Defining the firing rate for a non-Poissonian spike train --- a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

defining the firing rate for a non poissonian spike train
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Defining the firing rate for a non-Poissonian spike train --- a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

German-Japanese program in computational neuroscience OIST, March 2-5, 2010 Defining the firing rate for a non-Poissonian spike train --- a nerdish study --- Shigeru Shinomoto Kyoto Univ., Japan A message from a neuron We have established


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Defining the firing rate for a non-Poissonian spike train

Shigeru Shinomoto Kyoto Univ., Japan

  • -- a nerdish study ---

German-Japanese program in computational neuroscience OIST, March 2-5, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

A message from a neuron

We have established several methods for optimizing rate estimators: 1.PSTH --- 2007 2.Kernel smoother --- 2010 3.Bayesian inference --- 2005, 2009

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

PSTH

Spike Sequences PSTH Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram

3

number of spikes / binsize

Time dependence may be depicted. But… Multiple interpretations: Which is a likely message ?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Optimizing time histograms

( ) dt

T

T t t 2

ˆ 1 MISE

− = λ λ

Shimazaki and Shinomoto, Neural Comput. (2007) 19: 1503-1527.

Hideaki Shimazaki

Mean Integrated Squared Error PSTH 1 underlying rate spike data PSTH 2 PSTH 3 rigorous inference

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

RECIPE

Shimazaki and Shinomoto, Neural Comput. (2007) 19: 1503-1527.

Rule is simple:

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Kernel optimization

Hideaki Shimazaki

Shimazaki and Shinomoto, J. Comput Neurosci (2010) 29:171-182.

better

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

RECIPE

Shimazaki and Shinomoto, J. Comput Neurosci (2010) 29:171-182.

Rule is fairly simple:

Most downloaded articles in 90 days (Mar. 3, 2011)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Bayesian inference

Rate Spikes

Inverse probability = Bayes

Shimokawa & Shinomoto, Neural Computation (2009) 21:1931-1951.

Takeaki Shimokawa

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Poissonian assumption

Well done! Our rate estimation algorithms are derived rigorously. However, they are all based on Poissonian assumption. We should test Poissonian. But how can we do it?

poisson

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Capture non-Poissonian

Rescale the time axis! How do we test Poissonian?

Bermann (1982) Ogata (1988) ~ seismology Reich, Victor & Knight (1998) Oram, Wiener, Lestienne & Richmond (1999) Barbieri, Quirk, Frank, Wilson & Brown (2001) Smith & Brown (2003) Koyama & Shinomoto (2005) Shimokawa & Shinomoto (2009) Shimokawa, Koyama & Shinomoto (2010)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Estimate non-Poisson feature

How to

11

(1) Conjecture a time-dependent rate. (2) Rescale the time axis with this rate. (3) Conjecture an inter-spike interval distribution. Non-Poisson: regular (4) Estimate the likelihood. Repeat (1) - (4) to search for the maximum likelihood. >>> Obtain (non-Poisson feature & rate revised). Poisson: random Non-Poisson: bursty

Non

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Bayesian interpretations

Koyama & Shinomoto, J. Phys. A (2005) 38: L531-L537.

marginal likelihood

Shinsuke Koyama

For a single spike train, two interpretations arise. One interpretation is selected according to statistical plausibility.

~ regularly derived from a fluctuating rate ~ irregularly derived from a constant rate Irregular intervals Regular intervals

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Bayesian inference

Shimokawa & Shinomoto, Neural Computation (2009) 21:1931-1951.

Takeaki Shimokawa

rate regularity estimated rate estimated regularity spike train

Estimating the rate and irregularity instantaneously.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Benefit

  • 1. Characterize non-Poissonian feature.
  • 2. Improve the firing rate estimation by

taking account of the non-Poissonian feature.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Lv is doing time-rescaling

Coefficient of Variation, Cv Cv=1.0 Cv=1.0 Cv=1.0 Local Variation, Lv Lv=0.1 Lv=1.0 Lv=1.4 regular random bursty instantaneous rate2 cross correlation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Neuronal firing patterns

Shinomoto, Shima & Tanji, Neural Computation (2003) 15: 2823-2842.

unimodal bimodal

preSMA SMA PF CMAr

Coefficient of Variation Local Variation Neurons are not necessarily the Poisson spike generators.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Relation to function

Kim, Shimokawa, Matsuno, Toyama

non-Poissonian characteristics

Shinomoto, Kim, Shimokawa, Matsuno, Funahashi, Shima, Fujita, Tamura, Doi, Kawano, Inaba, Fukushima, Kurkin, Kurata, Taira, Tsutsui, Komatsu, Ogawa, Koida, Tanji, & Toyama, PLoS Comput Biol (2009) 5:e1000433.

regular random bursty

This is in essence due to the time rescaling operation in Lv, or LvR.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Structure, function & signal

Korbinian Brodmann (1868 - 1918) Monkey cortex

structure function

cytoarchitectonics and cortical functions

signal

firing patterns

1909 vintage ! Shinomoto, Kim, Shimokawa,et al., PLoS Comput Biol (2009) 5:e1000433.

I am a German neurologist. I was born in Liggersdorf, and studied medicine in Munich, Würzburg, Berlin and Freiburg.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Cytoarchitecture

PF MM

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Guess what

Lv map of seismology ~random ~bursty

Zhao, Omi, Matsuno, and Shinomoto, New J Phys 12 (2010) 063010.

Zhao, Omi, Matsuno

Again, this is in essence due to the time rescaling operation in Lv.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Benefit

Another benefit

  • 1. Characterize non-Poissonian feature.
  • 2. Improve the firing rate estimation by

taking account of the non-Poissonian feature.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Rate & irregularity

  • In estimating the affection from love

letters, we take account of the punctuality of the sender.

  • A spike train should be interpreted

in terms of a set of (rate & regularity) ~ (affection & punctuality).

  • No more and no less !

Shimokawa, Koyama & Shinomoto, J. Comput Neurosci (2010) 29:183-191.

Shimokawa, Koyama