Census Participation Motivators and Barriers through Focus Groups - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

census participation motivators and barriers through
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Census Participation Motivators and Barriers through Focus Groups - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hope, Fear, and Political Efficacy: Exploring 2020 Census Participation Motivators and Barriers through Focus Groups with Non-English Speakers, Puerto Ricans, Small Race and Ethnic Groups, and other Audiences Sarah Evans 1 , Anna Sandoval Girn


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2020CENSUS.GOV

Hope, Fear, and Political Efficacy: Exploring 2020 Census Participation Motivators and Barriers through Focus Groups with Non-English Speakers, Puerto Ricans, Small Race and Ethnic Groups, and other Audiences

AAPOR Annual Conference May 18, 2019

Sarah Evans1, Anna Sandoval Girón2, Jenna Levy1, & Jennifer Miller Gonzalez1

1

2

Disclaimer: Any views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau. The results published in this paper have undergone disclosure avoidance review and were released with approval CBDRB-FY19-043.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2020CENSUS.GOV

Outline

2

1. Overview 2. Methodology 3. Analytic Approach 4. Key Findings 5. Communication Implications and Next Steps

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2020CENSUS.GOV

Overview

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2020CENSUS.GOV

Study Overview

Purpose

  • Primary goal of informing messaging for communications about the forthcoming census
  • Provide insights into the barriers, attitudes, motivators, and knowledge gaps that the communications campaign will

need to address in order to motivate self-response to the 2020 Census

Research Questions

1. What themes and messages should drive communications directed at various audiences, including rural and urban residents and racial/ethnic/language groups, to increase participation in the 2020 Census? 2. What motivators should be leveraged to encourage participation in the 2020 Census among audiences? 3. What barriers to 2020 Census participation exist among audiences? 4. What information is effective to inform audiences and address misconceptions about the 2020 Census?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2020CENSUS.GOV

Methodology

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2020CENSUS.GOV

Study Design

2020 CBAMS Focus Groups held in March and April 2018.

  • 42 focus groups conducted with 11 audiences across 14 locations
  • 90 minute sessions
  • 16 focus groups were conducted in non-English languages
  • Interpreters assisted focus group observers by providing real-time translations of non-English language

groups

  • Participants received an honorarium to offset the costs of participating

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2020CENSUS.GOV

Audiences

2020 CBAMS Focus Groups were conducted among 11 audiences.

7

American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) Black or African American Chinese – Cantonese and Mandarin Low Internet Proficiency Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) Rural Spanish speakers (Puerto Rico) Spanish speakers (U.S. Mainland) Vietnamese Young and Mobile

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2020CENSUS.GOV

Participant Recruitment Criteria

In addition to meeting audience-specific criteria, all participants must meet a minimum of two risk factors associated with nonresponse to the Census:

  • Rents home
  • Lives in household with young children (ages four years old or younger)
  • Low household income (less than $35,000/year)
  • Lives in large household (more than six people in household)
  • Moved in the past year
  • Female householder, no husband
  • Low education (less than a high school diploma)
  • Multi-unit or mobile home structure

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2020CENSUS.GOV

14 Locations

9

  • Albuquerque, NM
  • Anchorage, AK
  • Bristol, TN
  • Cayey, PR
  • Chicago, IL
  • Detroit, MI
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Houston, TX
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Memphis, TN
  • Montgomery, AL
  • New York, NY
  • Rapid City, SD
  • San Juan, PR
slide-10
SLIDE 10

2020CENSUS.GOV

Analytic Approach

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2020CENSUS.GOV

Analytic Approach

  • Transcripts were analyzed using a coding methodology to identify themes among response barriers and

motivators

  • Rigorous and systematic coding of the transcripts using NVivo, a qualitative data analysis program
  • Coding calibration process ensured approximately 20% of the transcripts would be coded by more than
  • ne team member
  • Calibration quantified by kappas1
  • Final kappa equaled 0.82

11

1Kappa is a statistic that measures interrater agreement. Reaching a kappa of 0.75 is a widely accepted threshold for “substantial

agreement” for qualitative coding of this nature (Viera & Garrett, 2005).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2020CENSUS.GOV

Key Findings

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2020CENSUS.GOV

Barriers: Lack of Knowledge

  • General knowledge of the purpose, content,

and execution of the census is relatively limited

  • Substantial barriers to self-response

associated with lack of knowledge

  • Other prominent barriers correspond with, but

are not entirely explained by, a lack of knowledge

13

[What comes to mind when I hear ‘census’?] I don’t know. Isn’t that like the people that want to know like everything? They send you letters to your house.” — AIAN participant

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2020CENSUS.GOV

Barriers: Apathy and Lack Efficacy

  • Many did not believe it mattered if they or their families were counted in the census
  • Results were unclear and many felt any benefits were unlikely to touch their communities

14

They won’t ever come into the hood, give us stuff that we need, or give us anything. You go out where she at [a suburb] and you see parks and they get cleaned up, you see areas and centers and everything. Well, we have none of that. That’s why I see a thousand kids on the block every day…So many high schools been

  • closed. [It’s connected to the census] because they not helping.

They not giving us no money. Then they up there counting, taking counts for everybody for what?” — Black or African American participant [I would not fill out the census because] I just don’t care.” — Chinese participant

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2020CENSUS.GOV

Barriers: Distrust of Government

  • Quick to question the trustworthiness of the government in

general and the Census Bureau by extension

  • Did not believe the government would do the right thing with

their data

  • Skeptical when moderators shared the Census Bureau’s

promise of confidentiality

  • Were not convinced that the government would not use their

answers against them

15

[The government will sell personal information] in a heartbeat.” — Rural participant The U.S. Census Bureau is connected to the U.S. government. I don’t trust the government not one bit, so I wouldn’t even if they told me this is what we’re going to do I wouldn’t.” — Black or African American participant The government has always been intrusive as it is, and it’s probably a level of intrusion. That’s why people are like, ‘Hold on, what you want to know what’s in my bed, at my house, and who’s using my toilet? You should go mind your business.’” — NHPI participant

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2020CENSUS.GOV

Barriers: Confidentiality Concerns

  • Participants were often confused about the

scope of the census

  • Many believed that the census asked for their

Social Security numbers, which they were reluctant to provide

  • Fear that the Census Bureau would share

information with other agencies, a common misconception

16

Every single scrap of information that the government gets goes to every single intelligence agency, that’s how it works…individual level

  • data. Like, the city government gets

information and then the FBI and then the CIA and then ICE and military…” — MENA participant

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2020CENSUS.GOV

Barriers: Fear of Repercussions

  • Many participants believed that their answers would be

used against their community

  • Potential to see limited funding in a community due to

demographic composition

  • Harm to individuals in the form of punishment for a

legal violation or, in the case of noncitizens, deportation

17

They could say, ‘Look, this community has, like, X amount of race or something; let’s avoid them,

  • r let’s define that area’… you can

see it sometimes where they don’t fund certain schools because it’s in certain ‘bad areas.’” — MENA participant [Someone might choose not to participate because] it can come back and haunt them...Like if you get food stamps, ...and they will be afraid that it's going to affect their food stamps if they report somebody else is there.” — NHPI participant [I would not participate in the census because] they [immigration] will know where we are and what our names are and where we live…” — Spanish-speaking (U.S. Mainland) participant

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2020CENSUS.GOV

Barriers: Citizenship Question

The citizenship question may be a major barrier for people who believe…

  • 1. Its purpose is to find undocumented immigrants
  • 2. The political discourse is targeting their ethnic group – residents and citizens may also feel endangered

18

[The purpose is] to make people panic… Some people will panic because they are afraid that they might be deported.” — Vietnamese participant ICE is working with different groups on deportation sweeps, and it would make me feel like I’m aiding in that. They’re doing a lot of illegal stuff, and so I wouldn’t fill

  • ut any of the questions.”

— MENA participant For this census, a lot of people are afraid. It doesn’t matter if they ask you whether or not you’re a citizen. The first question they ask you, are you Hispanic or Latino? And that’s enough. That’s all they need. And people are scared.” — Spanish-speaking (U.S. Mainland) participant [Latinos will not participate]

  • ut of fear…[there] is practically

a hunt [for us] …Latinos are going to be afraid to be counted because of the retaliation that could happen - it's like giving the government information, saying, ‘Oh, there are more here.’” — Spanish-speaking (U.S. Mainland) participant

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2020CENSUS.GOV

Motivators: Community Funding

  • The most powerful motivator for all audiences was knowing that the 2020 Census will help

determine funding for their communities ‒ Specifically related to widely enjoyed services such as schools, hospitals, and fire departments

19

“[I’d fill out the form] maybe for funding. Well, that’s part of the hope, as well. [Hopefully this would lead to] funding and improvements in the areas.” — Black or African American participant “If they could include a letter like they’re saying that tells you what they use it for and then show some examples of what good has come from it in previous years…like the grants and, you know…encourage people that didn’t want to do it to do it.” — Rural participant

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2020CENSUS.GOV

Motivators: Community Funding

Conditions that need to be met to be most compelling:

  • 1. Information about the census and its impact
  • 2. Tangible evidence
  • 3. Connection to a better future

20

[I would fill it out] because that data is going to impact my

  • community. And if it’s not my

community, because I die, then my grandchildren and my children.” — Spanish-speaking (U.S. Mainland) participant Our schools need help. The schools here do need help. It hasn’t been that long since the school system was shook up pretty bad, so it does need help, and I don’t know about the fire departments.” — Low Internet Proficiency participant

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2020CENSUS.GOV

Communication Implications/Next Steps

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2020CENSUS.GOV

Communication Implications

  • Low knowledge, apathy, and lack of efficacy pose significant communication challenges
  • Critical to ensure that people understand the purpose, content, and process of the census
  • People need to be assured and reassured that participation is safe
  • Census participation needs to be framed as important and desirable both for the community

now and for future generations

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2020CENSUS.GOV

Next Steps and Applications

  • Provided a foundation for the creative strategy and campaign platform
  • Continue to collaborate with key stakeholders to apply the insights from this research to the

development of and the integrated communications campaign

  • Teams continue to reference this research as part of a broader research program during

audience-specific creative development and, soon, during post-testing refinement phases

23