Child Find Teams CELEBRATE! Colorado Department of Education - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

child find teams celebrate
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Child Find Teams CELEBRATE! Colorado Department of Education - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Child Find Teams CELEBRATE! Colorado Department of Education Puentes CulturalesClara Prez Mndez & Susan M.Moore The contents of this workshop were developed partly under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education. However, those


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Child Find Teams CELEBRATE!

Colorado Department of Education Puentes Culturales…Clara Pérez Méndez & Susan M.Moore

The contents of this workshop were developed partly under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education. However, those contents do not necessarily represent The policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume Endorsement by the Federal Government.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • 8:30 ~ Welcome & Networking: Bring Your Coffee!
  • 9:00 ~ Updates from CF Teams & Discussion
  • 10:15 ~ BREAK
  • 10:30 ~ Necessary & Sufficient: Criteria for IEP Reviews ~ Chris Miller, CDE
  • 11:00 ~ Activity: Review a sample IEP …Discussion
  • 11:30 ~ Are you accountable to your stakeholders? ~Documenting your success!
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

  • 12:00 ~ Working Lunch ~ Share your forms…Resources & Updates
  • 12:45 ~ Roundtable Conversation with Cultural Representatives
  • 2:15 ~ Break
  • 2:30 ~ “Next Steps” Team Action Planning/Quick Exit Survey
  • 3:00 ~ Adios! Gracias! Thank you!
slide-4
SLIDE 4

TEAM PRESENTATIONS

  • Think it Through…What works? What do we need to address? Next Steps?
  • Use your note-taking sheets…
  • Allow us to share your ideas and process and handouts with other teams and

let’s post on CDE website!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

“Necessary & Sufficient”

  • Continuous Improvement
  • Collaborative Monitoring Process in Student Records
  • Data Elements Review in Student Records Related to Evaluation and IEPS
  • Preschool Eligibility
  • Questions… Discussion… Practice
slide-6
SLIDE 6

How do you know what you are doing is working?

  • Who are your stakeholders?
  • What do you want to know from each to inform your practice?
  • How will you gather information? Phone calls?… Periodic focus groups?

Surveys? Post evaluation interviews for quick feedback? (Did you get your questions answered? Do you know what happens next for your child?)

  • Other options?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Who are your stakeholders?

  • Parents and Families and their Children
  • Teachers
  • Cultural Mediators, Interpreters & Translators
  • Other Team Members
  • District/BOCES Administrators
  • CDE
  • What are your ????s.
  • The questions might change…
slide-8
SLIDE 8

DATA-Based Decision Making Based on Feedback from Stakeholders

Data from various stakeholders about their satisfaction and “new learning” associated with an assessment process for a child is one way to inform our team practices and make changes as deemed necessary.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Methods To Collect MEANINGFUL Data..

  • There are many methods to collect data from stakeholders that can be very

helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of any program including your Child Find team’s evaluation and assessment processes . These can include: interviews; phone surveys; electronic surveys on follow-up; focus groups, internal/ external record audits; and surveys and questionnaires completed by your stakeholders.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Surveys and Questionnaires

  • We have compiled a limited selection of surveys and questionnaires as

samples for parent and family feedback and team based self reflection of practice about the assessment process. The KEY in determining usefulness

  • f any survey is in the meaningfulness and relevance of the questions you

are asking framed based upon guiding principles and/or what YOUR team wants to know.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

WHO?…WHAT?…WHEN?

  • Select a stakeholder group
  • Frame your questions based upon what you want to know… Quality of service

provided? Relevance? Usefulness? “Next Steps”

  • Determine format that works & Discuss timing of distribution
  • USE THE FEEDBACK TO INFORM YOUR PROCESS
slide-12
SLIDE 12

One Example: Family Feedback on the Process

4.76 4.72 4.89 4.72

1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 Family-Centered Practice Play-Based Assessment Culturally Responsive Assessment Transdisciplinary Team Approach Ratings

Survey Responses (Based on 4 Components) (Family Feedback )

Average Responses (n=27) Key Strongly Agree = 5 Agree = 4 Unsure = 3 Disagree = 2 Strongly Disagree = 1

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Protocols and Check Lists to Share…

  • We are asking that each team briefly review the purpose and use of their paper

work and protocols so that you can talk about these and can discuss over

  • lunch. Opps! What forms that you or your team uses work for you and why?

Thank you all for sharing your information, what you have developed, checklists, procedures with others in this team-based learning experience!

slide-14
SLIDE 14

It’s Time 4 Lunch

LUNCH TALK!

Great conversations result in great outcomes…! It takes as long as it takes!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Learning from Conversations about Culture

  • Roundtable Discussions: We have set up roundtables with representatives from

diverse cultures who can provide information to inform your practice…

  • Clara will explain the process so all get a chance to hear from each

representative

  • Danger of Assumptions! Remember, just because a family identifies with a

certain culture, religion, or background, we cannot assume that they follow all the traditional beliefs associated with that culture, religious beliefs or

  • background. We can however, increase our knowledge and therefore be better

prepared yet do not assume the knowledge applies until we ask.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Resources & Updates for your Practice

  • We were asked to review updates on “dynamic assessment”…
  • Also go to www.puentesculturales.com for references and resources
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Updates ~ See Handouts for Today www.puentesculturales.com

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LENA: Another Promising Practice

  • www.lenababy.com
  • Assessing the natural language environment…
  • Schaller,S., Wiggins, M., & Moore, S., (2013) Assessment of Speech and

Language Environment as Part of Transdiciplinary Assessment…A Presentation at the International LENA Conference, Denver, Co. April 2013.

  • Also a terrific parent focused video …
  • Parents on LENA Start

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEmWLNsNo60&feature=youtu.be&t=131

slide-19
SLIDE 19

APPLIED RESEARCH

  • LENA yields a comparison of adult word count, turn-taking, child

vocalizations, throughout the day using a digital language processor and LENA PRO software.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

McArthur Communicative Development Inventory

  • This study compares lexical access and expressive and receptive vocabulary development

in monolingual and bilingual toddlers. More specifically, the link between vocabulary size, production of translation equivalents, and lexical access in bilingual infants was

  • measured. Twenty-five bilingual and 18 monolingual infants aged 24 months participated

in this study. The results revealed significant differences between monolingual and bilinguals’ expressive vocabulary size in L1 but similar total vocabularies. Performance on the Computerized Comprehension Task revealed no differences between the two groups

  • n measures of both reaction time and accuracy, and a strong convergent validity of the

Computerized Comprehension Task with the Communicative Development Inventories was observed for both groups. Bilinguals with a higher proportion of translation equivalents in their expressive vocabulary showed faster access to words in the Computerized Comprehension Task.

Poulin-Bubois et al., (2013) Lexical access and vocabulary development in very young bilinguals, International Journal of Bilingualism, Vol.17,No.1.57-70

slide-21
SLIDE 21

McArthur CDI ~ Capture parents’ knowledge of their child’s emerging

language skills

  • Use the CDI to get a reliable view of a child’s communicative

development

  • The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories

(CDIs), and the corresponding Spanish-language Inventarios, provide a systematic way for professionals to use parents as informants regarding their child’s language. They enable professionals to tap into parents knowledge about their young children’s communicative development for use in screening and developing a prognosis for children with language

  • delays. It also ensures they are meeting mandates for including parent

input in child evaluation procedures.

  • The goal of the CDIs is to yield reliable information on the course of

language development from children’s early signs of comprehension, to their first nonverbal gestural signals, to the expansion of early vocabulary and the beginnings of grammar.

http://www.brookespublishing.com/resource-center/screening-and-assessment/cdi/

slide-22
SLIDE 22

/Wordbank_An open database of children's vocabulary development.html

  • Wordbank contains 42078 CDI administrations,

across 15 languages and 26 instruments:

  • Russian, Danish, Spanish, Hebrew, German, Italian, British, Sign Language,

Turkish, Norwegian, French (Quebec)

  • Provide vocabulary norms
  • Provides cross –linguistic trajectories
  • http://wordbank.stanford.edu/
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Norms

All Data (n = 4797) 200 400 600 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

Age (months) Size of Productive Vocabulary Quantile

0.90 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.10
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Current Research

  • “So, here’s a summary of what I’ve found recently.” Liz Peña
  • Kapantzoglou, Restrepo & Thompson (2012) did a study

teaching bilingual children nonsense words. The children with language impairment were slower to learn the new words, and

  • bservations of modifiability (based on work by Liz, and by

Peña) differentiated the two groups. These results are consistent with previous results by myself and others that children with LI can learn, but may need more repetition, and that observations of how well children are paying attention, using new strategies, aware

  • f what they’re doing, self-correcting, self-monitoring are good

indicators of language impairment or typical development.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

MORE ON DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES

  • Patterson, Rodriguez, & Dale (2012) demonstrated that learning trajectories

are different for bilingual children with and without language impairment in a graduated prompting approach. They did both semantic, word learning, and phonological awareness tasks in the stronger language of the child. Children improved on semantic and word learning tasks from the first to final items

  • presented. These results show promise for using a very brief dynamic

assessment approach to screen children for potential language impairment.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Dynamic assessment is conceptually related to the MTSS process, yet it is in abbreviated form… (Grigorenko, 2009)

  • Using a test–teach–test format, dynamic assessment provides information on a

student's present performance as well as the student's ability to learn something new. Dynamic assessment can take place over a relatively brief period, and the extent to which a child learns during the brief dynamic process maps onto his or her ability to progress academically throughout the school year (Petersen, Allen, & Spencer, 2014).

  • The student's ability to learn, often referred to as modifiability, can be an indicator of the

level of intensity of intervention likely needed for academic success. This information

  • n modifiability, in conjunction with static, pretest, or posttest information, can

provide important information on current performance and future instructional needs. This information is both sensitive to any current needs a student might have (e.g., improving English language proficiency) and the likelihood of that student progressing adequately when given Tier 1 general education instruction. Through dynamic assessment, students with language intervention needs can potentially be identified earlier and accurately placed in the appropriate tier of service as soon as possible.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Resources Dynamic Assessment

  • Kapantzoglou, M., Restrepo, M. A., & Thompson, M. S. (2012). Dynamic

assessment of word learning skills: Identifying language impairment in bilingual children. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 81-96.

  • https://www.leadersproject.org/2013/05/15/dynamic-assessment-of-word-

learning-skills-identifying-language-impairment-in-bilingual-children/ https://www.leadersproject.org/2013/05/15/dynamic-assessment-of-word- learning-skills-identifying-language-impairment-in-bilingual-children/

slide-28
SLIDE 28

BESA Update www.brookespublishing.com

  • http://www.brookespublishing.com/
slide-29
SLIDE 29

“The Last Round-Up”

  • We will miss you so keep in touch… you know where we live… and keep

herding the cats!

  • We may be sending some follow-up information to find out how you are doing

and what’s happening!

  • Thank you for your gracious participation and ongoing enthusiasm and energy

to make it better for each and every one of our children and families in Colorado!

  • Thank you for managing the complexities of the Child Find process for children

and families! Adios amigos!

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The Last Round-Up

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Quick Exit Survey

  • Please complete your feedback/evaluation form for today. We are focused on

sustainability so let us know how we can help.

  • We appreciate your informing this process for future teams and documenting

your ongoing success to continued professional development opportunities through CDE!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

HUMAN RESOURCES

Clara Pérez-Méndez clara8352perez@gmail.com Puentes Culturales Susan M. Moore susan.moore@colorado.edu University of Colorado at Boulder Thank you for joining us!