Development of Ecosystem component maps Henna Rinne, HELCOM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development of ecosystem component maps
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development of Ecosystem component maps Henna Rinne, HELCOM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Development of Ecosystem component maps Henna Rinne, HELCOM Secretariat henna.rinne@helcom.fi 6.9.2016 40 Ecosystem component layers Pelagic habitats (2) Broad-scale seabed habitats (6) Habitat forming species (5) Natura 2000


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Development of Ecosystem component maps

Henna Rinne, HELCOM Secretariat henna.rinne@helcom.fi 6.9.2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

40 Ecosystem component layers

  • Pelagic habitats (2)
  • Broad-scale seabed habitats (6)
  • Habitat forming species (5)
  • Natura 2000 habitats (9)
  • Commercial fish species (4)
  • Coastal fish (5)
  • Important bird areas (3)
  • Marine mammals (6)

TAPAS workshop 6.9.2016 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pelagic habitats

  • Productive surface waters

– Springtime (weeks 12-22) Chl-a concentration used as a proxy. Areas with high phytoplankton production are given higher importance – Data: satellite data (MERIS) for 2011 (or potentially mean of years 2009-2011). No MERIS data available for years 2012-1016. Data provided by the Finnish Environment Institute. For Danish area probably complemented with MODIS data.

  • Oxygenated deep waters

– Areas not suffering from hypoxia (O2 concentration > 2mg/l). If possible, areas weighed with O2 concentration (higher concentration, higher importance). – Data: requests to SMHI and to IOW made. Final data source, format and timescale still uncertain.

6.9.2016 3 TAPAS workshop

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Broad-scale seabed habitats

  • Together, the broad-scale habitats cover the

whole Baltic Sea.

‒ Infralittoral mud ‒ Infralittoral sand ‒ Infralittoral hard bottom ‒ Circalittoral mud ‒ Circalittoral sand ‒ Circalittoral hard bottom

  • Data: EUSeaMap
  • New release in September

6.9.2016 4 TAPAS workshop

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Habitat forming species

  • Fucus sp.
  • Furcellaria lumbricalis
  • Charophytes
  • Zostera marina
  • Mytilus edulis
  • Data: HELCOM data call on species and biotopes
  • Mainly point data received, limited or lacking data from some countries
  • Predictive model results from Estonia and Finland (also point data from Finland)
  • Generalizations and predictive models considered as a methods for map production:

generalizations chosen due to lack of suitable substrate data

  • Here, generalizations made to 5 km grid cells (then converted to 1 km grid)  data as

presence (1) and absence (0) to the BSII

6.9.2016 5 TAPAS workshop

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Habitat forming species

6.9.2016 6 TAPAS workshop

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Natura 2000 habitats

  • Sandbanks (1110)
  • Estuaries (1130)
  • Mudflats and sandflats (1140)
  • Coastal lagoons (1150)
  • Large shallow inlets and bays (1160)
  • Reefs (1170)
  • Submarine structures made by leaking gas (1180)
  • Baltic esker islands (uw parts) (1610)
  • Boreal Baltic islets and small islands (uw parts) (1620)
  • Data: HELCOM data call on species and biotopes

– Polygon data received, the methods and the coverage of the marine area vary between countries – Converted to 1 km grid cells, Data as presence (1) and absence (0) to the BSII

6.9.2016 7 TAPAS workshop

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Natura 2000 habitats

6.9.2016 8 TAPAS workshop

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Natura 2000 habitats

6.9.2016 9 TAPAS workshop

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Commercial fish species

  • Cod spawning area
  • Cod abundance
  • Maps created in communication with fish experts
  • Data:

– Cod spawning: Based on Hüssy, K. 2011. Review of western Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) recruitment dynamics. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68(7), 1459-1471. – Cod abundance: Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS) data from ICES. – Map values normalized in the BSII

  • Average of CPUE values 2011-2014, per ICES subdivision (quarter 1).
  • Cod ≥ 30cm included.
  • Outside BITS coverage: landings data (from DCF). If the total catch within the ICES statistical rectangle (all 4

years summed) was >0.5 tonnes and the number of years when cod has been caught within the statistical rectangle was >1, the area was considered as cod distribution area. A value corresponding low CPUE values was given to these areas.

  • Currently Kattegat not standardized with the rest of the area.

6.9.2016 10 TAPAS workshop

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cod maps

Hüssy 2011

6.9.2016 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Commercial fish species

  • Herring abundance
  • Sprat abundance
  • Data

– Baltic International Acoustic Survey (BIAS) data, average of 2011-2015. Reported as millions of fish/ICES statistical rectangle. Outside BIAS coverage, landings data used. – For herring, the landings data indicated distribution across the Baltic Sea, thus a constant value of 10 (millions of herring/ICES rectangle) was given to all areas outside BIAS data, corresponding to low abundance. – For sprat BIAS surveys cover almost the whole distribution area. Few areas with significant sprat landings but outside BIAS area  value of 1 (millions of sprat/ICES rectangle) was given corresponding to low abundance. – The map values are normalized in the BSII

6..9.2016 12 TAPAS workshop

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Herring and sprat maps

6.9.2016 13 TAPAS workshop

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Coastal fish

  • Flounder (two ecotypes in the Baltic Sea)
  • Demersal spawning flounder (distribution)
  • Pelagic spawning flounder (abundance)
  • Data

– Demersal spawning: The distribution area delineated by selecting area with depth < 50m within ICES subdivisions 25-32 (Florin & Höglund 2008, Florin et

  • al. 2015, ICES 2014). To exclude areas with < 5 PSU salinity (ICES 2014),

Bothnian Bay and Quark, as well as Russian part of Gulf of Finland were excluded from the map, according to HELCOM sub-basin division. Presence (1) absence (0) data to the BSII. – Pelagic spawning: Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS) data, reported per ICES subdivision, average of 2011-2016, quarter 1. In the subdivisions 25, 26 and 28 also demersal spawners can be included in the CPUE values (Florin et

  • al. 2015). Values normalized in the BSII.

6.9.2016 14 TAPAS workshop

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Flounder maps

6.9.2016 15 TAPAS workshop

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Coastal fish

  • Recruitment areas of perch
  • Recruitment areas of pikeperch
  • Recruitment areas of roach
  • Why recruitment areas?

– No reliable data for adults across the Baltic Sea (gaps in landings data, coastal fish monitoring data scarce in many areas) – Recruitment areas essential for maintaining fish populations – Modelling studies exist for fish recruitment areas  thresholds for environment requirements for fish recruitment

  • Data: Baltic-wide data layers of environmental variables

– Depth (Baltic Sea Bathymetry database) – Exposure (Wave Impact Index Isæus 2004) – Salinity (May means for 2011-2014, Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service) – Secchi depth (MERIS data for May 2011, Tartu Observatory)  Presence (1) absence (0) maps to the BSII

6.9.2016 16 TAPAS workshop

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Perch and pikeperch maps

6.9.2016 17

  • Depth < 4m
  • Exposure (log10) < 4
  • Salinity < 10 PSU

 Generalized to 1km grid

  • Depth < 5m
  • Exposure (log10) < 4
  • Salinity < 7 PSU
  • Secchi depth < 2m

 Generalized to 1km grid

TAPAS workshop

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Important bird areas

  • Wintering seabirds
  • Breeding seabird colonies
  • Migration routes for birds

– Sweden leading the data collation and map production (Related to HELCOM Rec 34/1). – Data call on SPAs and IBAs sent in June, again in August. Deadline 23 September. – Wish for the separation of breeding and wintering areas, if possible. – Migration routes may be difficult.

6.9.2016 18 TAPAS workshop

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Marine mammals

  • Grey seal abundance
  • Grey seal haul-outs
  • Harbour seal abundance
  • Harbour seal haul-outs
  • Ringed seal distribution
  • Distribution / abundance of harbour porpoise
  • Maps created in communication with seal experts
  • Data:

– Seals: Count data collated in BALSAM project, reported per HELCOM sub-basin / country (e.g. Swedish Bothnian Bay). Haul-out sites reported as points (coordinates). – Harbour porpoise: Probability for detection maps from SAMBAH project will be available – delivery schedule still uncertain

6.9.2016 19 TAPAS workshop

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Harbour seal maps

6.9.2016 20

Method:

  • Interpolation between count points (in HELCOM sb)
  • Point set to the centre of each sub-basin
  • Map values normalized in the BSII

Method:

  • Number of haul-outs within 10km x 10km area
  • Map values normalized in the BSII

TAPAS workshop

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Grey seal maps

6.9.2016 21

Method:

  • Aim to collate data on counts / haul-out
  • Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Denmark, (Poland)
  • Map values normalized in the BSII

Method:

  • Number of haul-outs within 10km x 10km area
  • Map values normalized in the BSII

TAPAS workshop

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Ringed seal

  • No count data available
  • Rough distribution map

using HELCOM sub-basins (presence/absence data in the BSII)

6.9.2016 22 TAPAS workshop

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Harbour porpoise

6.9.2016 23

  • Probability of detection ~

abundance

  • Data outside SAMBAH-

area: Danish acoustic surveys, e.g. Teilmann et

  • al. 2008, Sveegaard et al

2011

TAPAS workshop

slide-24
SLIDE 24