Emissions Inventory MATES III Technical Advisory Group March 13, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Emissions Inventory MATES III Technical Advisory Group March 13, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Emissions Inventory MATES III Technical Advisory Group March 13, 2008 Outline Methods Results for carcinogens Species apportionment Source apportionment Emissions and air quality changes since MATES-II Methods 2007
Outline
- Methods
- Results for carcinogens
Species apportionment Source apportionment Emissions and air quality changes since MATES-II
Methods
- 2007 AQMP inventory forms the basis of
the MATES-III toxic inventory.
- 2002 baseline emissions projected to 2005.
- “Top-down” approach used for developing
toxic emissions.
– i.e., chemical composition of TOG and PM emissions determined by ARB’s speciation profiles. – http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/speciate/speciate.htm.
- Emissions spatially allocated to 2 km by 2
km grid cells.
Why “Top-down Approach?
- Speciating TOG and PM inventories affords
consistency with 2007 AQMP.
– Fits in with AQMD’s goal of a comprehensive plan
- Photochemical modeling requires complete
speciation of TOG; an inventory of just toxics would be insufficient.
- AQMP tools for projecting future emissions &
air quality benefits can also be used for MATES-III to estimate cancer risk benefits from the AQMP.
Pollutants Inventoried
* denotes carcinogen Nickel* 1,4 Dioxane* Naphthalene* Diesel particulate* Vinyl chloride* MTBE* 1,1 Dichloroethane* Trichloroethylene* Methylene chloride* Chromium Toluene Methyl ethyl ketone Chloroform* Styrene Lead* Carbon tetrachloride* Silicon Hexavalent chromium* Cadmium* Selenium Formaldehyde* 1,3 Butadiene* Propylene oxide* Ethylene oxide* Benzene* Perchloroethylene* Ethylene dichloride* Arsenic* p-Dichlorobenzene* Ethylene dibromide* Acetone Organic carbon Elemental carbon Acetaldehyde*
Emission Inventory Results
Preliminaries
- Slides that follow only consider carcinogens.
- Emissions are in diesel PM currency.
– i.e., emissions weighted by the ratio of the carcinogen’s cancer potency to the cancer potency of diesel PM.
- 1998 = MATES-II; 2005 = MATES-III
Species Apportionment of Cancer Potency Weighted Emissions
99.6 Total 0.24 Naphthalene 0.97 Formaldehyde 0.26 Hexavalent chromium 2.92 Perchloroethylene 0.29 Cadmium 2.95 Benzene 0.30 p-dichlorobenzene 4.02 1,3-Butadiene 0.66 Arsenic 86.94 Diesel particulate Contribution (%) Toxic Contribution (%) Toxic
Carcinogenic Source Apportionment
On-road 36% Off-road 57% Point 2% Area 5% On-road Off-road Point Area
Carcinogenic Emissions
(MATES-II vs. MATES-III)
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 MATES-II (1998) MATES-III (2005)
Emissions as DPM (lbs/day) On-road Off-road Point Area
43% decrease Area 65% decrease Point 1% increase Off-road 13% decrease On-road Percent Change Source Category
Emission and Air Quality Changes Since MATES-II
- 81%
- 65%
Trichloroethylene
- 34%
- 22%
Nickel
- 78%
- 58%
Perchloroethylene
- 53%
- 14%
Lead
- 53%
- 38%
Methylene Chloride
- 5%
- 85%
- Hex. Chromium
- 9%
- 21%
Formaldehyde
- 28%
- 2%
Elemental Carbon
- 73%
- 31%
1,3 Butadiene
- 75%
- 19%
Cadmium
- 50%
- 36%
Benzene
- 59%
- 20%
Arsenic
- 9%
- 9%
Acetaldehyde AQ E Particulates AQ E Gases