Downtown Parking Study Committee Meeting #5 FeeinLieu July 2, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

downtown parking study committee meeting 5
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Downtown Parking Study Committee Meeting #5 FeeinLieu July 2, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Downtown Parking Study Committee Meeting #5 FeeinLieu July 2, 2019 Hood River City Hall + Existing Conditions 1 Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Approve Meeting #4 Notes Rick Williams 3. FeeinLieu (WP #5) Rick Williams 4. Preview:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Committee Meeting #5

July 2, 2019 Hood River City Hall

1

Downtown Parking Study

Fee‐in‐Lieu + Existing Conditions

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • 1. Introductions
  • 2. Approve Meeting #4 Notes

Rick Williams

  • 3. Fee‐in‐Lieu (WP #5)

Rick Williams

  • 4. Preview: Existing Conditions (WP #6)

Pete Collins

  • 5. Update: Public Outreach

Rick Williams

  • 6. Next Steps
  • July 9, 2019 Open House
  • August 6, 2019 Ad Hoc Committee

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Approve Meeting #4 Notes

3

Refer to Handout

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fee‐in‐Lieu

4

Refer to Handout

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fee‐in‐Lieu

5

Key Purpose

Fees‐in‐lieu allows a new or intensified development to buy out of a requirement to provide a minimum number of parking stalls. Fees paid by the developer are used by the City to fund development of new public parking facilities.

A fee‐in‐lieu rate is generally set at a level less than the cost for a developer to provide on‐site parking. Fees‐in‐lieu are generally calibrated to the level of commitment the City makes to the payer for access to an off‐site parking supply: an “entitlement” to parking access.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fee‐in‐Lieu

6

Benefits

  • Encourages developers to consider

“right sizing” their parking supply.

  • Encourages developers to explore

shared‐use opportunities in reasonable proximity to their development site.

  • Can reduce development costs, making

projects more feasible.

  • Provides a revenue source that the City

can invest in a consolidated parking development plan.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fee‐in‐Lieu

7

Current Program 2019/2020 Fee Schedule

Type of Use Fee‐in‐lieu Residential $22,088 per space (first 2/3rd) + $2,142 per space (last 1/3rd) Commercial $1,226 per space Industrial $1,226 per space

  • Appears to favor commercial/industrial?
  • Would suggest disincentive to residential?
  • Would suggest plan for other funds to

accommodate new supply for commercial/industrial?

Per 17.024.010 B, the City directs funds collected from fee‐in‐ lieu payments to be deposited “in a dedicated fund for the development and provision of public parking facilities.”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fee‐in‐Lieu

8

Case Studies

Bend, OR: $26,000/per stall. The fee goes into a fund designated “only for the planning, acquisition, development, and maintenance of

  • ff‐street parking facilitates located in and/or

adjacent to the CBD.” Corvallis, OR: $10,560/per stall. Funds to be used by the City to construct publicly available parking

  • spaces. “It should be recognized that Fee‐in‐Lieu

Parking Program fees may construct spaces that do not directly serve the parcels from which the fee was collected.” Tualatin, OR: $3,500 per stall required. Tualatin’s fee‐in‐lieu program (Chapter 3.3) only applies to the Central Business District.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fee‐in‐Lieu

9

Hood River: Issues to Consider

  • Clarity on the strategic intent for use
  • f the fees collected. City role and

responsibility.

  • Are there expectations of an access

entitlement that may or may not be granted to fee payers?

  • A consistent and market‐based

methodology for calculating fees.

  • Planning for use of fees collected with
  • ther funding sources to support new

supply.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Existing Conditions

10

Refer to White Paper #6

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Publicly Owned Supply

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Financial History

12

  • Gross revenue between $600,000 and $700,000 annually between FY 2010/11 and FY 2015/16.
  • Revenue has shown a strong upward trend to FY 2016/17, exceeding $900,000.
  • Revenues dropped slightly to just under $900,000 in FY 2017/2018 (the last fully completed fiscal

year).

  • Expense growth has been constant (within normal growth range).
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Revenue History

13

70% 19% 11% 0% 0% Meters Enforcement Monthly Permits Work Permits Misc

Program Revenue (2010‐2018) Average Annual Percentage Meters $4,019,044 $502,380 70.0% Enforcement $1,066,796 $133,349 18.6% Monthly Permits $611,413 $76,426 10.6% Work Permits $24,154 $3,019 0.4% Misc. $22,744 $2,843 0.4% Total $5,744,152 $718,019

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Expense History

14

67% 15% 9% 5% 4% 0% Salary & Wages Office Operations Infrastructure Contract services Bank Fees Misc

Program Expenditures (2010‐2018) Average Annual Percentage Salary & Wages $1,450,346 $181,293 67.0% Office Operations $317,780 $39,722 14.7% Infrastructure $188,156 $23,519 8.7% Contract Services $105,657 $13,207 4.9% Bank Fees $99,615 $12,451 4.6% Misc. $2,721 $340 0.1% Total $2,164,277 $270,534

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Existing Conditions

15

  • The parking system generates surplus

revenue over expenses.

  • Based on the past eight years, the

downtown parking system has generated net revenues of $3,579,875; about $447,484 each year.

  • The system is netting approximately $478

per stall per year, or $39.84 per stall per month.

  • How all or a portion of future net

revenues are allocated back into the City’s financial program should be discussed.

Key Findings ‐ Financial

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Existing Conditions

16

  • Payment Technology ‐ 72% of pay‐to‐park stalls

are coin only. This puts users at risk of receiving a citation or shortening their visit (and spending

  • pportunity) in the downtown.
  • Wayfinding. It is difficult to determine where off‐

street parking options are available.

  • Lot identification. Individual City‐owned lots are

not visually identified with a common brand and/or lot identifier.

  • Pricing. It does not appear at this time that on‐ or
  • ff‐street pricing is tied to parking demand.
  • Financial reporting. Revenue/expenditure

reporting for enforcement wages and salary (expense) and citations issued (revenue) should be called out as separate line items.

General Observations

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Existing Conditions

17

  • Strategy Development – Couple 2018 data with

Guiding Principles and observations of existing conditions to propose management strategies.

 Policy/Code Development. Propose revisions to policy and code to ensure efficient parking system and supportive development environment.  Financial System. Propose revisions to financial reporting to support future decision‐making.  Pricing. Propose policy and procedure for setting and managing rates (on‐street, off‐ street, permits).  New technologies/communications systems. Propose best practice systems to support all strategies.

What’s Next?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Next Steps

18

  • Meeting #6: August 1, 2019
  • Existing Conditions Detail
  • New Technologies (WP #7)
  • Public Outreach Update
  • What more would the

Committee like to see?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

THANK YOU!