Conducting Social Policy Research in the Private Sector A Day in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

conducting social policy research in the private sector
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Conducting Social Policy Research in the Private Sector A Day in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conducting Social Policy Research in the Private Sector A Day in the Life of a Member of the Abt Associates Team November 1, 2019 Michael Frye, Ph.D. Agenda Introductions Overview of Abt Associates Description of my day-to-day work at


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Conducting Social Policy Research in the Private Sector

November 1, 2019 Michael Frye, Ph.D.

A Day in the Life of a Member

  • f the Abt Associates Team
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda § Introductions § Overview of Abt Associates § Description of my day-to-day work at Abt, specifically on the What Works Clearinghouse § Open discussion about opportunities to work at Abt

slide-3
SLIDE 3

How did I get here? § BS in statistics from Virginia Tech in 2006 § Discovered social policy research in the private sector after graduation § Worked for RMC Research Corporation from 2006-2012 § Started working at Abt Associates in 2012 § Completed MS (2008) and Ph.D. (2015) programs while working

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Who We Are

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Core Capabilities

5

§ Communications & Behavior Change § Data Capture & Surveys § Digital Transformations § Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation § Technical Assistance & Implementation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Key Markets & Global Expertise

6

§ Education § Environment & Energy § Food Security & Agriculture § Governance & Justice § Health

§ Behavioral Health § Chronic/Non-Communicable Diseases § Health Systems § Infectious Diseases § Private Sector Health § Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health

§ Housing, Communities, & Asset Building § Workforce & Economic Mobility

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Our clients

7

§ U.S. federal, state, and local governments

§ Health and Human Services (HHS) § Department of Labor (DOL) § Department of Education (Ed) § Food and Nutrition Service, USDA § Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) § Centers for Disease Control (CDC) § United States Agency for International Development (USAID)

§ International governments

§ Department for International Development (DFID) § Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)

§ Universities and foundations

§ Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation § CDC Foundation § Medtronic

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SEP projects

8

§ Abt’s Social and Economic Policy (SEP) division conducts social policy research in the following market areas:

§ Education § Housing, Communities, & Asset Building § Workforce & Economic Mobility

§ SEP research projects tend to be contracts with federal agencies like Institute of Education Sciences, the Department of Education’s research office. § We compete with other similar organizations for these projects. § Sometimes, we will partner with other organizations, universities, or individuals to form the strongest team for a complex research project. § Project scope and duration can vary.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SEP’s education practice

9

§ Abt currently has 50 different education projects with 19 different clients. § Topics include:

§ Child welfare and youth development § Teacher preparation § Literacy § College transitions and success § English language learners § Adult education § Early childhood § STEM education and training § Expanded learning time § Private school vouchers § Charter schools

§ Methods include: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evidence reviews, evaluation technical assistance, quasi-experimental designs (QEDs), descriptive studies.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Education projects

10

§ What Works Clearinghouse Postsecondary Education and Postsecondary Preparation Evidence Reporting (WWC-PEPPER) contract. § DC Opportunity Scholarships Program: a QED study that examines a voucher program that allows students in DC to attend private schools. § College Access: RCTs that test enhancements to two programs: (1) the use of text messaging within Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) and (2) a combination of student materials, advisor development, and messaging (Find the Fit) within the Upward Bound program.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What do I do at Abt?

§ Project Director on the WWC-PEPPER contract, and also advisor on another WWC project to develop Practice Guides § Lead an evidence review for a project to examine how districts nationwide spend Title IV-A money § Manage the Federal Student Aid Experimental Sites Initiatives: a series of experiments that test variations in the disbursement of student aid and the delivery of financial aid services to students § Support an implementation study that examines variation in instructional quality and education experience of students receiving DC-OSP vouchers § Supervise multiple staff an run an initiative to mentor junior staff

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What Is the WWC?

§ The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) reviews the existing research on different programs, products, practices, and policies in education. § Its goal is to provide educators with the information they need to make evidence-based decisions using the results from high-quality research. § It disseminates information through products such as Intervention Reports and Practice Guides.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

WWC Contractors

WWC PGs

IRG (with MPR) 2M (with Abt)

WWC Grants

Development Services Group

WWC PK-12

Mathematica Policy Research (with Abt)

Department of Education (ED) WWC Postsecondary

Abt Associates

Institute of Education Sciences (IES) National Center for Education Evaluation & Regional Assistance National Center for Education Statistics National Center for Education Research National Center for Special Education Research WWC Coordination

American Institutes for Research 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What Is WWC-PEPPER?

§ Covers WWC reviews of research on programs, products, practices, and policies designed to support success at the postsecondary level. § Began in 2012. Abt’s WWC-PEPPER contract began in October 2016 and ends October 2021. § Continues the WWC’s reputation as a “central and trusted” resource for evidence by delivering actionable information to education practitioners, namely in the form

  • f WWC Intervention Reports and Practice Guides.

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

How does the WWC work?

§ The WWC has developed a set of Evidence Standards that can be applied to group design studies to determine if the findings are credible. § Guided by these standards, the WWC conducts systematic reviews in the following steps:

1. Relevant studies are identified via a literature search. 2. Studies are screened to confirm eligibility. 3. Eligible studies are reviewed by WWC certified staff 4. Findings from studies that meet standards are synthesized and published in WWC products, which are posted on the website.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The WWC website

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

WWC products

§ Intervention Reports that summarize research findings on the effectiveness of a particular curriculum, program, practice, or policy. § Practice Guides that provide education practitioners with a set of recommendations to improve practice in their classrooms and schools around a broad education topic (e.g. using technology, teaching students to write)

§ These recommendations capture the intersection of subject matter expertise and supporting evidence from studies that meet the WWC standards.

§ Information on individual studies that were reviewed either for the above mentioned products or other purposes (e.g. grant competitions). § Data on all of the studies reviewed by the WWC. § Handbooks and protocols that define the standards and procedures that guide

  • ur reviews.

§ Webinars that inform the public of the WWC practices and products that are available.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

WWC Intervention Reports

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

WWC Practice Guides

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

WWC Review Process

§ All reviews are guided by a protocol that specifies:

§ Topic statement § Interventions of interest § Eligible populations § Outcomes included § Technical issues § Literature search strategy

§ Studies are double-coded by WWC certified reviewers and then reconciled. § If a study receives a rating of Does Not Meet WWC Standards from the first reviewer, it will be single coded and reconciled.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

WWC Evidence Standards

§ WWC standards cover four research designs that introduce a strong counterfactual (i.e., establishing what would have happened in the absence of the intervention):

§ Randomized controlled trials (RCTs): Randomly assigning subjects (students, classrooms, schools, districts) to a treatment group or a control group. § Quasi-experimental designs (QEDs): Developing a comparison group in a non-random fashion (usually through matching). § Regression discontinuity design (RDDs): Using a “forcing variable” to assign treatment; impacts are assessed at the cut point. § Single-case designs (SCDs): Studying a single participant (or group of participants) using outcomes that are measured repeatedly across different conditions. The subject effectively serves as its own control.

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Key Concepts

§ Attrition: RCTs must have (a) low overall attrition, (b) low differential attrition, and (c) low attrition at both the cluster and subcluster levels in cluster designs. § Baseline equivalence: QEDs must establish baseline equivalence on the analytic sample for each contrast; baseline measure must be correlated with outcome measure. § Confounding factors: An aspect of the intervention was perfectly aligned (“confounded”) with either the intervention or the comparison

  • group. In these cases, it is not possible to tell whether the intervention
  • r the confounding factor is responsible for the difference in outcomes.

– N=1 problem – A characteristic of the intervention is systematically associated with the outcome (e.g., teachers in treatment group all have more experience than controls) – Bundled interventions – Time confounds (treatment and control groups formed in different years)

§ Valid outcomes: Outcomes must meet standards for face validity, reliability, consistency, lack of overalignment.

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Determinants of a WWC Rating

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Why care about the WWC? § Even if you are not doing WWC reviews, the WWC standards will likely affect your work if you do education research. § IES grants are typically held to the WWC standards. § ESSA regulations are increasingly requiring states and districts to pick education solutions that are evidence- based.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What’s next? § Abt is looking for new colleagues § If you are interested in working at a firm that does social policy research, I encourage you to apply!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What are we looking for? § Desire to impact economic well-being of

  • thers via social programs that we study

§ Strong research skills § Proclivity to working collaboratively while also being individually motivated § Interest in innovative approaches to solving problems

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The Recruitment Process

27

*** If you apply, use requisition number 61640 ***

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Questions?

28

Ask now! Or feel free to follow up…

§ Technical questions about our work can be sent to me: Michael_Frye@abtassoc.com § Recruiting questions can be sent to Samantha Hicks: Samantha_Hicks@abtassoc.com

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Connect With Us

29

For company news, job postings and project updates, connect with us on: § Facebook: facebook.com/abtassociates § Twitter: @AbtAssociates and @AbtCareers § LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/abt-associates § Youtube: youtube.com/abtassociatesinc § Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abtassociates/?hl=en § Abtassociates.com