EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF SECONDARY EMISSION CONTROL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

experimental and numerical modelling of secondary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF SECONDARY EMISSION CONTROL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF SECONDARY EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM OF BOF (BASIC OXYGEN FURNACE) T. LAJOS, G. KRISTF, J. M. SUDA Department of Fluid Mechanics Budapest University of Technology and Economics Gy. FEHR, I. MSZROS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Conference on Modelling Fluid Flow (CMFF’03)

  • T. LAJOS, G. KRISTÓF, J. M. SUDA

Department of Fluid Mechanics Budapest University of Technology and Economics

  • Gy. FEHÉR, I. MÉSZÁROS

DUNAFERR Danube Iron and Steel Corporation

EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF SECONDARY EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM OF BOF (BASIC OXYGEN FURNACE)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Secondary emission of BOF technology

The most serious air pollution of steel production occurs when hot iron is charged from a ladle into the converter vessel filled partly with scrap (mass of solid pollutants is 10−20 kg/cycle, concentration: 1- 2 g/m3). The space available for the hood capture system is limited by the

  • peration of crane.

Aim of investigation was to find appropriate hood capture system and to predict its capture efficiency.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Solution of the problem: combined application of model experiment and CFD

Flow characteristics: temperature of hot gases is

  • appr. 1000°C. Gas velocity in

the opening of the vessel of D=2.6 m diameter is about 8 −10 m/s. Hot gas jet flow is strongly influenced by buoyancy force. High temperature exhaust gas escaping the converter was modelled with hot air in a 1:20 scale model.

1 2 3 4 5 11 12 6 7 8 13

NYM1 NYM3 NYM2 SM2 SM3 NYM3 HM5 TM1 HM1 SM1 HM4 HM2

9 14

NYM4 HM3 TM2

10

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Experimental setup

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Considerations of modelling

a) Flow similarity: the buoyancy forces influence the shape

  • f hot gas jet

b) Evaluation of capture efficiency: simple and reliable method for evaluating different hood and exhaust variations c) Flow visualisation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

a) Flow similarity

inertia/buoyancy forces at full scale and model should be identical ⇒ model discharge velocity can be determined from full scale discharge velocity, model scale and temperature ratio

b) Evaluation of capture efficiency

At measuring heat flux entering the capture hood thermal stratification of air removed by the hood should be considered : a) either by measuring velocity and temperature distribution or b) by mixing of air layers of different temperatures

FrM=Fr

T T D D ∆ ∆ =

M M M

v v

( ) ,

g ρ ρ D v ρ Fr

g a 2 g 2

− =

vessel converter the from discharged flux heat hood capture the entering flux heat CE =

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mixing of stratified flow

Numerical simulation of the flow in a labyrinth (FLUENT 5.5)

c) Flow visualisation by transilluminating the hot gas flow

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Numerical simulation of flow in hood capture system model

a) The geometry of simulation model was scaled after the experimental setup. Outlet air velocity and temperature have been taken from the laboratory scale model. b) Symmetry assumption with respect to the mid-plane of the facility was

  • employed. The grid consisted of

approximately 250,000 tetrahedral cells. c) Hot gas was introduced to the computational domain through a velocity inlet, and pressure outlets were applied on the remaining boundary surfaces. d) Air density was computed from the incompressible ideal gas model as a function of local temperature. e) Time dependent simulation was applied and turbulent transport was computed with Renormalisation Group k−e model.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Calculated flow field of hot gas jet (FLUENT 5.5)

Velocity vectors and pathlines are coloured by velocity

  • magnitude. Temperature distribution belongs to a given phase
  • f the charging process.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Influence of relationship of mass flows

qm,out[kg/s] = 14,5 14,5 7,25 qm,exh[kg/s] = 136 68 68 qm,out/qm,exh = 0,107 0,213 0,107 CE [%] = 86 57 100 The simulation results prove the significance of similarity requirement: Frm=Fr

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Analyses of the charging process

a) Capture efficiency was mostly affected by the position of charging ladle. b) When using the hood of optimized geometry CE=0.87 was measured without charging ladle. In the first phase of the charging process, when ladle approaches the jet, the capture efficiency decreases to CEmin=0.54 because of interaction between the jet and ladle. c) At the end of the charging when the open-cross section of the ladle approaches the vertical, the capture efficiency increases rapidly and reaches 100%. d) So the average capture efficiency (estimated to 75−85%) depends also on the pace of the charging determined by the crane operator. To improve the capture efficiency, the construction of the charging vessel should be changed in order to avoid the “adherence” of the jet to the charging ladle.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

  • Experimental investigations on a scale model are reliable

tools for development of air pollution control systems in metallurgy, removing in general hot gases. In order to ensure flow similarity, the Froude number for model and prototype should be identical.

  • Measurement and comparison of exhaust and discharge

heat fluxes proved to be a suitable method for determining the capture efficiency of the pollution control system.

  • Interaction between the jet and charging ladle influences

the capture efficiency significantly.

  • The results of the 3D numerical simulation agreed well with

the results of measurements, so CFD can efficiently be used in solving similar air pollution control problems in metallurgy.