A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Georg Schollmeyer Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU) A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View on Data Imprecision for the Case of Stochastic Dominance for Interval-Valued Data
Georg Schollmeyer Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU) A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View on Data Imprecision for the Case of Stochastic Dominance for Interval-Valued Data
Working Group Methodological Foundations of Statistics and their Applications: • Thomas Augustin • Eva Endres • Cornelia Fuetterer • Malte Nalenz • Aziz Omar • Patrick Schwaferts • Georg Schollmeyer 1 Our Working Group
A Short Note on the Equivalence of the Ontic and the Epistemic View on Data Imprecision for the Case of Stochastic Dominance for Interval-Valued Data 2
• Epistemic view: A set-valued data point represents an imprecise observation of a precise, but not directlyobservable data point of interest. • Ontic view: A set-valued data point is understood as a precise observation of somethinmg that is ’imprecise’ in nature. 3 Ontic vs Epistemic Data Imprecision
4 First Order Stochastic Dominance 1a: univariate case amssymb amsmath X ≤ SD Y ⇐ ⇒ ∀ c ∈ R : F X ( c ) ≥ F Y ( c ) ⇐ ⇒ ∀ c ∈ R : P ( X ≥ c ) ≤ P ( Y ≥ c ) F X F Y
5 First Order Stochastic Dominance 1b: univariate case, sample analogue amsmath amssymb ⇒ ∀ c ∈ R : ˆ F X ( c ) ≥ ˆ F Y ( c ) X ≤ ˆ SD Y ⇐ ⇒ ∀ c ∈ R : ˆ P ( X ≥ c ) ≤ ˆ ⇐ P ( Y ≥ c ) F X F Y
6 b (A set b b b b b b b b b b First Order Stochastic Dominance 2: bivariate case amsmath amssymb ⇒ ∀ U ⊆ R 2 upset : ˆ P ( X ∈ U ) ≤ ˆ X ≤ ˆ SD Y ⇐ P ( Y ∈ U ) U ⊆ R 2 is called upset iff ∀ x ∈ U , y ∈ R 2 s.t. y i ≥ x i ( i = 1 , 2 ) = ⇒ y ∈ U )
7 b b b b b b b b b b b First Order Stochastic Dominance 2: bivariate case amsmath amssymb ⇒ ∀ U ⊆ R 2 upset : ˆ P ( X ∈ U ) ≤ ˆ X ≤ ˆ SD Y ⇐ P ( Y ∈ U )
8 b b b b b b b b b First Order Stochastic Dominance 3: general poset-valued case • Given a poset ( V , ≤ ) , a subset U ⊆ V is called upset iff x ∈ U , y ≥ x = ⇒ y ∈ U . ⇒ ∀ U ⊆ R 2 upset : ˆ P ( X ∈ U ) ≤ ˆ P ( Y ∈ U ) • X ≤ ˆ SD Y ⇐ U
9 First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: univariate case, Epistemic view amsmath amssymb X ≤ ˆ SD Y ⇐ ⇒ ∀ x ∈ x , y ∈ y : ∀ c ∈ R : |{ i : x i ≥ c }| ≤ |{ i : y i ≥ c }| c
10 b b b b b b b b b b b First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Epistemic View amsmath amssymb X ≤ ˆ SD Y ⇐ ⇒ ∀ X ∈ X , Y ∈ Y : ∀ U ⊆ R 2 upset : ˆ P ( X ∈ U ) ≤ ˆ P ( Y ∈ U )
11 First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Epistemic View
12 First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Ontic View amsmath amssymb x ⊑ y : ⇐ ⇒ ∀ x ∈ x , y ∈ y : x ≤ y ⇒ ∀ U uspet w.r.t. ⊑ : X ≤ ˆ SD Y ⇐ P ( X ∈ U ) ≤ ˆ ˆ P ( Y ∈ U ) c
13 First Order Stochastic Dominance for Interval Data: bivariate case, Ontic View amsmath amssymb x ⊑ y : ⇐ ⇒ ∀ x ∈ x , y ∈ y : x i ≤ y i ; i = 1 , 2 ∀ U upset w.r.t. ⊑ : ˆ P ( X ∈ U ) ≤ ˆ P ( Y ∈ U )
of stochatsic dominance. Epistemic and Ontic view lead to the same results w.r.t. the presence 14 Simple Fact
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.