Emissions Inventory MATES III Technical Advisory Group March 13, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

emissions inventory mates iii technical advisory group
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Emissions Inventory MATES III Technical Advisory Group March 13, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Emissions Inventory MATES III Technical Advisory Group March 13, 2008 Outline Methods Results for carcinogens Species apportionment Source apportionment Emissions and air quality changes since MATES-II Methods 2007


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MATES III Technical Advisory Group March 13, 2008 Emissions Inventory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Methods
  • Results for carcinogens

Species apportionment Source apportionment Emissions and air quality changes since MATES-II

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Methods

  • 2007 AQMP inventory forms the basis of

the MATES-III toxic inventory.

  • 2002 baseline emissions projected to 2005.
  • “Top-down” approach used for developing

toxic emissions.

– i.e., chemical composition of TOG and PM emissions determined by ARB’s speciation profiles. – http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/speciate/speciate.htm.

  • Emissions spatially allocated to 2 km by 2

km grid cells.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why “Top-down Approach?

  • Speciating TOG and PM inventories affords

consistency with 2007 AQMP.

– Fits in with AQMD’s goal of a comprehensive plan

  • Photochemical modeling requires complete

speciation of TOG; an inventory of just toxics would be insufficient.

  • AQMP tools for projecting future emissions &

air quality benefits can also be used for MATES-III to estimate cancer risk benefits from the AQMP.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pollutants Inventoried

* denotes carcinogen Nickel* 1,4 Dioxane* Naphthalene* Diesel particulate* Vinyl chloride* MTBE* 1,1 Dichloroethane* Trichloroethylene* Methylene chloride* Chromium Toluene Methyl ethyl ketone Chloroform* Styrene Lead* Carbon tetrachloride* Silicon Hexavalent chromium* Cadmium* Selenium Formaldehyde* 1,3 Butadiene* Propylene oxide* Ethylene oxide* Benzene* Perchloroethylene* Ethylene dichloride* Arsenic* p-Dichlorobenzene* Ethylene dibromide* Acetone Organic carbon Elemental carbon Acetaldehyde*

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Emission Inventory Results

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Preliminaries

  • Slides that follow only consider carcinogens.
  • Emissions are in diesel PM currency.

– i.e., emissions weighted by the ratio of the carcinogen’s cancer potency to the cancer potency of diesel PM.

  • 1998 = MATES-II; 2005 = MATES-III
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Species Apportionment of Cancer Potency Weighted Emissions

99.6 Total 0.24 Naphthalene 0.97 Formaldehyde 0.26 Hexavalent chromium 2.92 Perchloroethylene 0.29 Cadmium 2.95 Benzene 0.30 p-dichlorobenzene 4.02 1,3-Butadiene 0.66 Arsenic 86.94 Diesel particulate Contribution (%) Toxic Contribution (%) Toxic

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Carcinogenic Source Apportionment

On-road 36% Off-road 57% Point 2% Area 5% On-road Off-road Point Area

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Carcinogenic Emissions

(MATES-II vs. MATES-III)

20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 MATES-II (1998) MATES-III (2005)

Emissions as DPM (lbs/day) On-road Off-road Point Area

43% decrease Area 65% decrease Point 1% increase Off-road 13% decrease On-road Percent Change Source Category

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Emission and Air Quality Changes Since MATES-II

  • 81%
  • 65%

Trichloroethylene

  • 34%
  • 22%

Nickel

  • 78%
  • 58%

Perchloroethylene

  • 53%
  • 14%

Lead

  • 53%
  • 38%

Methylene Chloride

  • 5%
  • 85%
  • Hex. Chromium
  • 9%
  • 21%

Formaldehyde

  • 28%
  • 2%

Elemental Carbon

  • 73%
  • 31%

1,3 Butadiene

  • 75%
  • 19%

Cadmium

  • 50%
  • 36%

Benzene

  • 59%
  • 20%

Arsenic

  • 9%
  • 9%

Acetaldehyde AQ E Particulates AQ E Gases