Bioinformatics: Network Analysis Discrete Dynamic Modeling: Boolean - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bioinformatics network analysis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bioinformatics: Network Analysis Discrete Dynamic Modeling: Boolean - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bioinformatics: Network Analysis Discrete Dynamic Modeling: Boolean and Petri Nets COMP 572 (BIOS 572 / BIOE 564) - Fall 2013 Luay Nakhleh, Rice University 1 Gene Regulatory Networks Well illustrate some of the graphical models using


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bioinformatics: Network Analysis

Discrete Dynamic Modeling: Boolean and Petri Nets

COMP 572 (BIOS 572 / BIOE 564) - Fall 2013 Luay Nakhleh, Rice University

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Gene Regulatory Networks

✤ We’ll illustrate some of the graphical models using gene regulatory

networks (GRNs).

✤ Gene regulatory networks describe the molecules involved in gene

regulation, as well as their interactions.

✤ Transcription factors are stimulated by upstream signaling cascades

and bind on cis-regulatory positions of their target genes.

✤ Bound transcription factors promote or inhibit RNA polymerase

assembly and thus determine whether and to what extent the target gene is expressed.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Gene Regulatory Networks

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Outline

✤ Graph representation ✤ Boolean networks ✤ Petri nets

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Graph Representation

✤ A directed graph G=(V,E) is a tuple where V denotes a set of vertices

(or nodes) and E a set of edges.

✤ An edge (i,j) in E indicates that i regulates the expression of j. ✤ Edges can have information about interactions. For example, (i,j,+) for

“i activates j” and (i,j,-) for “i inhibits j”.

✤ Annotated directed graphs are the most commonly available type of

data for regulatory networks.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Graph Representation

✤ Directed graphs do not suffice to describe the dynamics of a network, but they may

contain information that allows certain predictions about network properties:

✤ Tracing paths between genes yields sequences of regulatory events, shows

redundancy in the regulation, or indicates missing regulatory interactions (that are, for example, known from experiments).

✤ A cycle may indicate feedback regulation. ✤ Comparison of GRNs of different organisms may reveal evolutionary relations

and targets for bioengineering and pharmaceutical applications.

✤ The network complexity can be measured by the connectivity. 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Graph Representation

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Boolean Networks

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Boolean Networks

✤ Boolean networks are qualitative descriptions of gene regulatory

interactions

✤ Gene expression has two states: on (1) and off (0) ✤ Let x be an n-dimensional binary vector representing the state of a

system of n genes

✤ Thus, the state space of the system consists of 2n possible states

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Boolean Networks

✤ Each component, xi, determines the expression of the ith gene ✤ With each gene i we associate a Boolean rule, bi ✤ Given the input variables for gene i at time t, this function determines

whether the regulated element is active (1) or inactive (0) at time t+1, i.e.,

xi(t + 1) = bi(x(t)), 1 ≤ i ≤ n

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Boolean Networks

✤ The practical feasibility of Boolean networks is heavily dependent on

the number of input variables, k, for each gene

✤ The number of possible input states of k inputs is 2k ✤ For each such combination, a specific Boolean function must

determine whether the next state would be on or off

✤ Thus, there are 22k possible Boolean functions (or rules) ✤ This number rapidly increases with the connectivity

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Boolean Networks

✤ In a Boolean network each state has a deterministic output state ✤ A series of states is called a trajectory ✤ If no difference occurs between the transitions of two states, i.e.,

  • utput state equals input state, then the system is in a point attractor

✤ Point attractors are analogous to steady states ✤ If the system is in a cycle of states, then we have a dynamic attractor

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Boolean Networks

✤ Since the number of states in the state space is finite, the number of

possible transitions is also finite.

✤ Therefore, each trajectory will lead either to a steady state or to a state

  • cycle. These state sequences are called attractors.

✤ Transient states are those states that do not belong to an attractor. ✤ All states that lead to the same attractor constitute its basin of

attraction.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Boolean Networks

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Boolean Networks

✤ The temporal behavior is

determined by the sequence of states (a,b,c,d) given in an initial state.

✤ What happens if the initial

state of a is 0? If the initial state

  • f a is 1?

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Boolean Networks

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Boolean Networks: The REVEAL Algorithm

“REVEAL, A general reverse engineering algorithm for inference of genetic network architectures” Liang et al., PSB 1998

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Petri Nets

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Three Major Ways of Modeling

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

✤ Biochemical reaction systems are inherently (1) bipartite, (2)

concurrent, and (3) stochastic

✤ Stochastic Petri nets have all these three characteristics ✤ Analyzing stochastic Petri nets is very hard ✤ Two abstractions are used: qualitative models (removing time

dependencies) and continuous models (approximating stochasticity by determinism)

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Outline

✤ The qualitative approach: Petri nets ✤ The stochastic approach: Stochastic Petri nets ✤ The continuous approach: Continuous Petri nets

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Qualitative Approach

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Petri Nets

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Petri Nets

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Petri Nets

✤ Places model passive system components, such as conditions, species,

  • r chemical compounds

✤ Transitions model active system components, such as atomic actions,

  • r any kind of chemical reactions (phosphorylation,

dephospohorylation, etc.)

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Petri Nets

✤ In the most abstract way, a concentration can be thought of as being

‘high’ or ‘low’ (‘present’ or ‘absent’)

✤ This boolean approach can be generalized to any continuous

concentration range by dividing the range into a finite number of equally sized sub-ranges (equivalence classes), so that the concentrations within each sub-range can be considered equivalent

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Petri Nets

✤ A particular arrangement of tokens over the places of the net is called

a marking, modeling a system state

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Petri Net Notations

✤ m(p) is the number of tokens on place p in the marking m ✤ A place p with m(p)=0 is called clean in m; otherwise, it is called

marked

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Petri Net Notations

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Petri Net Notations

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Petri Net Semantics

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Petri Net Semantics

✤ The repeated firing of transitions establishes the behavior of the Petri

net

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Petri Net Semantics

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Petri Nets: Reachability and State Space

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Modeling of a MAPK Signaling Pathway Using a Petri Net

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Basic Building Blocks

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Modeling of a MAPK Signaling Pathway Using a Petri Net

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Analyzing Properties of Petri Nets

Beside simulating a Petri net, by observing the flow of tokens, formal analyses of Petri net properties help reveal properties of the underlying biochemical system that is being modeled

Analyses include

General behavioral properties

Structural properties

Static decision of marking-independent behavioral properties

Initial marking construction

Static decision of marking-dependent behavioral properties

Dynamic decision of behavioral properties

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • 1. General Behavioral Properties

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • 1. General Behavioral Properties

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • 1. General Behavioral Properties

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • 3. Static Decision of Marking-

independent Behavioral Properties

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • 3. Static Decision of Marking-

independent Behavioral Properties

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • 3. Static Decision of Marking-

independent Behavioral Properties

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • 3. Static Decision of Marking-

independent Behavioral Properties

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • 3. Static Decision of Marking-

independent Behavioral Properties

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • 4. Initial Marking Construction

The following criteria are considered in a systematic construction of the initial marking

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • 6. Dynamic Decision of Behavioral

Properties

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • 6. Dynamic Decision of Behavioral

Properties

If the reachability graph can be constructed explicitly, then many properties of the Petri net can be tested easily However, the reachability graph of a Petri net modeling almost any realistic system tends to be huge (the state explosion problem)

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

The Stochastic Approach

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

✤ Each place maintains a discrete number of tokens ✤ A firing rate (waiting time) is associated with each transition t, which

are random variables Xt∈[0,∞), defined by probability distributions

✤ When a transition is enabled, a timer is set, and starts decreasing at a

constant rate. When the timer value is 0, the transition fires

Stochastic Petri Nets

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Stochastic Petri Nets

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Stochastic Petri Nets

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Stochastic Petri Net Semantics

✤ Transitions become enabled as usual, i.e., if all preplaces are

sufficiently marked

✤ However, there is a time, which has to elapse, before an enabled

transition t fires

✤ The transition’s waiting time is an exponentially distributed random

variable Xt with the probability density function

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Stochastic Petri Net Semantics

✤ Specialized biochemically interpreted stochastic Petri nets can be

defined by specifying the required kind of stochastic hazard function

✤ Two examples ✤ Stochastic mass-action hazard function, which tailors the general SPN

definition to biochemical mass-action networks, where tokens correspond to molecules

✤ Stochastic level hazard function, which tailors the general SPN

definition to biochemical mass-action networks, where tokens correspond to concentration levels

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Stochastic Petri Net Semantics: Stochastic Mass-action Hazard Function

where ct is the transition specific stochastic rate constant, and m(p) is the current number of tokens on the preplace p of transition t. The binomial coefficient describes the number of unordered combinations of the f(p,t) molecules, required for the reaction, out of the m(p) available ones

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Stochastic Petri Net Semantics: Stochastic Level Hazard Function

where kt is the transition specific deterministic rate constant, and N is the number of the highest level.

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

The Continuous Approach

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

✤ The marking of a place is no longer an integer, but a positive real

number, called token value, which can be interpreted as the concentration of the species modeled by the place

✤ The instantaneous firing of a transition is carried out like a continuous

flow

Continuous Petri Nets

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Continuous Petri Nets

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Continuous Petri Nets

✤ Note that a firing rate may be negative, in which case the reaction

takes place in the reverse direction

✤ This feature is commonly used to model reversible reactions by just

  • ne transition, where positive firing rates correspond to the forward

direction, and negative ones to the backward direction

61

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Continuous Petri Net Semantics

✤ Each continuous marking is a place vector, containing |P| non-

negative real values, and m(p) yields the marking on place p, which is a real number

✤ A continuous transition t is enabled in m, if for every preplace p of t,

we have m(p)>0

✤ Due to the influence of time, a continuous transition is forced to fire as

soon as possible

62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Continuous Petri Net Semantics

✤ The semantics of a continuous Petri net is defined by a system of

ODEs, whereby one equation describes the continuous change over time on the token value of a given place by the continuous increase of its pretransitions’ flow and the continuous decrease of its posttransitions’ flow

✤ In other words, each place p gets its own equation

63

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Tools for Petri Nets

✤ Snoopy: design, animate, and simulate qualitative, stochastic, and

continuous Petri nets

http://www-dssz.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/index.html?/software/snoopy.html

✤ Charlie: analyzes properties of Petri nets

http://www-dssz.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/software/charlie/charlie.html

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Acknowledgments

✤ Materials in this lecture are based on

✤ “Systems Biology in Practice: Concepts, Implementation and

Applications”, by E. Klipp et al., Wiley-VCH, 1st Edition, 2nd Reprint, 2006.

✤ “Petri Nets for Systems and Synthetic Biology”, by M. Heiner,

  • D. Gilbert, and R. Donaldson, SFM 2008, LNCS 5016, 215-264,

2008.

65