Amy L. Pastorak, M.Ed. Director of Special Education } Chambers Hill - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

amy l pastorak m ed director of special education
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Amy L. Pastorak, M.Ed. Director of Special Education } Chambers Hill - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Amy L. Pastorak, M.Ed. Director of Special Education } Chambers Hill Elementary School } 5 th Grade, SUP/FT Learning Support Program } February 12, 2018 Committee Meeting School Board presentation of draft plan } February 13, 2018


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Amy L. Pastorak, M.Ed. Director of Special Education

slide-2
SLIDE 2

} Chambers Hill Elementary School } 5th Grade, SUP/FT Learning Support Program

slide-3
SLIDE 3

} February 12, 2018

  • Committee Meeting
  • School Board presentation of draft plan

} February 13, 2018

  • Starts Public Review and Comment Period
  • Posted on Front Page of District Website, February 13- March 14

} March 26, 2018

  • School Board presentation/review of draft plan changes per

public review and comment period

} April 9, 2018

  • School Board vote on final Special Education Comprehensive Plan

} May 1, 2018

  • Plan submission to the Bureau of Special Education
slide-4
SLIDE 4

} Federal Law- Individuals with Disabilities

Education Act (IDEA)

} State Law-Pennsylvania Ch. 14 } Special Education Plan

  • 22 Pa Code § 14.104
  • Time table and format is established by the state
  • The special education plan is developed every three

years on the same cycle as the District Level Plan

  • Per school code, the Special Education Plan is

completed prior to the District Comp Plan

slide-5
SLIDE 5

} This District must affirm to the Bureau of

Special Education that:

  • Services and programs are designed to meet the

needs of students with disabilities

  • A full range of services and programs are available

to students with disabilities

  • Placement of students with disabilities in settings
  • ther than regular education settings may not be

based on lack of resources, facilities or staff

slide-6
SLIDE 6

} District Profile

  • Planning Committee

} Core Foundations

  • Data Review
  • District Process and Procedures

} Assurances

  • Facilities
  • Program Profile
  • Support and Contracted Services

} District Level Plan

  • Personnel Development
slide-7
SLIDE 7

} PDE only recommends one representative in

each category: Administrator, Parent, Regular Education Teacher, Special Education Teacher

} This mirrors the required attendees at an IEP

Meeting

} The District Special Education Parent Advisory

Council (SPAC) provided input to the draft in January

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

} Special Education Students

  • December 1, 2017 Child Count: 1756
  • CDHS Enrollment December 1, 2017: 1695

} The District has experienced steady growth in

  • ur special education population since 2011

} The growth primarily has been in the area of

students with significant disabilities such as:

  • Autism
  • Emotional Disturbance
  • Multi-Disabilities
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Two Identification Procedures for eligibility and need for specially designed instruction

  • 1. Discrepancy model, Multi-Disciplinary

Evaluation Process (MDE)

  • 2. RTII - Response to Intervention and Instruction

} Specific Learning Disability (SLD) in Reading only

  • PDE Approved Schools:

– South Side Elementary – EH Phillips Elementary – Rutherford Elementary – Lawnton Elementary – Tri-Community Elementary

slide-12
SLIDE 12

} The Special Education Comprehensive Plan must examine

three data categories per the Special Education Data Report, Data at a Glance

  • Disability Category
  • Educational Environment
  • Race/Ethnicity

} Data is complied from the district’s yearly Enrollment

(PIMS) and Child Count state submissions. Data for the state is managed by Penn State Harrisburg with oversight by the Bureau of Special Education

slide-13
SLIDE 13

https://penndata.hbg.psu.edu/PublicReporting/ DataataGlance/tabid/2523/Default.aspx

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

} PDE sets a state range of 10% above or below the

state average for disability analysis purposes

} The District falls above the state range by:

  • Autism -1.93%
  • Intellectual Disability - 0.35%
  • Multi-Disability - 0.09%

AUTISM AUTISM Sta tate te LEA EA (CD) D) 10.7 % 10.7 % 13.7 % 13.7 % Sta tate te Range (9.63 % to to11.77 %) 13.7 % - 13.7 % - 11.77 % = 1.93 % 11.77 % = 1.93 % CD D is 1.93 % above th the sta tate te range for Auti tism

slide-16
SLIDE 16

} The District falls below the state range by:

  • Other Health Impairment (OHI)- 1.31%

} The District falls within the state range for all other

disability categories

} Overall, the District is below the state percent for

total special education students

} CD- 14.7% } State- 16.5%

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

} Educational Environment is the calculation of a

student with an IEP’s time during the school day they are with regular education students

} The District is 11.4% below the state average in

the area “Inside th the Regular Class by 80% or mo more” or 5.26% below the state range

} Targeted areas of improvement have already

been identified to increase the percent of students with disabilities in the regular education classroom

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

} PDE requires us to review the data and ensure

referral procedures and cultural awareness/ responsiveness strategies are in place

} Race/Ethnicity is not a single determining factor

for eligibility of special education services

} The District adheres to clearly defined referral

and child find procedures

} The District provides cultural responsiveness

training to staff

slide-21
SLIDE 21

} Section 1306 of the Public School Code

requires the District to have Non-Resident Student Oversight and Incarcerated Student Oversight.

} The plan outlines delivery of special and

regular education services to students in Dauphin County Prison and Schaffner Youth Center.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

} Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) } The District must ensure comprehensive

practices are in place to ensure students with disabilities are educated with their non-disabled peers to the maximum extent possible District Practices:

  • RtII
  • PBIS
  • Assistive Technology practices
  • Community Based Instruction
  • Work Experience Programs
slide-23
SLIDE 23

} PBIS – Positive Behavior Interventions and

Supports in 17/19 schools

} Partnership with True North Wellness for

school based outpatient counseling

} 4 Behavioral Specialists support 19 schools } Masters level Therapist assigned to every

full-time Emotional support program

} Safe Crisis Management annual trainings

slide-24
SLIDE 24

} The district offers a full continuum of services by

supporting all disability categories in our 19 schools

} Strong partnership with PaTTAN’s Autism Initiative } Andrew’s Gift Grant

  • Technology and Literacy grant program at Mt. View

Elementary School

} SPAC- Special Education Parent Advisory Council

  • Parent Trainings offered 3xs per year

} Work Experience Program- CDEHS & CDHS

  • Over 100 secondary students with special needs working in
  • ur community
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

} Provides a snapshot of professional staff who

carry caseloads

} The BSE approves additions and deletions to

this section of the plan

} The district has 125 program positions } Program positions only account for staff/

programs who carry caseloads

  • District Special Education Teachers
  • District Speech, DHH, BVI staff
  • IU Classrooms operated within the District
slide-27
SLIDE 27

} Ch. 14 dictates caseload requirements

slide-28
SLIDE 28

} Accounts for district staff that do not carry

caseloads per Ch. 14 requirements

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

} The plan outlines training in the following

required areas during the life of the plan:

  • Autism
  • Behavior
  • Transition
  • Reading
  • Paraprofessionals

} The District exceeds the expectations for

training beyond these four categories due to Summer Academy and other in-service requirements

slide-31
SLIDE 31

} Senior, Central Dauphin High School } Project Search; CAIU Program

slide-32
SLIDE 32