Clinical Discussion Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi Professor and Surgeon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

clinical discussion
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Clinical Discussion Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi Professor and Surgeon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Clinical Discussion Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi Professor and Surgeon Tata Memorial Hospital chaturvedi.pankaj@gmail.com 47/M/smoker Hopkins : Trans- glottic lesion No cartilage infiltration but sclerosis Left vocal cord fixed No


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Clinical Discussion

Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi

Professor and Surgeon Tata Memorial Hospital chaturvedi.pankaj@gmail.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 47/M/smoker
  • Hopkins : Trans-

glottic lesion

  • No cartilage

infiltration but sclerosis

  • Left vocal cord fixed
  • No nodes palpable

Glottic Ca - T3 N0 MO

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Q1 - VOTING Options

1. Surgery -

A. Open partial Laryngectomy B. Laser cordectomy

2. Concurrent Cisplatin + RT 3. Neo adjuvant Chemotherapy 4. Cetuximab + RT 5. Radiotherapy Alone

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Total Laryngectomy TEP PORT

T3 N0 MO Glottic Carcinoma

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Author Year T3 5yr LC T4 5yr LC Mendenhall et al 1996 68% 56% Daugaard et al 1998 38% 29% Santos et al 1998 12% (OS) 14%(OS) Sykes et al 2000 67% 73% Hinerman et al 2002 62% 62%

Radiotherapy for Stage 3 / 4 larynx cancers

Is there a role of RT alone ? YES or NO

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Does NACT still have a role? Yes / No

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Is there a role of Cetuximab +RT

Bonner et al. N Eng J Med 2006;354:567-578

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Surgeon

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Review of 158,426 cases of larynx cancer between 1985-

2001

  • Trend toward decreasing survival from the mid-1980s to

mid-1990s

  • Patterns of initial management across this same period:

↑CTRT and ↓Surgery

  • Survival outcome of T3N0M0 laryngeal cancer in 1994-96

period: Poor 5Yr OS with CTRT (59.2%) and RT alone (42.7%) compared to Sx+RT (65.2%) or Sx alone (63.3%)

  • The decreased survival recorded for patients with

laryngeal cancer in the mid-1990s may be related to changes in patterns of management.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Despite improvement identified overall for all cancer types, survival among patients with laryngeal cancer has diminished. Data from SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/ 1975_2000 Published by Hoffman et al

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • 47/M/Chronic smoker
  • Hoarseness
  • Hopkins : Pyriform
  • Cartilage not involved
  • Left vocal cord fixed
  • No nodes palpable
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Q2 - Voting Options

1.Surgery Followed by CT/RT 2.Concurrent Chemo Radiotherapy 3.Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy 4.Targeted Therapy with RT 5.Radiotherapy alone

slide-13
SLIDE 13

45 yrs young man – Stage 4 a

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Q3 - Voting Options

1.Surgery Followed by CT/RT 2.Concurrent Chemo Radiotherapy 3.Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Primary Chemotherapy in Resectable OSCC : A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:327-

  • 333. L Licitra et al
  • Resectable, stage T2-T4(>3 cm), N0-N2 SCC of
  • ral cavity
  • PF followed by surgery vs surgery with or

without radiotherapy

  • No difference in overall survival

Role of Induction chemotherapy in resectable

  • ral cancers?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Randomized Phase III Trial of ICT with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and FU Followed by Surgery Versus Up-Front Surgery in Locally Advanced Resectable OSCC J Clin

  • Oncol. 2012 Nov 5; L Zhong et al
  • Resectable stage III or IVA OSCC
  • The control and experimental arms did not differ

significantly in locoregional recurrence rates.

  • Estimated 2-year OS and DFS was same

Role of Induction chemotherapy in resectable

  • ral cancers
slide-17
SLIDE 17

NACT – Does it help?

Patil V M, Noronha V, Muddu V K, Gulia S, Bhosale B, Arya S, Juvekar S, Chatturvedi P, Chaukar D A, Pai P, D'cruz A, Prabhash K. Induction chemotherapy in technically unresectable locally advanced oral cavity cancers: Does it make a difference?. Indian J Cancer 2013;50:1-8 Induction chemotherapy was effective in converting technically unresectable oral cavity cancers to operable disease in approximately 40% of patients and was associated with significantly improved overall survival in comparison to nonsurgical treatment.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Stage 4B

  • 52 year Truck Driver
  • Lesion involving right Buccal Mcosa

and extensive infiltration

  • No distant metastases
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Q3 - Voting Options

  • 1. Neo adjuvant Chemotherapy
  • 2. Palliative Chemotherapy
  • 3. Palliative Radiotherapy
  • 4. Best Supportive Care
slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 56 yrs male,

underwent Surgery for Stage 4 Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa with PORT with Chemotherapy

  • At first follow up at 4

months diagnosed with recurrence

  • PET Scan – local

recurrence alone

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Q 4 - VOTING Options 1.Symptomatic Treatment 2.Palliative Chemotherapy 3.Targeted Therapy 4.Surgery if Resectable

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Recurrent/ Metastatic HNSCC
  • Cetuximab + Platin + Flurouracil Vs Platin + Flurouracil
  • About 20% oral cavity patients
  • Better outcome in cetuximab arm

– 2.7 mo median OS improvement ( 10.1 mo Vs 7.4 mo) – 2.3 mo median PFS improvement (5.6 mo Vs 3.3 mo)

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Palliative chemotherapy is the standard
  • ption for most patients with recurrent
  • r metastatic HNSCC

–First line option should be combination of cetuximab with platin and flurouracil

Cetuximab has a definitive role as a firstl ine therapy along with platin and flurouracil for recurrent and metastatic oral cancer

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Result

– QALY increased: 0.093 – Cost increased: $36,000 per person – Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $386,000 per QALY gained.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Metronomic Therapy

  • Pai P S et al. Oral metronomic scheduling of anticancer therapy-based

treatment compared to existing standard of care in locally advanced oral squamous cell cancers: A matched-pair analysis. Indian J Cancer 2013;50:135-41

  • Patil V, Noronha V, D'cruz A K, Banavali S D, Prabhash K. Metronomic

chemotherapy in advanced oral cancers. J Can Res Ther 2012;8:106-10

Comparison of DFS between the oral metronomic scheduling of anticancer therapy and control groups

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • 3x3cm ulcer Rt. lateral border of tongue
  • Not crossing midline / FOM - normal.
  • T2N1M0
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Q5 - Voting Options

  • Wide Excision alone
  • Wide Excision with Neck Dissection
  • Neo adjuvant CT
  • Radiotherapy alone
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Management issues

  • Imaging
  • Surgery or Radiotherapy
  • Margins
  • Neck node management
  • Sentinel Node Biopsy?
  • Reconstruction
  • Should we do HPV testing?
slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • 61/M
  • Tobacco chewer
  • Presented with Right

sided neck mass 2.5 months.

  • O/E- Right neck, Level II

palpable node 5x4 cm.(N2a)

  • PET CT – Nodal Mets
  • nly

Carcinoma of Unknown Origin

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Q 6 - VOTING Options

  • 1. Surgery followed by CT RT
  • 2. Concurrent CT and RT

Other issues –

  • 1. HPV
  • 2. Bilateral Mucosal Radiation
  • 3. Tonsillectomy
slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • 38/F
  • Left Parotid lesion operated

1 month back

  • Details of surgery not

available.

  • Facial nerve intact
  • HPR – Mucoepidermoid

carcinoma (intermediate grade) - 3 cm

  • Margin status unknown
slide-32
SLIDE 32

MRI

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Question

– Repeat Surgery –Adjuvant RT

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • 45/F
  • Presented with Left Thyroid

swelling since 4 years

  • FNAC – Bethesda 2
  • USG – Benign lesion left
  • lobe. Right lobe normal
  • Left Hemi thyroidectomy

done

  • HPR – Well Diff Pap Ca, 3 cm

no ETS, uni-focal

What next?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Question

  • Observation alone
  • Observation + Thyroid suppression
  • Molecular Markers for decision making
  • Completion thyroidectomy alone
  • Completion thyroidectomy with

bilateral CCND

  • Lobar ablation with RAI
slide-36
SLIDE 36