A Response to Christopher Hodges Regulatory Powers and Enforcement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a response to christopher hodges regulatory powers and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Response to Christopher Hodges Regulatory Powers and Enforcement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Response to Christopher Hodges Regulatory Powers and Enforcement Colin Scott Principal, UCD College of Social Sciences and Law Professor of EU Regulation and Governance University College Dublin colin.scott@ucd.ie Law Reform Commission


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An Coláiste Ollscoile, Baile Átha Cliath University College Dublin

A Response to Christopher Hodges Regulatory Powers and Enforcement

Colin Scott

Principal, UCD College of Social Sciences and Law Professor of EU Regulation and Governance University College Dublin colin.scott@ucd.ie

Law Reform Commission Annual Conference November 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Response

  • 1. Agree that regulation is tricky because it is about changing behaviours.
  • 2. Agree also that collaborative governance is promising

– search for capacity and engage key actors with the social, market and legal pressures which promote compliance.

  • 3. However, collaborative modes require highly skilled regulators,

paying attention to all dimensions of a regulatory regime, including availability of higher level penalties.

  • 4. Effective mplementation is technically and culturally challenging and

requires learning and iteration.

  • 5. Where collaborative modes are not well overseen/implemented, businesses

have opportunities for shirking – see Honohan Report on Financial Crisis 2010.

  • 6. Argues for more flexible toolkit, but also highly skilled regulatory cadre

and recognition of wider range of actors in regulatory regimes.

  • 7. Law reform by itself insufficient. Requires oversight of regulatory

management and practice and new forms of engagement with firms.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Black’s Conceptualisation

‘regulation is the sustained and focused attempt to alter the behaviour of others according to defined standards or purposes with the intention of producing a broadly identified outcome or

  • utcomes which may involve mechanisms of

standard-setting, information-gathering and behaviour-modification.’ (p20)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Regulation

Feedback (information gathering) Correction (behaviour modification) Norms (standard- setting)

  • Rules/Principles
  • Primary/Secondary Legislation
  • Hard/Soft Law
  • Associational/Bilateral Contracts
  • Technical Standards
  • Self-Report
  • Inspection
  • Certification
  • Audit
  • Complaints
  • Whistleblowing
  • Bounties
  • License Revocation
  • Criminal Sanctions
  • Admin Penalties
  • Warnings
  • Advice
  • Education
  • Taxes
  • Private Rights
  • Scoreboards
  • Media
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Responsive Regulation Really Responsive Risk –Based Regulation Nudges Meta-Regulation

C

Self- Regulation eg CSR employment contracts

D

Social/market pressures eg Boycotts Buycotts Social Licence to operate

A – Target of Regulation – Firm, Govt Agency, NGO, Individuals B – Government (agency and/or department) C – Contracting Party (firm or government), Association (trade, sporting, etc) D – Third parties – eg consumers, NGOs, investors, competitors, employees

A

Contract Eg private standards regimes, monitored, enforced through contracts, (individuated and collective (associations)) Gatekeepers, eg insurance, banking, immigration

B

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Enforcement Network

Agency Department European Commission Agency Enforcement Bodies: Garda Síochána DPP Courts Businesses Consumers, Consumer Groups NGOs, Trade Unions

Network Actions 1. Setting norms

  • a. Legislation
  • b. Compliance

Programmes 2. Monitoring a. Agency oversight b. Sharing Information/ Experience c. Whistleblowing and complaints 3. Enforcement a. Warnings b. Contract withdrawal c. Civil Proceedings d. Administrative Sanctions e. Agency Prosecution f. Cross-Sanctioning

National Agencies Overseas/Networks Professional Service Providers, Accountants, Lawyers Media