SLIDE 9 8/31/2012 9
Placement Decisions and Permanency Hearing
Continuing placement:
EPP Cases: Court can order the Department to show cause as to why it should not file
for termination at the permanency hearing.
Exceptions : when parents are visiting regularly, to the child’s benefit, or
when the termination criteria have not yet been met
Non-EPP Cases: Court first considers whether the child shall be returned to the parent. Must address whether reasonable efforts to find a safe and permanent
place for child have been made.
If the child is not to be returned, the court should address whether there is a
substantial probability that the child will be returned within 6 months.
The court is required to make findings whether to return home if the parent can
provide reasonable parental care. See In re A.W.R., 17 P.3d 192
Children in Court
Purpose:
Children are increasingly being invited to court. In Colorado, C.R.S. §19-3-702 provides children with the right to
participate in their case at the permanency hearing.
Pros for having children appear in court:
Many children want to go home, and providing children the opportunity to
express that to the court can be very persuasive.
This may be important if the GAL and the child’s position are different.
The child have the opportunity to speak directly to the judge.
Cons:
Some believe that it can be harmful to children to have them in court. Some parents do not want children hearing negative information about
them.
Appeals of Permanency Planning Decisions
Final Order:
Permanency hearings alone are not final orders and cannot be
appealed.
Dispositional orders can be appealed Termination orders can be appealed as a matter of right.
Interlocutory Appeals:
No interlocutory appeals or appeals viable at any other points
during the case.
Magistrate/District Court judge :
PP orders made by magistrate may be appealed to district court. Parents can withdraw their consent to a magistrate before the
permanency hearing and ask that it be set before the trial court.