Comments for: Two Cheers for Akrasia by Kevin Dorst Konstan3n Genin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comments for two cheers for akrasia by kevin dorst
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Comments for: Two Cheers for Akrasia by Kevin Dorst Konstan3n Genin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comments for: Two Cheers for Akrasia by Kevin Dorst Konstan3n Genin Carnegie Mellon University 2018 Eastern APA Savannah, Georgia Probabilis3c Frames W is a set of possible worlds . P is a func3on mapping world w to P w, the uniquely


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Comments for: Two Cheers for Akrasia by Kevin Dorst

Konstan3n Genin Carnegie Mellon University 2018 Eastern APA Savannah, Georgia

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Probabilis3c Frames

  • W is a set of possible worlds.
  • P is a func3on mapping world w to

Pw, the uniquely ra1onal credence func3on at w.

(Samet, 1997)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Probabilis3c Frames

We want to talk about what credences you ought to have: In English: `one (you) ought now to be t- confident of p.’

[P(p) = t] := {w : Pw(p) = t}

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Probabilis3c Frames

For this setup to make sense it must be that the total evidence is a func3on of the world. Let Ew be the set of worlds compa3ble with the total evidence in w.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Worlds = infinite sequences of coin flips. Eviden1al states = cones of possible extensions of finite sequences:

Standard Sta3s3cal Setup: Sequen3al Binary Experiment

  • bserved so far
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Higher-order Uncertainty

Kevin argues that the following situa3on is ra3onally permissible:

  • and
  • Pw 6= Pw0

Pw(w0) > 0.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Eviden3al Internalism

  • Internalism: If E is your total evidence, then it

entails that it is your total evidence:

  • Externalism: Some3mes your total evidence

does not entail that it is your total evidence. Gallow (2017)

Ew ⊆ {w0 : Ew = Ew0}.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Internalist Argues against HoU

  • 1. If then
  • 2. If then (Internalism).

Ccl.

Pw 6= Pw0 Ew 6= Ew0. Ew 6= Ew0

{w0} ∩ Ew = ∅ Pw(w0) = 0.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dorst denies Eviden3al Internalism

Kevin argues for higher-order uncertainty by producing examples in which eviden3al internalism seems to fail.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

¬p

Bianca the Biologist

p

If the sample is poisonous, Bianca will eventually verify that it is. If the sample is safe, she will never be able to verify that it is safe.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Internalist Response

If total evidence is a feature of the world, then so is what evidence you have managed to figure out by now.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Bianca the Biologist

p, r p, r p, r

Whether or not Bianca has realized that the sample is poisonous is now a feature

  • f the world.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bianca the Biologist

p, r p, r p, r

Total evidence now sa3sfies eviden3al internalism.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Suppose there are at 0-2 possible comple3ons of the word fragment. 1

2

Word Comple3on

slide-15
SLIDE 15

(1,0) (2,0) (0,0)

How many comple3ons I’ve thought of is part of the world.

(1,1) (2,1) (2,2)

Word Comple3on

Number of Comple3ons Number I’ve thought of

slide-16
SLIDE 16

(1,0) (2,0) (0,0)

Eviden3al internalism is sa3sfied.

(1,1) (2,1) (2,2)

Word Comple3on

Number of Comple3ons Number I’ve thought of

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Peer disagreement

The situa3on Kevin describes could be modeled in two different ways.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Peer disagreement

P1 = P2 = P3 Pi(j) = 1/3 me1=P1=you1 me2=P2≠you2 me3≠P3=you3 me1 = me2 = me3 you1 = you2 = you3 me1=P1=you1 me2=P2≠you2 me3≠P3=you3

In the first situa3on Open and Uncertain are sa3sfied but there is no higher-order uncertainty.