SLIDE 1 David Arkell, Partner Trip DeMuth, Partner Ben Petre, Associate
Colorado Legal Update
SLIDE 2
House Bill 14-1387
SLIDE 3
HB 14-1387
►General update of capital-related statutes for state agencies and
state higher education.
►Deals with, among other items, capital construction, controlled
maintenance, project oversight and review, and lease and purchase of real estate by state agencies and state higher education.
►“Current practice shows that thresholds governing the
procurement of various services associated with capital projects are too low and need to be modified.”
SLIDE 4
HB 14-1387
►Amends threshold amounts used to determine when general
contractors must provide payment and performance bonds on state and local construction projects.
SLIDE 5
HB 14-1387
►Background: General contractors on state and local public
construction projects must provide payment and performance bonds, under the Colorado Public Works Act (C.R.S. §38-26- 105 and -106) and the State Procurement Code (C.R.S. §24- 105-202).
SLIDE 6
HB 14-1387
►Background: Colorado Public Works Act allows unpaid
subcontractors to file a verified statement of claim (similar to a “stop notice” in other states), and requires the state or local agency to publish notice of final settlement (C.R.S. §38-26-107)
SLIDE 7
HB 14-1387
►HB 1387 increases the threshold for contracts on which the
state must require payment and performance bonds from $100,000 to $150,000.
►HB 1387 does not change the threshold for requiring payment
and performance bonds by political subdivisions of the state (e.g., counties, special districts, and municipalities) (threshold remains at $50,000).
SLIDE 8 HB 14-1387
►HB 1387 increases the threshold for requiring publication of
notice of final settlement by the state or by political subdivisions
- f the state from $50,000 to $150,000.
►HB 1387 does not affect the ability of an unpaid subcontractor to
file a verified statement of claim on a contract of any size for the state or political subdivisions of the state.
SLIDE 9
HB 14-1387
►HB 1387 does not affect the Miller Act threshold for requiring
payment and performance bonds on Federal contracts (remains at $100,000).
SLIDE 10
Ben Petre
Developments in Colorado’s Construction Defect Law
SLIDE 11 Recent Developments in Colorado
►Legislative Update
– Three bills aimed at changing the unfavorable climate within Colorado’s condo construction industry
- Condos represent only 2 percent of the new housing market in metro Denver,
versus 20% in other areas
– SB 216 – Sought to provide state financial assistance to help builders meet the cost of insurance premiums for condos costing less than $500K
- Builders report that insurance premiums for condos triple that of apartment units
– SB 219 – Sought to create a multi-agency study on the condo issue – SB 220 – Sought to push more multi-family construction defect cases into arbitration; require full disclosure to homeowners; and require super majority
- f homeowners to approve a construction defect lawsuit
►Lakewood Ordinance
11