Employee Relations: Are we just doing
- rbits, or have we really titled the
Employee Relations: Are we just doing orbits, or have we really - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Employee Relations: Are we just doing orbits, or have we really titled the trajectory? #reflections post being CCMA Director Going to cover Orbit one: Reminding us of historical context Orbit two: new institutions, what we expected and
Orbit one: Reminding us of historical context Orbit two: new institutions, what we expected and what we actually got Orbit three: Stakeholders role in labour law Orbit four: Inter and intra union rivalry Orbit five: Business as a constituency Orbit six: Broader labour market,20 years on How do we look at the trajectories for the future?
1910 after declaration of South African union 1924 Industrial Conciliation Act provided for registration of Trade Unions(TU) & Employer
:But excluding most black workers from Industrial Relations and qualifications 1948 Nationalists emerged divisions and encouraged parallel bargaining structures for black workers. TU that emerged then faced a period of intense repression 1973 strike wave by African TU: Appointment of Wiehahn Commission Recommendations: Black workers freedom of association, voluntary Collective Bargaining. Formation of Industrial court, which fashioned our modern dispensation
Set out procedural and substantive fairness Creating ULP to advantage of all workers, even though meant to favour white workers Curbed managerial prerogative for first time Extended in early 1990 to public servants
Implementing was a priority, task team quickly formed, BEFORE real analysis done. Hence amendments were made piecemeal Draft bill developed with key intent to restructure the collective and individual rights in labour law. First LRA, then BCEA Encompass all South African workers Comply with constitutional and international obligation: ILO All negotiated before labour Market commission submitted its report Premised on the EUPHORIA THAT SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND COMMON VALUES WIN THE DAY
Old dispensation
Conciliation boards: 1. Not achieve resolution, formulaic 2. Time consuming 3. No real dialogue and engagement Industrial Courts 1. Takes too long( all courts) 2. Too Legalistic 3. Officers not representative 4. Legal representation complicated process 5. Strike issues on CB
New dispensation
Emphasis on dialogue 1. Compulsory conciliation 2. No legal representation 3. Concise time frames 4. Preserving relationships 5. Access for everyone, especially vulnerable(Bargaining Councils for industry to be formed) 6. Basic hearings on Audi principal Arbitration 1. Minimal formalities ,reduce legal rep ,speed Labour court 1. Reduce appeals to reviews. Limit complexity and time
Regulated flexibility
Idea was needed employment flexibility ,(freedom to change employment levels quickly and cheaply) wage flexibility (freedom to determine without restraint) functional flexibility ( freedom alter work process ,terms and conditions quickly and cheaply) labour market security employment security job security work security representation security
IDEA WAS ADJUSTMENT PER SECTOR, SECTORAL AND WORKPLACE FLEXIBILITY GOVERNED BY FAIRINESS RATIONAILITY AND WORKPLACE CO OPERATION WITH CODE OF PRACTICE REGUALRLY ISSUED AS GUIDANCE
Update and align collective agreements Review, redesign and simplify disciplinary hearings @ workplaces : Audi rule CCMA port of last call, vulnerable worker access Collaboration on dialogue, workplace forums ,develop trust and agree productivity Implement specialized Labour courts Design /realign/ create more Bargaining councils Collective bargaining, based on trust ,needs and sectors/industries
Needed to review :
In most cases this was not implemented ,and were left with a “hang over” of old agreements.
Commissioners forced to interpret disputes through them, hence creating almost a dual system
EXPECTED: To Used by vulnerable sectors Swift quick efficient Dispute Resolution Minimal legal formalities Limited representation rights Dialogue at the workplace Only “true” cases referred Address discrimination in workplace Representative commissioners Restorative Social justice
Individual rights
Cottage industry of chairs :Often predetermined outcomes No dialogue or joint problem solving Abdication of leadership or decision making : Over reliance on CCMA commissioners Outsource of Employee Relations aspects of management functions Ethics Excessive implementation of workplace Policies and their application
Expected a specialist court with tenured judges and facilities Speedy Understanding of the “social contract” nature of employment laws Unhoped for Victim of unclear policy certainty, still not resolved 2002 concerns on tenure etc. Inability to attract judges schooled in the labour market principles ,or get them to stay Causes very legalistic interpretations on issues Time taken to give judgements and backlogs developed Resource challenges Less efficient management of case management
Good examples here of how original intentions have not been pursued. Fractured Industrial Relations This is due to:
manner
councils
First ten years, relative industrial calm. Minimal violence, strikes focused on wage demands 1. Existing mechanisms used 2. Tentative buy in to the need for higher levels of co operation and mediation 3. Leadership skills used to find resolution Next ten years, seen rise in strike action, violence 1. Socio economic realities 2. Trade union rivalry 3. Bargaining methods remain the same 4. Change in organizer profile 5. Workplace reverted to being a site of struggle 6. Media became an influencer in the bargaining process
Initial swift implementation was that the united beliefs and aspirations of social outcomes were unified. Laws change society NEDLAC was seen as world example, and when the structure is examined it is Problems are: 1. Keys participating Stakeholder have changed 2. Many of same people are still there ten or twenty years later. Exclusive club 3. At high level believe delivering to man in the street ,but actually too disconnected because of flux and
4. Political links, influence, undermining of outcomes 5. Downgrade of NEDLAC by government, with a few exceptions 6. Insufficient discussions or acknowledgement about the changing environment, impact on civil society 7. Undermined by its own proponents e.g. Millennium labour council
Since 2012 fragmented sector and splinter Trade Unions formed Changing worker voice Non delivery of expectations Not updating negotiation strategies: Needs based bargaining Not adjusting service delivery to constituency Adopting same approach as every one : Not using protest /strike methods to advantage Resistance to or lack of understanding of co determination mandates Governance is lacking Rise in unprotected strikes Not adjusting to changing world of work
Need to be unified as one voice, challenges across race, political influence and status Until recently very influenced by political environment Insufficient focus given to negotiations, structures etc. by the “right” people Initially not given senior focus ,this has changed Government as employer ,clouded some outcomes
Labour market over 20 years has not really improved: High levels of unemployment, working poor. Education levels remain single biggest challenge, growing right employees for changing work Skills still scarce ,move of Seta from direct workplace link in government Still Racially divided Fractious and rising conflict: Increased citizen impatience, community protests and political formations becoming mirrored in workplace relationships Gini coefficient rising Political uncertainty Role of modern technology
Macro level Need a full and proper labour market review Need to have an indaba with a view to forming social compact that looks to balance entrenched productivity at workplaces, while maintaining protections per industry and sector Leadership commitment Political support for existing labour market programs ,aligned across government Examine the role the media plays in wage negotiations
Micro level Encourage adherence to intention of labour laws Reduce excessive policy drafting at workplaces Stimulate dialogue, workplace mediations Move away from excessive proceduralism and legalism Encourage parties to engage constructively, examine different ways of getting consensus Review the many” bites” approach to workplace discipline Look at properly using all the “shades of grey” that are available in law Encourage use of “other” DR bodies for more sophisticated parties Regulate consultants in labour field Draft ,review and regularly revise code of good practice www.erexchange.co.za
Nerine Kahn
Mobile: 082 854 4454 Switchboard: 011 259 4385 E-mail: nerine@erexchange.co.za info@erexchange.co.za
The IQ Business Park Nr 3 Third Avenue Rivonia