The Residences at
Existing Proposed DAP Zoning and Benefits for Community The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Existing Proposed DAP Zoning and Benefits for Community The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
City of Berkeley The Residences at Zoning Adjustments Board Berkeley Plaza September 10, 2015 Existing Proposed DAP Zoning and Benefits for Community The Residences at Berkeley Plaza DAP Zoning requirements for all projects: $6,040,000
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
DAP Zoning and Benefits for Community
DAP Zoning requirements for all projects:
- $6,040,000 to Affordable Housing Trust Fund
- LEED Gold or equivalent
- Privately owned public open space
- $491,000 SOSIP fees
- 2 transit passes/dwelling unit (one required)
- 5 publicly accessible car share spaces
- Enhanced streetscape
- Nearly $1,000,000 annual economic benefit,
including more than $775,000 per year in direct property tax increase
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Council Guidance on Significant Benefits
- Payment of $100/rentable residential square foot 75’-120’
- Payment of $150/rentable residential square foot 121’-180’
The total for Berkeley Plaza is more than $13MM in additional community benefit value.
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Comparison to Other Jurisdictions
Council guidance on Community Benefits reflects higher land value recapture than other Bay Area jurisdictions.
City Project Name Project Value Benefits Value Methodology/Examples of Benefits Walnut Creek Broadway Plaza (Macerich) Development Agreement $250,000,000-$300,000,000 <5% of total estimated project cost Cash payment, contribution to free shuttle, public plaza, streetscape Richmond Chevron Modernization Project $1,000,000,000 8% of total project cost Annual payment to the City to fund various community programs Mountain View 420 San Antonio Rd (Pillar Group/Kalic) $200,000,000 5.7 Acres; 373 D.U.; 10,000 sf retail. $20 per net rentable square foot of floor area. Direct Cash Payment to City Mountain View 405 San Antonio Rd (Merlone Geier Partners) $400,000,000 Phase 2: 9.9 acres, 1,080,800 GSF; 360,909 sf office; 107,835 sf commercial; 1410 seat cinema, 167 room hotel Phase 2: $7M-$9M. Direct Cash Payment to City Berkeley Berkeley Plaza $120,000,000 $27 M approx. 23% of total project costs Project labor agreement, new theaters
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Third Party Evaluation of Fee Amounts
Independent analysis by AECOM found fee set by Council is higher than their analysis recommends:
- Additional value for residential square footage 75’-120’ averages to $50
per square foot, rather than $100 suggested by Council
- Additional value for residential square footage 121’-180’ averages $120
per square foot, rather than $150 suggested by Council
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Total Amount per Council Guidance
Level Total Residential
- Sq. Ft.
Community Benefit Fee Total 75-120’ 70,205 $7,020,500 Total 120’ to Top 43,370 $6,504,000 Total Fee $13,524,500
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Project Community Benefits Proposal
Additional Community Benefit/Land Value Recapture Actual $ Value Project Union Labor Construction Agreement $10,000,000 Movie Cinema Complex Construction $17,420,000 Additional Payments (includes $250,000 for Habitot) $350,000 Total $27,770,000
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Project Labor Agreement
- 100% union participation – no trade or work
exclusions
- All trades represented (28 trades) for all work
through initial tenant improvements
- Anticipated to create 250-300 union construction
jobs for 2-3 years for Berkeley and Alameda County workers
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Movie Theater Construction
- Current Landmark Theatres proposal: 10 theaters
- f varying sizes
- Current configuration designed by architects for
Landmarks Theares
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Additional Payment
- $350,000 additional payment
- Including $250,000 for Habitot
- Remaining amount per ZAB direction, such
as for Affordable Housing Trust Fund
QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION
The Residences at Berkeley Plaza
Summary of CEQA Alternatives Infeasibility
Preservation or “Environmentally Superior” Alternative
- Requires two fire life safety cores be constructed from the bottom of the
building to the top for substantial additional cost
- Reduces dwelling unit total by 35%
“Contextual Alternative”
- Dwelling unit reduction of up to 24%
- Cinema retention infeasible. Reduces the theater space by about 8,000 square