Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

analysis of a rate independent model for adhesive contact
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects Riccarda Rossi (Universit` a di Brescia) joint work


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

Riccarda Rossi (Universit` a di Brescia) joint work with Tom´ aˇ s Roub´ ıˇ cek (Univerzita Karlova v Praze & CAS) Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 22.03.2010

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Geometrical setting

  • Ω1, Ω2: viscoelastic bulk domains,

Ω . = Ω1 ∪ Ω2

  • on ΓC, Ω1 and Ω2 are in adhesive contact. Denote by ν unit normal on ΓC,
  • riented from Ω2 to Ω1
  • ∂Ω .

= ΓD ∪ ΓN:

◮ ΓD with Dirichlet boundary conditions ◮ ΓN with Neumann boundary conditions

  • evolution problem in [0, T]

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Adhesive contact versus brittle delamination

Two different models

◮ delamination as an inelastic process ⇒ brittle delamination models ◮ elastic response of the adhesive ⇒ adhesive contact models

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Outline

◮ Modeling adhesive contact ◮ PDE system ◮ Weak formulation ◮ Existence results ◮ Sketch of the proof ◮ Outlook to delamination

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling approaches: fracture mechanics versus damage mechanics

Fracture mechanics approach:

◮ brittle delamination ∼ evolution during [0, T] of a single crack along

prescribed path = ΓC ∀t ∈ [0, T] ΓC = ΓA(t) | {z }

perfect adhesion

∪ ΓC\ΓA(t) | {z }

complete delamination

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling approaches: fracture mechanics versus damage mechanics

Fracture mechanics approach:

◮ brittle delamination ∼ evolution during [0, T] of a single crack along

prescribed path = ΓC ∀t ∈ [0, T] ΓC = ΓA(t) | {z }

perfect adhesion

∪ ΓC\ΓA(t) | {z }

complete delamination

◮ irreversibility enforced by dissipation distance

D(ΓA,1, ΓA,2) = ( R

ΓA,1\ΓA,2 a(x)dS

if ΓA,1 ⊃ ΓA,2, +∞

  • therwise,

a = a(x) ≥ 0 activation energy for delamination: t → ΓA(t) “decreasing”

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling approaches: fracture mechanics versus damage mechanics

Fracture mechanics approach:

◮ brittle delamination ∼ evolution during [0, T] of a single crack along

prescribed path = ΓC ∀t ∈ [0, T] ΓC = ΓA(t) | {z }

perfect adhesion

∪ ΓC\ΓA(t) | {z }

complete delamination

◮ irreversibility enforced by dissipation distance

D(ΓA,1, ΓA,2) = ( R

ΓA,1\ΓA,2 a(x)dS

if ΓA,1 ⊃ ΓA,2, +∞

  • therwise,

a = a(x) ≥ 0 activation energy for delamination: t → ΓA(t) “decreasing”

◮ activated, rate-independent phenomenon

See [Dal Maso–Zanini’07, Thomas–S¨ andig’06, Toader–Zanini’09, Negri–Ortner’08, Cagnetti’09, Knees–Mielke–Zanini’08,’09..]

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling approaches: fracture mechanics versus damage mechanics

Damage mechanics approach

Proposed by [M. Fr´ emond’82,’87]

◮ delamination/adhesive contact described by a damage variable z ◮ z ∼ volume fraction of debonded molecular links ◮ evolution of z:

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling approaches: fracture mechanics versus damage mechanics

Damage mechanics approach

Proposed by [M. Fr´ emond’82,’87]

◮ delamination/adhesive contact described by a damage variable z ◮ z ∼ volume fraction of debonded molecular links ◮ evolution of z:

◮ either driven by viscous dissipation, isothermal & anisothermal cases:

[Andrews–Shillor-Wright-Klarbring, Bonetti-Bonfanti-R., Chau-Fern´ andez-Shillor-Sofonea, Figuereido-Trabucho, Point, Raous-Cang´ emi-Cocou, ....] & monograph on contact with adhesion [Sofonea-Han-Shillor]

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling approaches: fracture mechanics versus damage mechanics

Damage mechanics approach

Proposed by [M. Fr´ emond’82,’87]

◮ delamination/adhesive contact described by a damage variable z ◮ z ∼ volume fraction of debonded molecular links ◮ evolution of z:

◮ either driven by viscous dissipation, isothermal & anisothermal cases:

[Andrews–Shillor-Wright-Klarbring, Bonetti-Bonfanti-R., Chau-Fern´ andez-Shillor-Sofonea, Figuereido-Trabucho, Point, Raous-Cang´ emi-Cocou, ....] & monograph on contact with adhesion [Sofonea-Han-Shillor]

◮ or rate-independent. Results in the isothermal case: ◮ adhesive contact problem [Koˇ

cvara–Mielke–Roub´ ıˇ cek’06]

◮ delamination problem [Roub´

ıˇ cek–Scardia–Zanini’09]

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling approaches: fracture mechanics versus damage mechanics

Damage mechanics approach

Proposed by [M. Fr´ emond’82,’87]

◮ delamination/adhesive contact described by a damage variable z ◮ z ∼ volume fraction of debonded molecular links ◮ evolution of z:

◮ either driven by viscous dissipation, isothermal & anisothermal cases:

[Andrews–Shillor-Wright-Klarbring, Bonetti-Bonfanti-R., Chau-Fern´ andez-Shillor-Sofonea, Figuereido-Trabucho, Point, Raous-Cang´ emi-Cocou, ....] & monograph on contact with adhesion [Sofonea-Han-Shillor]

◮ or rate-independent. Results in the isothermal case: ◮ adhesive contact problem [Koˇ

cvara–Mielke–Roub´ ıˇ cek’06]

◮ delamination problem [Roub´

ıˇ cek–Scardia–Zanini’09]

♦ Approach based on hemivariational inequalities [Panagiotopoulos..]

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

State variables

◮ in the volume domain Ω:

◮ displacement u e(u) symm. linear. strain tensor (small strains) ◮ thermal effects θ absolute temperature Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

State variables

◮ in the volume domain Ω:

◮ displacement u e(u) symm. linear. strain tensor (small strains) ◮ thermal effects θ absolute temperature

◮ on the contact surface ΓC:

◮ adhesion variable z “damage parameter”

On ΓC we also consider ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = u+|ΓC | {z }

trace on ΓC

  • f u|Ω1

− u−|ΓC | {z }

trace on ΓC

  • f u|Ω2

= the jump of u across ΓC.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Constraints: irreversibility, unilateral contact..

◮ Admissible values for z: z ∈ [0, 1]

◮ z(x) = 1: at x ∈ ΓC adhesive completely sound & fully effective ◮ 0 < z(x) < 1: at x ∈ ΓC a fraction of the molecular links is broken ◮ z(x) = 0: at x ∈ ΓC surface is completely debonded Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Constraints: irreversibility, unilateral contact..

◮ Admissible values for z: z ∈ [0, 1]

◮ z(x) = 1: at x ∈ ΓC adhesive completely sound & fully effective ◮ 0 < z(x) < 1: at x ∈ ΓC a fraction of the molecular links is broken ◮ z(x) = 0: at x ∈ ΓC surface is completely debonded

◮ θ is the absolute temperature: θ > 0

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Constraints: irreversibility, unilateral contact..

◮ Admissible values for z: z ∈ [0, 1]

◮ z(x) = 1: at x ∈ ΓC adhesive completely sound & fully effective ◮ 0 < z(x) < 1: at x ∈ ΓC a fraction of the molecular links is broken ◮ z(x) = 0: at x ∈ ΓC surface is completely debonded

◮ θ is the absolute temperature: θ > 0 ◮ Damaging of the glue is a unidirectional process:

.

z ≤ 0 (irreversibility)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Constraints: irreversibility, unilateral contact..

◮ Admissible values for z: z ∈ [0, 1]

◮ z(x) = 1: at x ∈ ΓC adhesive completely sound & fully effective ◮ 0 < z(x) < 1: at x ∈ ΓC a fraction of the molecular links is broken ◮ z(x) = 0: at x ∈ ΓC surface is completely debonded

◮ θ is the absolute temperature: θ > 0 ◮ Damaging of the glue is a unidirectional process:

.

z ≤ 0 (irreversibility)

◮ No interpenetration between Ω1 and Ω2: unilateral contact conditions

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Unilateral (frictionless) Signorini contact

  • Signorini conditions in complementarity form:

ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ · ν ≥ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(no interpenetration) (Sign1) σ|ΓC |{z}

traction stress on ΓC

ν · ν ≥ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Sign2) σ|ΓCν · ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Sign3) σ|ΓCν · t = 0 on ΓC × (0, T) ∀ t s.t. ν · t = 0 (Sign4) (Sign2) & (Sign3) & (Sign4) yield

◮ [

[u] ] · ν > 0 ⇒ σ|ΓCν = 0 (no reaction)

◮ [

[u] ] · ν = 0 ⇒ σ|ΓCν = λν, λ ≥ 0 (reaction is triggered)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for u

Momentum equilibrium equation ̺.. u − div(σ) = F in Ω × (0, T).

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for u

Momentum equilibrium equation ̺.. u − div(σ) = F in Ω × (0, T). Ansatz of generalized standard solids:

◮ inertial effects

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for u

Momentum equilibrium equation ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T). (equ) Ansatz of generalized standard solids:

◮ inertial effects ◮ stress σ features viscous response of material (Kelvin-Voigt rheology)

σ = De(. u) | {z }

viscosity

+ C ` e(u)−Eθ ´  C, D 4th-order positive definite and symmetric tensors E matrix of thermal expansion coefficients

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for u

Momentum equilibrium equation ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T). (equ) Ansatz of generalized standard solids:

◮ inertial effects ◮ stress σ features viscous response of material (Kelvin-Voigt rheology)

σ = De(. u) | {z }

viscosity

+ C ` e(u)−Eθ ´  C, D 4th-order positive definite and symmetric tensors E matrix of thermal expansion coefficients

◮ F applied bulk force

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for u

Momentum equilibrium equation ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T). (equ) Ansatz of generalized standard solids:

◮ inertial effects ◮ stress σ features viscous response of material (Kelvin-Voigt rheology)

σ = De(. u) | {z }

viscosity

+ C ` e(u)−Eθ ´  C, D 4th-order positive definite and symmetric tensors E matrix of thermal expansion coefficients

◮ F applied bulk force

+ boundary conditions on ∂Ω = ΓD ∪ ΓN:  u = 0

  • n ΓD × (0, T)

σn = f

  • n ΓN × (0, T)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for u

Momentum equilibrium equation ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T). (equ) Ansatz of generalized standard solids:

◮ inertial effects ◮ stress σ features viscous response of material (Kelvin-Voigt rheology)

σ = De(. u) | {z }

viscosity

+ C ` e(u)−Eθ ´  C, D 4th-order positive definite and symmetric tensors E matrix of thermal expansion coefficients

◮ F applied bulk force

+ boundary conditions on ∂Ω = ΓD ∪ ΓN:  u = 0

  • n ΓD × (0, T)

σn = f

  • n ΓN × (0, T)

+ complementarity problem on ΓC encompassing adhesion variable z in Signorini contact

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ + div(j) = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) It balances heat flux & rate of heat production due to dissipation:

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ + div(j) = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) It balances heat flux & rate of heat production due to dissipation:

◮ cv(θ) heat capacity

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ +div ` −K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u)+θCE: e(. u)+G in Ω×(0, T) (eqθ) It balances heat flux & rate of heat production due to dissipation:

◮ cv(θ) heat capacity ◮ j heat flux, given by Fourier’s law in an anisotropic medium

j = −K(e(u), θ)∇θ, K(e(u), θ) pos. def. matrix heat conduction coefficients

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) (eqθ) It balances heat flux & rate of heat production due to dissipation:

◮ cv(θ) heat capacity ◮ j heat flux, given by Fourier’s law in an anisotropic medium

j = −K(e(u), θ)∇θ, K(e(u), θ) pos. def. matrix heat conduction coefficients

◮ De(.

u): e(. u) viscous dissipation potential in the bulk

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) (eqθ) It balances heat flux & rate of heat production due to dissipation:

◮ cv(θ) heat capacity ◮ j heat flux, given by Fourier’s law in an anisotropic medium

j = −K(e(u), θ)∇θ, K(e(u), θ) pos. def. matrix heat conduction coefficients

◮ De(.

u): e(. u) viscous dissipation potential in the bulk

◮ G external heat source

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T). (eqθ) + Neumann boundary conditions on ∂Ω: K(e(u), θ)∇θ · n = g on ∂Ω × (0, T), g external heat source

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T). (eqθ) + Neumann boundary conditions on ∂Ω: K(e(u), θ)∇θ · n = g on ∂Ω × (0, T), g external heat source + conditions ΓC featuring dissipation rate on ΓC 1 2 ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ|+

ΓC+K(e(u), θ)∇θ|− ΓC

´ ·ν+η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ θ ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC×(0, T), (T1)

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), θ)∇θ ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(T2)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for θ

Heat equation cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T). (eqθ) + Neumann boundary conditions on ∂Ω: K(e(u), θ)∇θ · n = g on ∂Ω × (0, T), g external heat source + conditions ΓC featuring dissipation rate on ΓC 1 2 ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ|+

ΓC+K(e(u), θ)∇θ|− ΓC

´ ·ν+η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ θ ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC×(0, T), (T1)

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), θ)∇θ ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(T2)

◮ (T1): transient condition on ΓC with

 η([ [u] ], z) heat transfer coefficient heat convection [ [θ] ] jump of temperature across ΓC

◮ (T2) balances normal jump of heat flux j = −K∇θ with dissipation rate

ζ(. z) on ΓC

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

(Frictionless) unilateral contact in the adhesive case

  • Complementarity problem with σ = De(.

u) + C(e(u)−Eθ) and z

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

(Frictionless) unilateral contact in the adhesive case

  • Complementarity problem with σ = De(.

u) + C(e(u)−Eθ) and z ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ · ν ≥ 0 on ΓC × (0, T) (no interpenetration) (Sign1) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ν ≥ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

2

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

3

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · t = 0 on ΓC × (0, T) ∀ t s.t. ν · t = 0 (Signnew

4

)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

(Frictionless) unilateral contact in the adhesive case

  • Complementarity problem with σ = De(.

u) + C(e(u)−Eθ) and z ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ · ν ≥ 0 on ΓC × (0, T) (no interpenetration) (Sign1) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ν ≥ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

2

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

3

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · t = 0 on ΓC × (0, T) ∀ t s.t. ν · t = 0 (Signnew

4

) When z = 0 (Signnew

2

) & (Signnew

3

) & (Signnew

4

) reduce to Signorini conditions

◮ [

[u] ] · ν > 0 ⇒ σ|ΓCν = 0 (no reaction)

◮ [

[u] ] · ν = 0 ⇒ σ|ΓCν = λν, λ ≥ 0 (reaction is triggered)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

(Frictionless) unilateral contact in the adhesive case

  • Complementarity problem with σ = De(.

u) + C(e(u)−Eθ) and z ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ · ν ≥ 0 on ΓC × (0, T) (no interpenetration) (Sign1) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ν ≥ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

2

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

3

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · t = 0 on ΓC × (0, T) ∀ t s.t. ν · t = 0 (Signnew

4

) When z > 0 (adhesion active) (Signnew

2

) & (Signnew

3

) & (Signnew

4

) yield σ|ΓCν = λν − κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ ν, λ ≥ 0 even for λ = 0 there’s a reaction ∼ κz[ [u] ] counteracting separation this is the elastic response of the adhesive

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

(Frictionless) unilateral contact in the adhesive case

  • Complementarity problem with σ = De(.

u) + C(e(u)−Eθ) and z ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ · ν ≥ 0 on ΓC × (0, T) (no interpenetration) (Sign1) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ν ≥ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

2

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(Signnew

3

) ` σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ · t = 0 on ΓC × (0, T) ∀ t s.t. ν · t = 0 (Signnew

4

) Equivalently formulated as differential inclusion σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

with C = C(x) = {v ∈ Rd : v · ν(x) ≥ 0} for a.a. x ∈ ΓC and ∂IC convex analysis subdifferential of the indicator function IC.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

General contact conditions on ΓC

Signorini contact can be replaced by σ|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

with C = C(x) closed cone for a.a. x ∈ ΓC .

Examples

◮ (Signorini) unilateral contact, no interpenetration

C = C(x) = {v ∈ Rd; v · ν(x) ≥ 0} for a.a. x ∈ ΓC

◮ tangential slip along ΓC

C = C(x) = {v ∈ Rd; v · ν(x) = 0} for a.a. x ∈ ΓC

◮ very simplified model: C = C(x) linear subspace of Rd

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for z

Flow rule for z ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz) It’s a balance law between dissipation and stored energy

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Equation for z

Flow rule for z ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz) It’s a balance law between dissipation and stored energy

◮ ζ(.

z) dissipation potential on ΓC, enforces irreversibility

◮ I[0,1](z) constraint z ∈ [0, 1] ◮ 1 2κ

˛ ˛[ [u] ] ˛ ˛2 ∼ elastic response of the adhesive

◮ a0 (phenomenological specific) stored energy by disintegrating the

adhesive.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-dependent vs. rate-independent evolution for z

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-dependent vs. rate-independent evolution for z

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Viscous models

ζ = ζ(. z) has superlinear growth at infinity. In particular, ζ(. z) = 1 2|. z|2 + I(−∞,0](. z) (gradient flow case)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-dependent vs. rate-independent evolution for z

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Viscous models

ζ = ζ(. z) has superlinear growth at infinity. In particular, ζ(. z) = 1 2|. z|2 + I(−∞,0](. z) (gradient flow case)

Rate-independent models, our choice

ζ = ζ(. z) has linear growth at infinity: 1-positively homogeneous ζ(λv) = λζ(v) ∀ λ ≥ 0 In particular, ζ(. z) = a1|. z| + I(−∞,0](. z) with a1 (phenomenological specific) dissipated energy by disintegrating the adhesive.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-dependent vs. rate-independent evolution for z

∂I(−∞,0](. z) − a1 + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Viscous models

ζ = ζ(. z) has superlinear growth at infinity. In particular, ζ(. z) = 1 2|. z|2 + I(−∞,0](. z) (gradient flow case)

Rate-independent models, our choice

ζ = ζ(. z) has linear growth at infinity: 1-positively homogeneous ζ(λv) = λζ(v) ∀ λ ≥ 0 In particular, ζ(. z) = a1|. z| + I(−∞,0](. z) with a1 (phenomenological specific) dissipated energy by disintegrating the adhesive.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-independent evolutions

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-independent evolutions

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Features

◮ invariance under time-rescaling:

ζ is 1-homogeneous ⇒ ∂ζ is 0-homogeneous Hence z is solution of (eqz) if and only if z ◦ α is solution of (eqz) for every strictly increasing reparametrization α.

◮ Typical of activated systems: z responds to the activation energy in a

rate-independent way possibly with hysteresis effects

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-independent evolutions

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Mathematical difficulties

◮ ζ does NOT grow superlinearly at ∞ no “good” estimates for .

z standard regularity of t → z(t) is ONLY BV

◮ z may have jumps!!! weak formulations

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Rate-independent evolutions

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz)

Mathematical difficulties

◮ ζ does NOT grow superlinearly at ∞ no “good” estimates for .

z standard regularity of t → z(t) is ONLY BV

◮ z may have jumps!!! weak formulations

Theory of energetic solutions [Mielke et al.]

Weak, derivative-free formulations, based on

◮ energetic balance (energy identity) ◮ stability conditions ◮ enforcing irreversibility

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

The complete PDE system: viscous vs. rate-independent behaviour

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T),

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

The complete PDE system: viscous vs. rate-independent behaviour

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T),

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

The complete PDE system: viscous vs. rate-independent behaviour

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ))|ΓC | {z }

σ|ΓC

ν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

The complete PDE system: viscous vs. rate-independent behaviour

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ))|ΓC | {z }

σ|ΓC

ν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

The complete PDE system: viscous vs. rate-independent behaviour

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ))|ΓC | {z }

σ|ΓC

ν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

1 2 ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ|+

ΓC + K(e(u), θ)∇θ|− ΓC

´ · ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ θ ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), θ)∇θ ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

The complete PDE system: viscous vs. rate-independent behaviour

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ))|ΓC | {z }

σ|ΓC

ν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

1 2 ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ|+

ΓC + K(e(u), θ)∇θ|− ΓC

´ · ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ θ ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), θ)∇θ ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Not fully rate-independent model: viscosity-driven equations for u and ϑ coupled with rate-independent evolution for z.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

The complete PDE system: viscous vs. rate-independent behaviour

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ))|ΓC | {z }

σ|ΓC

ν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

1 2 ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ|+

ΓC + K(e(u), θ)∇θ|− ΓC

´ · ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ θ ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), θ)∇θ ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Not fully rate-independent model: viscosity-driven equations for u and ϑ coupled with rate-independent evolution for z. General theory for rate-independent evolutions coupled with viscous evolutions: [Roub´ ıˇ cek’09,’10]

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Mathematical difficulties (I)

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−Eθ ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−Eθ))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

1 2 ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ|+

ΓC + K(e(u), θ)∇θ|− ΓC

´ · ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ θ ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), θ)∇θ ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

♦ (quadratic) coupling terms between (equ) and (eqθ) only L1-estimates for r.h.s. of (eqθ)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Enthalpy reformulation

Only L1 estimates for the r.h.s. of cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) ⇒ Boccardo-Gallou¨ et techniques + suitable growth conditions on cv, e.g. c0(θ + 1)ω0 ≤ cv(θ) ≤ c1(θ + 1)ω1

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Enthalpy reformulation

Only L1 estimates for the r.h.s. of cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) ⇒ Boccardo-Gallou¨ et techniques + suitable growth conditions on cv, e.g. c0(θ + 1)ω0 ≤ cv(θ) ≤ c1(θ + 1)ω1 To combine this with time-discretization, enthalpy re-formulation  w = w(θ) = R ϑ

0 cv(r) dr,

θ = Θ(w)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Enthalpy reformulation

Only L1 estimates for the r.h.s. of cv(θ). θ − div ` K(e(u), θ)∇θ ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + θCE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) ⇒ Boccardo-Gallou¨ et techniques + suitable growth conditions on cv, e.g. c0(θ + 1)ω0 ≤ cv(θ) ≤ c1(θ + 1)ω1 To combine this with time-discretization, enthalpy re-formulation  w = w(θ) = R ϑ

0 cv(r) dr,

θ = Θ(w) hence

.

w−div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u)+Θ(w)CE: e(. u)+G in Ω×(0, T) (eqw) with C 1

θ(w 1/ω1 − 1) ≤ Θ(w) ≤ C 2 θ(w 1/ω0 − 1)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Mathematical difficulties (II)

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T),

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)) ˜ ˜ ν = 0 ΓC × (0, T), (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0 ΓC × (0, T), ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 ΓC × (0, T), 1 2 ` K(e(u), w)∇w|+

ΓC + K(e(u), w)∇w|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ Θ(w) ˜ ˜ = 0 ΓC × (0, T), ˆ ˆ K(e(u), w)∇w ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z) ΓC × (0, T)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Mathematical difficulties (II)

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T),

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G Ω × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)) ˜ ˜ ν = 0 ΓC × (0, T), (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0 ΓC × (0, T), ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 ΓC × (0, T), 1 2 ` K(e(u), w)∇w|+

ΓC + K(e(u), w)∇w|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ Θ(w) ˜ ˜ = 0 ΓC × (0, T), ˆ ˆ K(e(u), w)∇w ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z) ΓC × (0, T) ♦ coupling terms between (equ), (eqw) and (eqz) involve traces of u and w

  • n ΓC need of sufficient regularity of u and w to control u|ΓC and w|ΓC

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Mathematical difficulties (III)

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T),

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)) ˜ ˜ ν = 0 ΓC × (0, T), (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0 ΓC × (0, T), ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 ΓC × (0, T), 1 2 ` K(e(u), w)∇w|+

ΓC + K(e(u), w)∇w|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ Θ(w) ˜ ˜ = 0 ΓC × (0, T), ˆ ˆ K(e(u), w)∇w ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z) ΓC × (0, T) ♦ rate-independent evolution for z lack of regularity of t → z(t), z may have jumps, . z need not be well-defined!

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for z (I)

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 Weak, derivative-free formulation semi-stability condition: ∀˜ z ∈ L∞(ΓC) : Φ ` u(t), z(t) ´ ≤ Φ ` u(t), ˜ z ´ +R ` ˜ z −z(t) ´ for a.a. t ∈ (0, T) (S) with

◮ dissipation potential

R ` ˜ z−z) := Z

ΓC

ζ(˜ z−z) dS = 8 < : Z

ΓC

a1|˜ z−z| dS if ˜ z ≤ z a.e. in ΓC, +∞

  • therwise.

◮ stored energy functional

Φ(u, z) := Z

1 2Ce(u): e(u) dx+IC( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ )+ Z

ΓC

“κ 2 z ˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 + I[0,1](z) − a0z ” dS

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for z (I)

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 Weak, derivative-free formulation semi-stability condition: ∀˜ z ∈ L∞(ΓC) : Φ ` u(t), z(t) ´ ≤ Φ ` u(t), ˜ z ´ +R ` ˜ z −z(t) ´ for a.a. t ∈ (0, T) (S) with

◮ dissipation potential

R ` ˜ z−z) := Z

ΓC

ζ(˜ z−z) dS = 8 < : Z

ΓC

a1|˜ z−z| dS if ˜ z ≤ z a.e. in ΓC, +∞

  • therwise.

◮ stored energy functional

Φ(u, z) := Z

1 2Ce(u): e(u) dx+IC( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ )+ Z

ΓC

“κ 2 z ˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 + I[0,1](z) − a0z ” dS Remark: (S) only a semi-stability condition (u(t) is fixed)! This reflects the fact that PDE system NOT FULLY RATE-INDEPENDENT, u has viscosity-driven evolution!

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for z (II)

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 | {z }

= ∂zΦ(u, z)

∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

(eqz) implies ∀˜ z ∈ L∞(ΓC) : Φ ` u(t), z(t) ´ ≤ Φ ` u(t), ˜ z ´ +R ` ˜ z −z(t) ´ for a.a. t ∈ (0, T) (S)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for z (II)

Proof:

  • use that ∂ζ(.

z) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) (1-homogeneity of ζ)

  • fix ˜

z ∈ L∞(ΓC) and test − “ ∂I[0,1](z(t)) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u(t) ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ” | {z }

= −∂zΦ(u(t), z(t))

∈ ∂ζ(. z(t)) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) by ˜ z − z(t)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for z (II)

Proof:

  • use that ∂ζ(.

z) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) (1-homogeneity of ζ)

  • fix ˜

z ∈ L∞(ΓC) and test − “ ∂I[0,1](z(t)) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u(t) ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ” | {z }

= −∂zΦ(u(t), z(t))

∈ ∂ζ(. z(t)) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) by ˜ z − z(t)

  • Hence

Z

ΓC

ζ(˜ z−z(t)) | {z }

= R ` ˜ z−z(t))

− Z

ΓC

ζ(0) | {z }

= 0

≥ −∂zΦ(u, z(t)), ˜ z − z(t)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for z (II)

Proof:

  • use that ∂ζ(.

z) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) (1-homogeneity of ζ)

  • fix ˜

z ∈ L∞(ΓC) and test − “ ∂I[0,1](z(t)) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u(t) ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ” | {z }

= −∂zΦ(u(t), z(t))

∈ ∂ζ(. z(t)) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) by ˜ z − z(t)

  • Hence

Z

ΓC

ζ(˜ z−z(t)) | {z }

= R ` ˜ z−z(t))

− Z

ΓC

ζ(0) | {z }

= 0

≥ −∂zΦ(u, z(t)), ˜ z − z(t)

Φ(u,·) convex

≥ Φ(u(t), z(t)) − Φ(u(t), ˜ z)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for z (II)

Proof:

  • use that ∂ζ(.

z) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) (1-homogeneity of ζ)

  • fix ˜

z ∈ L∞(ΓC) and test − “ ∂I[0,1](z(t)) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u(t) ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ” | {z }

= −∂zΦ(u(t), z(t))

∈ ∂ζ(. z(t)) ⊂ ∂ζ(0) by ˜ z − z(t)

  • Hence

Z

ΓC

ζ(˜ z−z(t)) | {z }

= R ` ˜ z−z(t))

− Z

ΓC

ζ(0) | {z }

= 0

≥ −∂zΦ(u, z(t)), ˜ z − z(t)

Φ(u,·) convex

≥ Φ(u(t), z(t)) − Φ(u(t), ˜ z) Remark: if t → z(t) absolutely continuous (no jumps): semi-stability condition (S) (+ energy identity) ⇒ (eqz)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for u

From 8 > > < > > : ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), [ [De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w))] ]ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz[ [u] ] + ∂IC ` [ [u] ] ´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for u

From 8 > > < > > : ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), [ [De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w))] ]ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz[ [u] ] + ∂IC ` [ [u] ] ´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

to 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : [ [u] ] ∈ C on ΓC × (0, T),

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the equation for u

From 8 > > < > > : ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T), [ [De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w))] ]ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz[ [u] ] + ∂IC ` [ [u] ] ´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

to 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : [ [u] ] ∈ C on ΓC × (0, T), ̺ Z

.

u(T) · ` v(T)−. u(T) ´ dx + Z T Z

` De(. u) + C ` e(u) − EΘ(w) ´ : e(v − u) dxdt − Z T Z

̺. u · `. v−. u ´ dxdt + Z T Z

ΓC

κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ · ˆ ˆ v−u ˜ ˜ dSdt ≥ ̺ Z

.

u0 · ` v(0)−u(0) ´ dx + Z T Z

F · (v−u) dxdt + Z T Z

ΓN

f · (v−u) dSdt for all test func. v s.t. v = 0 on ΓD × (0, T) and [ [v] ] ∈ C on ΓC × (0, T)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the enthalpy equation

From 8 > > < > > :

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)B: e(. u) + G Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T)

1 2

` K(e(u), w)∇w|+

ΓC + K(e(u), w)∇w|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η([ [u] ], z)[ [Θ(w)] ] = 0 ΓC × (0, T), [ [K(e(u), w)∇w] ] · ν = ζ(. z) ΓC × (0, T)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the enthalpy equation

From 8 > > < > > :

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)B: e(. u) + G Ω × (0, T), + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T)

1 2

` K(e(u), w)∇w|+

ΓC + K(e(u), w)∇w|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η([ [u] ], z)[ [Θ(w)] ] = 0 ΓC × (0, T), [ [K(e(u), w)∇w] ] · ν = ζ(. z) ΓC × (0, T) to 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : Z

w(T)v(T) dx + Z T Z

K(e(u), w)∇w · ∇v − w . v dxdt + Z T Z

ΓC

η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ Θ(w) ˜ ˜ˆ ˆ v ˜ ˜ dSdt = Z T Z

` De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)C: Ee(. u) ´ v dxdt − Z T Z

ΓC

v|+

ΓC+v|− ΓC

2 hz(dSdt) + Z T Z

Gv dxdt + Z T Z

∂Ω

gv dSdt + Z

w0v(0) dx for all test functions v, with hz measure induced by dissipation ζ

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the adhesive contact PDE system

Find a triple (u, z, w) with u ∈ W 1,2(0, T; W 1,2

ΓD (Ω; Rd)) ∩ W 1,∞(0, T; L2(Ω; Rd)),

z ∈ L∞(ΓC × (0, T)) ∩ BV([0, T]; L1(ΓC)), w ∈ Lr(0, T; W 1,r(Ω\ΓC)) ∩ L∞(0, T; L1(Ω)) ∩ BV([0, T]; W 1,r′(Ω\ΓC)∗) ∀ 1 ≤ r < d+2

d+1,

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the adhesive contact PDE system

Find a triple (u, z, w) with u ∈ W 1,2(0, T; W 1,2

ΓD (Ω; Rd)) ∩ W 1,∞(0, T; L2(Ω; Rd)),

z ∈ L∞(ΓC × (0, T)) ∩ BV([0, T]; L1(ΓC)), w ∈ Lr(0, T; W 1,r(Ω\ΓC)) ∩ L∞(0, T; L1(Ω)) ∩ BV([0, T]; W 1,r′(Ω\ΓC)∗) ∀ 1 ≤ r < d+2

d+1, fulfilling ◮ semi-stability ◮ weak formulation of the momentum equation ◮ weak formulation of the enthalpy equation

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Weak formulation of the adhesive contact PDE system

Find a triple (u, z, w) with u ∈ W 1,2(0, T; W 1,2

ΓD (Ω; Rd)) ∩ W 1,∞(0, T; L2(Ω; Rd)),

z ∈ L∞(ΓC × (0, T)) ∩ BV([0, T]; L1(ΓC)), w ∈ Lr(0, T; W 1,r(Ω\ΓC)) ∩ L∞(0, T; L1(Ω)) ∩ BV([0, T]; W 1,r′(Ω\ΓC)∗) ∀ 1 ≤ r < d+2

d+1, fulfilling ◮ semi-stability ◮ weak formulation of the momentum equation ◮ weak formulation of the enthalpy equation ◮ total energy inequality

1 2 Z

̺ |. u(T)|2 dx + Φ ` u(T), z(T) ´ + Z

w(T) dx ≤1 2 Z

̺ |. u(0)|2 dx + Φ ` u(0), z(0) ´ + Z

w(0) dx + Z T Z

F·. u dxdt + Z T Z

ΓN

f ·. u dSdt + Z T Z

G dxdt + Z T Z

∂Ω

g dSdt

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (I)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (I)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0) if ̺ = 0 and C = C(x) general closed cone in Rd

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (I)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0) if ̺ = 0 and C = C(x) general closed cone in Rd then the Cauchy problem for the weak formulation

◮ semi-stability ◮ weak formulation of the momentum equation ◮ weak formulation of the enthalpy equation ◮ total energy inequality

Φ ` u(T), z(T) ´ + Z

w(T) dx ≤Φ ` u(0), z(0) ´ + Z

w(0) dx + Z T Z

F·. u dxdt + Z T Z

ΓN

f ·. u dSdt + Z T Z

G dxdt + Z T Z

∂Ω

g dSdt

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (I)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0) if ̺ = 0 and C = C(x) general closed cone in Rd then the Cauchy problem for the weak formulation has a solution (u, w, z).

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (II)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (II)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0) if ̺ > 0 and C = C(x) linear subspace in Rd

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (II)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0) if ̺ > 0 and C = C(x) linear subspace in Rd then the Cauchy problem for the weak formulation

◮ semi-stability ◮ weak formulation of the momentum equation ◮ weak formulation of the enthalpy equation ◮ total energy inequality

1 2 Z

̺ |. u(T)|2 dx + Φ ` u(T), z(T) ´ + Z

w(T) dx ≤1 2 Z

̺ |. u(0)|2 dx + Φ ` u(0), z(0) ´ + Z

w(0) dx + Z T Z

F·. u dxdt + Z T Z

ΓN

f ·. u dSdt + Z T Z

G dxdt + Z T Z

∂Ω

g dSdt

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Existence theorem (II)

Under conditions on the data cv, K, η + conditions on the initial data (u0, . u0, z0, w0) if ̺ > 0 and C = C(x) linear subspace in Rd then the Cauchy problem for the weak formulation has a solution (u, w, z).

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Outline of the proof (I)

♦ Approximation via ε-Yosida regularization of the constraint [ [u] ] ∈ C on ΓC , i.e. (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0 on ΓC × (0, T) replaced by (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + (∂IC)ε `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0 on ΓC × (0, T).

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Outline of the proof (I)

♦ Approximation via ε-Yosida regularization of the constraint [ [u] ] ∈ C on ΓC , i.e. (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0 on ΓC × (0, T) replaced by (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + (∂IC)ε `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0 on ΓC × (0, T).

Penalization

In the case of (frictionless) Signorini contact C = C(x) = {v ∈ Rd; v · ν(x) ≥ 0} for a.a. x ∈ ΓC then (∂IC)ε([ [u] ]) = − 1

ε([

[u] ] · ν)−ν , hence approximation reduces to penalization (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ −1 ε ( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ · ν)−ν ∋ 0 on ΓC × (0, T)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Outline of the proof (II)

♦ Approximation of the ε-Yosida regularized problem via semi-implicit time discretization: τ > 0 time-step partition {t0 = 0 < t1 < . . . < tk < . . . < tKτ = T} Time-discrete problem: find {(uk

ετ, w k ετ, zk ετ)}Kτ k=1 fulfilling

̺D2 t uk ετ − div “ De ` Dt uk ετ ´ + C ` e(uk ετ )−EΘ(wk ετ ) ´ + τ ˛ ˛e(uk ετ ) ˛ ˛γ−2e(uk ετ ) ” = Fk τ in Ω, + Dir. b.c. on ΓD + Neu. b.c. on ΓN Dt wk ετ − div ` K(wk ετ , e(uk ετ ))∇wk ετ ´ 1 2 ` 2−√τ ´ De ` Dt uk ετ ´ : e ` Dt uk ετ ´ + Θ(wk ετ )E : Ce ` Dt uk ετ ´ + Gk τ in Ω, + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω, ∂ζ(Dt zk ετ ) + ∂I[0,1](zk ετ ) + κ 2 ˛ ˛ˆ ˆ uk ετ ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 + ταzk ετ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC ,

ˆ ˆ De(Dt uk ετ ) + C(e(uk ετ )−Θ(wk ετ )E) + τ ˛ ˛e(uk ετ ) ˛ ˛γ−2e(uk ετ ) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC ,

κzk ετ ˆ ˆ uk ετ ˜ ˜ + (∂IC)ε( ˆ ˆ uk ετ ˜ ˜ ) + h De(Dt uk ετ ) + C(e(uk ετ )−Θ(wk ετ )E) + τ ˛ ˛e(uk ετ ) ˛ ˛γ−2e(uk ετ ) i ν + τβ ` 1+ ˛ ˛ˆ ˆ uk ετ ˜ ˜˛ ˛2´ µ 2 −1ˆ ˆ uk ετ ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC ,

1 2 ` K(wk ετ , e(uk ετ ))∇wk ετ |+ ΓC + K(wk ετ , e(uk ετ ))∇wk ετ |− ΓC ´ · ν + η( ˆ ˆ uk−1 ετ ˜ ˜ ,zk ετ ) ˆ ˆ Θ(wk ετ ) ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC ,

ˆ ˆ K(wk ετ , e(uk ετ ))∇wk ετ ˜ ˜ ν = −ζ(Dt zk ετ )

  • n ΓC .

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Outline of the proof (III)

♦ A priori estimates ♦ Passage to the limit as τ ↓ 0 ♦ Passage to the limit as ε ↓ 0 ⇒ Existence of a solution to the weak formulation

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Outline of the proof (III)

♦ A priori estimates ♦ Passage to the limit as τ ↓ 0 ♦ Passage to the limit as ε ↓ 0 ⇒ Existence of a solution to the weak formulation formally shown on the PDE system

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T),

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

2 κ

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

1 2 ` K(e(u), w)∇w|+

ΓC + K(e(u), w)∇w|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ Θ(w) ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), w)∇w ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Outline of the proof (III)

♦ A priori estimates ♦ Passage to the limit ⇒ Existence of a solution to the weak formulation formally shown on the PDE system

̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F in Ω × (0, T), + Dir. b.c. on ΓD × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ΓN × (0, T),

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G in Ω × (0, T) + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω × (0, T), ˆ ˆ De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)) ˜ ˜ ν = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

(De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

2 κ

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

1 2 ` K(e(u), w)∇w|+

ΓC + K(e(u), w)∇w|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η( ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ , z) ˆ ˆ Θ(w) ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

ˆ ˆ K(e(u), w)∇w ˜ ˜ · ν = ζ(. z)

  • n ΓC × (0, T)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Basic a priori estimates (I)

First estimate ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F ×. u +

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G ×1 + ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 ×. z = total energy balance:

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Basic a priori estimates (I)

First estimate ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F ×. u +

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G ×1 + ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 ×. z = total energy balance: 1 2 Z

̺ |. u(T)|2 dx + Φ ` u(T), z(T) ´ + Z

w(T) dx =1 2 Z

̺ |. u(0)|2 dx + Φ ` u(0), z(0) ´ + Z

w(0) dx + Z T Z

F·. u dxdt + Z T Z

ΓN

f ·. u dSdt + Z T Z

G dxdt + Z T Z

∂Ω

g dSdt

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Basic a priori estimates (I)

First estimate ̺.. u − div ` De(. u) + C ` e(u)−EΘ(w) ´´ = F ×. u +

.

w − div ` K(e(u), w)∇w ´ = De(. u): e(. u) + Θ(w)CE: e(. u) + G ×1 + ∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0 ×. z = total energy balance: 1 2 Z

̺ |. u(T)|2 dx + Φ ` u(T), z(T) ´ + Z

w(T) dx =1 2 Z

̺ |. u(0)|2 dx + Φ ` u(0), z(0) ´ + Z

w(0) dx + Z T Z

F·. u dxdt + Z T Z

ΓN

f ·. u dSdt + Z T Z

G dxdt + Z T Z

∂Ω

g dSdt ⇒ “Energy” a-priori estimates on u, w, z

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Basic a priori estimates (II)

◮ Boccardo-Gallou¨

et estimates on the enthalpy equation & interpolation ⇒ bounds for ∇w

◮ .

w estimated by comparison in the enthalpy equation

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Basic a priori estimates (II)

◮ Boccardo-Gallou¨

et estimates on the enthalpy equation & interpolation ⇒ bounds for ∇w

◮ .

w estimated by comparison in the enthalpy equation

◮ By comparison in the momentum equilibrium equation

˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ Z T Z

̺.. uv + Z T Z

ΓC

∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ v ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ≤ C for all test functions v ⇒ inertial term and subdifferential term CANNOT be estimated

  • separately. Hence we distinguish cases

̺ = 0 & general C vs. ̺ > 0 & linear C

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Basic a priori estimates (II)

◮ Boccardo-Gallou¨

et estimates on the enthalpy equation & interpolation ⇒ bounds for ∇w

◮ .

w estimated by comparison in the enthalpy equation

◮ By comparison in the momentum equilibrium equation

˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ Z T Z

̺.. uv + Z T Z

ΓC

∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ v ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ≤ C for all test functions v ⇒ inertial term and subdifferential term CANNOT be estimated

  • separately. Hence we distinguish cases

̺ = 0 & general C vs. ̺ > 0 & linear C Compactness theorems: strongly/weakly converging (sub)sequences of

  • approx. solutions (un, wn, zn) → (u, w, z)

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Passage to the limit: step (I)

Momentum equation & Semi-stability condition & Total energy inequality

◮ By strong-weak convergences we deduce that (u, w, z) fulfils weak

momentum equation.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Passage to the limit: step (I)

Momentum equation & Semi-stability condition & Total energy inequality

◮ By strong-weak convergences we deduce that (u, w, z) fulfils weak

momentum equation.

◮ Arguing by

◮ lower semicontinuity ◮ recovery sequence trick

we obtain that (u, w, z) fulfils semi-stability condition.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Passage to the limit: step (I)

Momentum equation & Semi-stability condition & Total energy inequality

◮ By strong-weak convergences we deduce that (u, w, z) fulfils weak

momentum equation.

◮ Arguing by

◮ lower semicontinuity ◮ recovery sequence trick

we obtain that (u, w, z) fulfils semi-stability condition.

◮ Lower semicontinuity argument ⇒ total energy inequality.

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Passage to the limit: step (II)

Enthalpy equation

♦ To pass to the limit in

8 > > < > > :

.

wn − div ` K(e(un), wn)∇wn ´ = De( . un): e( . un) + Θ(wn)CE: e( . un) + G Ω, + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω,

1 2

` K(e(un), wn)∇wn|+

ΓC + K(e(un), wn)∇wn|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η([ [un] ], zn)[ [Θ(wn)] ] = 0 ΓC, [ [K(e(un), wn)∇wn] ] · ν = ζ(. zn) ΓC

we need  De( . un): e( . un) → De(. u): e(. u) in L1(0, T; L1(Ω)) ζ(. zn) → hz (measure induced by dissipation ζ) in the sense of measures

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Passage to the limit: step (II)

Enthalpy equation

♦ To pass to the limit in

8 > > < > > :

.

wn − div ` K(e(un), wn)∇wn ´ = De( . un): e( . un) + Θ(wn)CE: e( . un) + G Ω, + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω,

1 2

` K(e(un), wn)∇wn|+

ΓC + K(e(un), wn)∇wn|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η([ [un] ], zn)[ [Θ(wn)] ] = 0 ΓC, [ [K(e(un), wn)∇wn] ] · ν = ζ(. zn) ΓC

we need  De( . un): e( . un) → De(. u): e(. u) in L1(0, T; L1(Ω)) ζ(. zn) → hz (measure induced by dissipation ζ) in the sense of measures ♦ Technical trick: from an additional energy equality deduce convergences for {De( . un): e( . un)} and {ζ(. zn)} via a lim inf / lim sup argument..

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Passage to the limit: step (II)

Enthalpy equation

♦ To pass to the limit in

8 > > < > > :

.

wn − div ` K(e(un), wn)∇wn ´ = De( . un): e( . un) + Θ(wn)CE: e( . un) + G Ω, + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω,

1 2

` K(e(un), wn)∇wn|+

ΓC + K(e(un), wn)∇wn|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η([ [un] ], zn)[ [Θ(wn)] ] = 0 ΓC, [ [K(e(un), wn)∇wn] ] · ν = ζ(. zn) ΓC

we need  De( . un): e( . un) → De(. u): e(. u) in L1(0, T; L1(Ω)) ζ(. zn) → hz (measure induced by dissipation ζ) in the sense of measures ♦ Technical trick: from an additional energy equality deduce convergences for {De( . un): e( . un)} and {ζ(. zn)} via a lim inf / lim sup argument.. ⇒ Conclusion of the proof of existence!

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Passage to the limit: step (II)

Enthalpy equation

♦ To pass to the limit in

8 > > < > > :

.

wn − div ` K(e(un), wn)∇wn ´ = De( . un): e( . un) + Θ(wn)CE: e( . un) + G Ω, + Neu. b.c. on ∂Ω,

1 2

` K(e(un), wn)∇wn|+

ΓC + K(e(un), wn)∇wn|− ΓC

´ ·ν + η([ [un] ], zn)[ [Θ(wn)] ] = 0 ΓC, [ [K(e(un), wn)∇wn] ] · ν = ζ(. zn) ΓC

we need  De( . un): e( . un) → De(. u): e(. u) in L1(0, T; L1(Ω)) ζ(. zn) → hz (measure induced by dissipation ζ) in the sense of measures ♦ Technical trick: from an additional energy equality deduce convergences for {De( . un): e( . un)} and {ζ(. zn)} via a lim inf / lim sup argument.. ⇒ Conclusion of the proof of existence! ♦ Uniqueness not expected due to

◮ nonlinear character of PDE system ◮ rate-independent character of equation for z

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-105
SLIDE 105

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling and analysis of delamination & thermal effects

i.e., anisothermal extension of [Roub´

ıˇ cek–Scardia–Zanini’09]

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling and analysis of delamination & thermal effects

i.e., anisothermal extension of [Roub´

ıˇ cek–Scardia–Zanini’09]

Delamination model: letting κ → +∞ in (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling and analysis of delamination & thermal effects

i.e., anisothermal extension of [Roub´

ıˇ cek–Scardia–Zanini’09]

Delamination model: letting κ → +∞ in (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Hence (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

z ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + ∂zI{z[

[u] ]=0}(

ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ ) − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling and analysis of delamination & thermal effects

i.e., anisothermal extension of [Roub´

ıˇ cek–Scardia–Zanini’09]

Delamination model: letting κ → +∞ in (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Hence (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

z ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + ∂zI{z[

[u] ]=0}(

ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ ) − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Main difficulties:

◮ two nonsmooth operators ∂I[0,1](z) + ∂zI{z[ [u] ]=0}([

[u] ]) in equation for z

◮ (z, [

[u] ]) → I{z[

[u] ]=0}(z, [

[u] ]) is NONCONVEX

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects

slide-109
SLIDE 109

Modeling PDE system: mathematical difficulties Weak formulation Analysis and existence results Open problem

Modeling and analysis of delamination & thermal effects

i.e., anisothermal extension of [Roub´

ıˇ cek–Scardia–Zanini’09]

Delamination model: letting κ → +∞ in (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + 1

˛ ˛ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜˛ ˛2 − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Hence (De(. u) + (Ce(u)−EΘ(w)))|ΓCν + κz ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ + ∂IC `ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜´ ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

z ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ = 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T),

∂ζ(. z) + ∂I[0,1](z) + ∂zI{z[

[u] ]=0}(

ˆ ˆ u ˜ ˜ ) − a0 ∋ 0

  • n ΓC × (0, T).

Main difficulties:

◮ two nonsmooth operators ∂I[0,1](z) + ∂zI{z[ [u] ]=0}([

[u] ]) in equation for z

◮ (z, [

[u] ]) → I{z[

[u] ]=0}(z, [

[u] ]) is NONCONVEX How to pass to the limit in approximate problem???? Work with an even weaker formulation of PDE system????

Riccarda Rossi Analysis of a rate-independent model for adhesive contact with thermal effects