SLIDE 1 CAD/PAD Laser Ignitability Programs at the Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center
- Mr. Tom Blachowski
- Mr. Travis Thom
Indian Head Division Naval Surface Warfare Center 2010 SAFE – Europe 30 - 31 March 2010
SLIDE 2 Overview
Two laser ignitability programs will be discussed
- NACES USRM (MK123 Mod 0/MK124 Mod 0) Effort
- U. S. Navy – NACES (Navy Common Aircrew Ejection Seat)
USRM (Underseat Rocket Motor) Evaluate laser ignitability characteristics of USRM propellents
- ACES-II Rocket Catapult Effort
U.S. Air Force – ACES-II (Advanced Concept Ejection Seat) New alternative propellent development effort IHDIV, NSWC Current Capability to conduct other laser ignitability efforts
SLIDE 3
System Function
NACES Ejection Seat Test – F-14 Configuration – 15 Sep 1989 – NAWC CL
SLIDE 4
System Function
MK123 Mod 0 / MK124 Mod 0 Underseat Rocket Motor
NACES Ejection Seat
SLIDE 5 Laser Ignitability Test Approach
For all IHDIV, NSWC Laser Ignitability efforts, a consistent approach test methodology has been adopted
- A Carbon Dioxide (CO ) laser is utilized to supply a uniform heat input
to the energetic material under test
- For the IHDIV test methodology, four differing laser input power levels are
established and then, by varying the laser input pulse duration, assessments
- f the Time to First Light and the 50% Ignitability Thresholds are completed
- The “pass/fail” criteria for the 50% Ignitability Thresholds are a
determined if a “Sustained” combustion or an “Unsustained” combustion reaction is apparent at the completion of the laser pulse
2
SLIDE 6 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Program
- The primary objective of the NACES USRM effort was to evaluate
any potential differences between the laser ignition thresholds for KU and Mechanite 19 double base propellents at ambient and at cold temperatures.
- Specifically, this evaluation includes comparing both the 50% Ignition
Threshold and the Time to First Light (or Ignition Delay) parameters at ambient and cold temperatures for the two propellents.
- All tests were conducted at atmospheric pressure.
- Cold temperature for this test series was defined as conditioning each
sample to -75 F (-60 C) in the dewar and conducting the specific laser functional test within 15 seconds of the dewar and sample being removed from the chamber.
SLIDE 7 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Program
Dewar Cover Dewar
Sample Holder
Dewar Cover Dewar
Sample Holder
SLIDE 8 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
Example of a “Go” Test Result
Sustained Combustion Unsustained Combustion
Example of a “No Go” Test Result
The spatial power distribution from the laser was not uniform as evident in the “No Go”
- sample. However, this aspect was consistent throughout this test program.
SLIDE 9 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
Time to First Light vs Laser Flux 10 100 10 100 1000 Laser Flux (W/cm^2) Time to First Light (ms)
Mechanite 19 (70°F) Mechanite 19 (-75°F) KU (70°F) KU (-75°F)
SLIDE 10 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
Energy to First Light vs Laser Flux 1 10 10 100 1000 Laser Flux (W/cm^2) Energy to First Light (J/cm^2)
Mechanite 19 (70°F) Mechanite 19 (-75°F) KU (70°F) KU (-75°F)
SLIDE 11 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
50% Ignition vs Laser Flux 100 1000 10 100 1000 Laser Flux (W/cm^2) 50% Ignition (ms)
Mechanite 19 (70°F) Mechanite 19 (-75°F) KU (70°F) KU (-75°F)
SLIDE 12 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
50% Ignition Energy vs Laser Flux
10 100 10 100 1000 Laser Flux (W/cm^2) 50% Ignition Energy (J/cm^2)
Mechanite 19 (70°F) Mechanite 19 (-75°F) KU (70°F) KU (-75°F)
SLIDE 13 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
- As expected, both the KU and the Mechanite 19 double base propellents
exhibited required significantly increased laser input power levels at low temperature to achieve sustained combustion.
- And as expected, both the KU and the Mechanite 19 double base
propellents demonstrated significantly longer reaction times at low temperature than the reaction times at ambient temperature. Both propellents experienced “quenching” events when tested at -75 F (-60 C) temperatures. “Quenching” is defined as a single test result where the input parameters (laser input power and pulse duration) resulted in a “Sustained Combustion” result; however, when the flame front reached the top of the brass sample holder, the reaction was halted.
SLIDE 14
NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
Ash Unburned propellant Brass sample holder Ash Unburned propellant Brass sample holder
Example of a “Quenched” Test Result
SLIDE 15 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Results
Sample Quenching Events
KU Propellent Mechanite 19 Propellent 10W
None of 9 20W
None of 10 30W of 10 None of 9 40W of 10 of 9
SLIDE 16 NACES Laser Ignitability Test Summary
- For both the Mechanite 19 and the KU double base propellents,
significantly higher laser input levels were required to achieve sustained combustion and the Time to First Light (Ignition Delay) times were significantly longer at cold temperature that at ambient temperature
- The Mechanite 19 propellent results exhibited higher standard
deviations than the standard deviation of the KU propellent test results
- The propellent “Quenching” event was unexpected and it has been
recommended that further investigation into this event be conducted
SLIDE 17
ACES-II System Operation
ACES-II Ejection Seat F-16 Thunderbird Ejection 14 Sep 03 Cockpit Video Pilot was not seriously injured
SLIDE 18
ACES–II System Operation
Video of CKU-5C/A Test – F-15, 600KEAS, HMTF – 10 Jul 04
SLIDE 19
ACES-II System Test Operation
CKU-5C/A Rocket Catapult Test – HMTF 18 June 2009
SLIDE 20
ACES-II System Test Operation
CKU-5C/A Rocket Catapult Test – HMTF 18 June 2009
SLIDE 21 ACES-II System Components
ACES-II Ejection Seat A - Advanced C - Concept E - Ejection S - Seat
IHDIV, NSWC manufactured IHDIV, NSWC manufactured
ACES-II Ejection Seat currently in use on USAF A-10, F-15, F-16, B-1, & B-2 aircraft
SLIDE 22
ACES-II System Function
ACES-II Ejection Seat CKU-5C/A Rocket Catapult
SLIDE 23 ACES-II System Function
CCU-22B/A Impulse Cartridge Installed in the CKU-5C/A
- Gas Inlet at Breech Actuates
CCU-22B/A Impulse Cartridge
- Dual Firing Pins and Primers
- BKNO Charge
- Composite Propellant Grain
produces High Pressure
- Internal Locking Mechanism
releases Catapult Tubes
- Catapult Extends Lifting Seat
from Cockpit
3
SLIDE 24 ACES-II System Function
- Catapult Gas Initiates Auxiliary Igniter
- BKNO and Propellant Chips in
High Density Polyethylene Cup
- Rocket Motor Propellant Grain
ignites and Produces Sustaining thrust
- Catapult Booster Tube Separates and
Remains in the Aircraft
3
Nozzles Rocket Thrust Exhaust
SLIDE 25 CKU-5C/A Catapult Effort
Primary Objective of the Laser Ignitability effort for the ACES-II CKU-5C/A Rocket Catapult Alternative Propellent was:
- To establish the 50% Ignition Threshold and Time to First Light
values for each differing composite (HTPB) propellent configuration These data points provided the system design engineers a rapid, low-cost preliminary evaluation to various differing HTPB propellent configurations
SLIDE 26 CKU-5C/A Laser Ignitability Test Results
Laser Spot Laser Spot
Example of CKU-5C/A Propellent “Sustained” Reaction - GO Example of CKU-5C/A Propellent “Unsustained” Reaction – NO GO
SLIDE 27
CKU-5C/A Laser Ignitability Test Results
Example of CKU-5C/A Propellent – “Sustained” Combustion
SLIDE 28 CKU-5C/A Laser Ignitability Test Results
CKU-5 Laser Ignition
y = 7757.6x-1.0801 R2 = 0.9989
1 10 100 100 1000 Laser Power (watts/cm2) Time to 50% Ignition (msec)
0020 Baseline
Example of Typical Results of CKU-5C/A Propellent Testing
SLIDE 29
CKU-5C/A Laser Ignitability Test Summary
Summary: Over 10 alternative propellent formulations were evaluated utilizing this laser ignitability methodology (800+ tests). One of these propellent batches (IHDIV S/N -0020) very nearly matched the Time to 50% Ignition performance of the older CTPB propellent Therefore, the Sensitivity (or the 50% Ignition Threshold) and the Reactivity (Time to First Light or Ignition Delay) of this new propellent batch very nearly matched the performance of the older CTPB propellent Based on this data, in addition to other elements, sub-components and full-scale CKU-5C/A Rocket Catapults, utilizing the new HTPB propellent were fabricated and tested at IHDIV, NSWC All of these test results, both sub-component and full-scale, demonstrated that the selected HTPB propellent was capable of achieving system requirements
SLIDE 30
Upgraded Capability
200W CO2 Laser Test Chamber 200W CO2 Laser Test Chamber
New Laser New Test Cell
SLIDE 31 Conclusions
- The IHDIV, NSWC Laser Ignition capability has successfully
contributed to a series of design programs and on-going investigations
- NACES USRM double base propellents (KU and Mechanite 19)
exhibited consistent laser ignitability characteristics at ambient and at low temperature – “Quenching” effect requires additional investigation
- ACES-II CKU-5C/A Rocket Catapult, utilizing new HTPB propellent,
successfully introduced into fleet
- The IHDIV, NWSC Laser Ignition capability has been upgraded
and is being continually utilized to support a wide range of CAD/PAD efforts