Academic Integrity By Design November 15, 2017 Maggie Beers, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Academic Integrity By Design November 15, 2017 Maggie Beers, Executive Director of Academic Technology Kurt Daw, Professor of Theatre Arts Agenda Agenda 1 4 Who really cheats? Is there another Services way? F2F vs Online Universal
Academic Integrity By Design
November 15, 2017 Maggie Beers, Executive Director of Academic Technology Kurt Daw, Professor of Theatre Arts
Services
F2F vs Online
1 2 3 4 5 6
Who really cheats?
Physical & virtual proctoring
Who’s watching?
Campus resource dilemmas
What’s the cost?
Universal Design for Learning
Is there another way?
Academic Integrity Models
Design Showcase
What’s a campus to do?
Discussion
Agenda Agenda
Who really cheats & why?
What the research says
noun 1.the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.
Merriam-Webster
to gain an advantage, especially in a game or examination.
Merriam-Webster
verb
Image Source: http://www.travelthruhistory.tv/quick-history-
"Princess Alice is watching you": Children's belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating
Do students cheat more online vs F2F?
Cheating is not solely the fault of our students or the declining ethical standards of the millennial generation, but a product of our testing-oriented and performance-
Who’s watching?
Physical & Virtual Proctoring
In-Class
In-person proctoring
During exams
Testing Center
Reservation & Fee required
Clickers
Register with
http://www.todayifoundout.com/ Virtual & High-Tech Approaches
What’s the cost?
Campus resource requirements
Virtual Proctoring Contenders
Usability & Functionality ProctorU Proctor.io Respondus
Schedule time/date for exam
Browser lockdown
X X
Video recording
Real-time “live” monitoring
X X
“Suspicious” behavior flagged
X X
Monitors student’s computer activity
X
Student authentication
LMS integration
Virtual Proctoring Costs
Virtual Proctoring Solution Annual Cost Pricing Parameters University Resources
Live proctoring (ProctorU) $650,000 1 exam (90 mins) per student None Smart Browser + Algorithm (Proctor.io) $32,500 1200 concurrent licenses 0.5 FTE staff Smart Browser (Respondus) $11,500 Annual fee + 1200 concurrent licenses 0.5 FTE staff
13,000=online students per semester 1,200=largest online course
Is there another way?
Instructional Design Strategies
Much of the research and advice on cheating... focuses on the learner, and on how we can better police or modify the learner.
[But] the amount of cheating that takes place in an educational situation may very well depend on the structure of the learning environment.
From Cheating Lessons, James M. Lang
skill in (something) by study, experience, or being taught.
Merriam-Webster
verb
Faculty showcase
Academic integrity strategies
Designs that promote academic integrity
Instructional design principles and strategies
Foster Intrinsic Motivation Focus on Learning over Performance Lower Assessment Stakes
Instill Self- Efficacy
Academic Integrity
(James M. Lange, 2013)
Focus on mastery over performance
Remove the competition from grades
Lower assessment stakes
My course has more to offer than just the extrinsic reward of a grade. Foster intrinsic motivation
I have something wonderful to teach you. I am going to challenge you. You are capable of meeting that challenge.
Instill self-efficacy
Metacognitive Surveys
Knowing what you know
The environments which reduce the incentive and opportunity to cheat... will lead to greater and deeper learning by your students. From Cheating Lessons
What’s a campus to do?
A special thank you to Monica Muñoz for her support in researching this presentation and supporting our Academic Integrity efforts at SF State.
Contact Us
Academic Technology
Academic Technology
San Francisco State University 1600 Holloway Avenue San Francisco, CA 94132
Phone
(415) 405-5555
Email/Website
iteach@sfsu.edu At.sfsu.edu