolment - Other n=3 - Missed n=2 - Not meeting inclusion criteria n =2 - Excluded for medical reasons n=2 Randomised Allocation n=200 Low/slow n=51 Low/rapid n=47 High/slow n=52 High/rapid n=50 Follow-up 13 deaths (25.5%) 19 deaths (40.4%) 16 deaths (30.8%) 14 deaths (28.0%) 38 discharges (74.5%) 28 discharges (59.6%) 36 discharges (69.2%) 36 discharges (72.0%) Discontinued = 0 Discontinued = 0 Discontinued = 0 Discontinued = 0 Analysis Analysed n=51 Analysed n=47 Analysed n=52 Analysed n=50

  8. Patient characteristics

  9. Time to attain 1500 g

  10. Time to regain birth weight

  11. Time to discharge

  12. Morbidity and Mortality

  13. Discussion - Limitations • Not powered to detect differences in NEC and mortality • The nature of the intervention precluded blinding • The study did not include long-term follow-up • Resource constraints prohibited the concurrent use of PN

  14. Conclusion • Higher initiation feed volumes and larger daily feed increments in infants ≤ 1000 g - well tolerated - increased early weight gain - reduced hospital stay - Mortality and feed-related morbidity, including NEC did not appear to be increased • Justification for larger studies to address the impact on NEC and other adverse outcomes.

  15. Thank You

Recommend


More recommend


Explore More Topics

Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.