Ethernet over MPLS tests Marcin Garstka, Pozna Supercomputing and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ethernet over mpls tests
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ethernet over MPLS tests Marcin Garstka, Pozna Supercomputing and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ethernet over MPLS tests Marcin Garstka, Pozna Supercomputing and Networking Centre Copenhagen, 20 November 2012 The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Communitys Seventh Framework Programme


slide-1
SLIDE 1

connect • communicate • collaborate

Ethernet over MPLS tests

Marcin Garstka, Poznań Supercomputing and Networking Centre Copenhagen, 20 November 2012

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 238875 (GÉANT)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

connect • communicate • collaborate

Agenda

Summary of the technology Technology testing: OAM Protection and Restoration Multidomain Multicast EoMPLS services over MPLS-TP

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

connect • communicate • collaborate

Ethernet over MPLS

Layer 2 transport over an IP/MPLS network Multiple Layer 2 technologies, Ethernet dominating nowedays Point-2-Point (VPWS, Layer 2 VPN) and Multipoint-2-Multipoint (VPLS) services Layer 2 multicast using point-to-multipoint LSPs as an emerging service

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

connect • communicate • collaborate

Data Plane

IP/MPLS network Pseudowire transport RSVP or LDP to establish Label Switched Paths RSVP has traffic engineering functions and Fast Reroute Layer 2 functions (e.g. MAC learning) for VPLS only on edge routers Backbone routers not aware of the services

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

connect • communicate • collaborate

Control Plane

2 protocols: BGP (with neighbour autodiscovery) LDP (simpler but without autodiscovery)

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

connect • communicate • collaborate

Tests on Juniper routers

The purpose of the tests was to assess the status of implementation of selected VPWS and VPLS features on commercially available routers. The selected features are either new or interesting for research and education networks. The ultimate goal of the tests was to verify if the Ethernet over MPLS technology fulfills selected requirements for Carrier Class Transport Network Technologies identified in [GN3-09-224_DJ1.1.1]. Tests executed on Juniper Networks routers. Juniper MX-series routers (MX-240, MX-480 and MX-960), software 11.1R2.3.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

connect • communicate • collaborate

7

Ethernet OAM tests

slide-8
SLIDE 8

connect • communicate • collaborate

802.1ag Connectivity Fault Management and MPLS trace test

8

Continuity Check Protocol Linktrace Protocol MPLS Trace

No MIPs or MEPs possible on transit routers Continuity Check Protocol was able to indicate loss and restoration

  • f connectivity

Linktrace was able to trace the connection but not able to locate the

  • utage

MPLS Trace was able to trace the path but not able to locate the

  • utage

MAC Ping also tested with positive results

slide-9
SLIDE 9

connect • communicate • collaborate

Y.1731 Ethernet frame delay measurement test

9

One-way and Two- way frame delay and frame delay variation measured in the Customer Domain Not supported in the Provider Domain on the routers used for tests

slide-10
SLIDE 10

connect • communicate • collaborate

Y.1731 ETH-AIS test

10

Not supported by Juniper

slide-11
SLIDE 11

connect • communicate • collaborate

11

Protection and Restoration tests

slide-12
SLIDE 12

connect • communicate • collaborate

MPLS Fast Reroute in VPWS and VPLS test

12

Without Fast Reroute With Fast Reroute Recovery time [ms] Recovery time [ms] BGP-signaled VPWS 190 21 LDP-signaled VPWS 187 22 BGP-signaled VPLS 334 25 LDP-signaled VPLS 346 22

RSVP with Fast Reroute (Link Protection)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

connect • communicate • collaborate

BFD and MPLS Fast Reroute test

13

Without BFD With BFD Recovery time Recovery time BGP-signaled VPWS 21 seconds 72 ms LDP-signaled VPWS 26 seconds 72 ms BGP-signaled VPLS 20 seconds 76 ms LDP-signaled VPLS 25 seconds 70 ms

In bigger networks such short times will not be possible.

BFD for ISIS (minimum interval 10, multiplier 2) RSVP with Fast Reroute (Link Protection)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

connect • communicate • collaborate

14

Multi-domain tests

slide-15
SLIDE 15

connect • communicate • collaborate

Multi-domain 802.1ag and MPLS Trace test

15

Labelled unicast Inter-AS option C – eBGP between Route Reflectors (not ASBRs) for VPN routes redistribution Cointinuity Check Protocol and Linktrace protocol properly indicated loss of connectivity in the Provider Domain The protocols cannot be used in the Operator Domain (single AS) MPLS trace not supported for inter-AS option C

slide-16
SLIDE 16

connect • communicate • collaborate

Multi-domain restoration test

16

The LSP was successfully rerouted to link P2-P3 when link P1-PE2 was disconnected. The time needed for service restoration was 31 ms.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

connect • communicate • collaborate

17

Multicast in VPLS tests

slide-18
SLIDE 18

connect • communicate • collaborate

Multicast in VPLS tests

18

Efficient multicast replication with P-to-MP LSPs The same router can serve as transit and access Service restoration tested when

  • ne of the links was disconnected
slide-19
SLIDE 19

connect • communicate • collaborate

19

VPWS and VPLS over MPLS/TP tests

slide-20
SLIDE 20

connect • communicate • collaborate

Multicast in VPLS tests

20

EoMPLS services demonstrated

  • ver LSPs provisioned by ASPEN

Network Manager

slide-21
SLIDE 21

connect • communicate • collaborate

Summary

21

Ethernet over MPLS proved to be a technology carriers and NRENs should consider for their networks OAM Fast recovery Multidomain operations L2 multicast

slide-22
SLIDE 22

connect • communicate • collaborate

22

Thank you very much

Questions ?