Experimental investigation of old R/C frames strengthened against - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

experimental investigation of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Experimental investigation of old R/C frames strengthened against - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Experimental investigation of old R/C frames strengthened against earthquakes by high dissipation steel link elements A.A. Karalis & K.C. Stylianidis Laboratory of R/C and Masonry Structures, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Presentation Professor K.C. Stylianidis

Experimental investigation of

  • ld R/C frames strengthened

against earthquakes by high dissipation steel link elements

A.A. Karalis & K.C. Stylianidis Laboratory of R/C and Masonry Structures, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece T.N. Salonikios Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

ABSTRACT

  • Use of steel bracing elements for the strengthening of old reinforced

concrete (R/C) frames is presented.

  • The inelastic deformations are purposely concentrated to a short

steel link element connecting the steel bracing to the R/C frame.

  • In the present work results are presented from the pilot test of three

specimens.

  • The first specimen was a typical one bay, single storey old RC frame.
  • The other two were identical to the first one, strengthened by two

different types of steel link elements.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

SPECIMENS

Geometry and reinforcement arrangement

  • Construction scale 1:3.
  • Layout of the reinforcement,

steel and concrete quality and type of reinforcement bars (smooth) selected to simulate R/C frames constructed according to

  • lder codes using past

construction techniques.

  • Anchorage length of the steel

bars small, contrary to modern code provisions.

  • Smooth steel bars for the longitudinal reinforcement fy/fu = 450/540MPa

and for stirrups fy/fu = 265/390MPa.

  • Steel link elements fy/fu = 300/375MPa.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • Specimen F1 is a bare reference frame.
  • Bracing system was placed as in the other two

specimens, but without the link element, to ensure the same geometrical conditions for all the specimens concerning the free height of the columns.

F1 F2 F3

  • In the other two specimens

the bracing system was connected at the middle of the top beam by a steel link element that was different for each specimen:  rectangular shaped cross section (specimen F2)  I shaped cross section (specimen F3)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

  • Horizontal loads imposed in a displacement

control mode. 12 levels of displacement for the strengthened specimens F2 and F3 and 16 levels of displacement for the bare frame

  • F1. For each displacement level, two full

cycles were imposed.

  • The specimens were instrumented by the use
  • f seven LVDTs.
  • Tests carried out at the Lab. of Concrete

and Masonry Structures, University of Thessaloniki.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

TEST RESULTS Specimen F1

  • At early stages, during the first

imposed cyclic displacements, horizontal or inclined cracks appeared, initially at the base and later at the top of the columns.

  • The cracks at the base of the

columns were formed just over the connection point of the bracing system to the columns.

  • Under high level of imposed

displacements, plastic hinges were formed at the ends of the columns of the specimens.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Specimen F1

  • Strength of the specimen

was slightly increased even for drifts close to 3%.

  • Very low strength

degradation.

  • This response is attributed

to the prevailing flexural type of failure.

  • Pinching is evident during

unloading.

  • Taking into account the poor detailing of the specimen, the load –

displacement hysteresis loops are rather rich, characteristic of the relatively high energy dissipation capacity of the system.

  • Only a small reduction of the strength and the dissipation capacity is
  • bserved during second cycles.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Specimen F2

  • The failure mode is the same as

in F1, since plastic hinges are formed again at the top and the bottom of the columns.

  • When the drift reaches about 1.2%, the steel link

element reveals a failure of a rather shear type, with a side to side horizontal crack at the top and the bottom ends.

  • The midpoint of the beam suffers

some local cracking, but the cracking is not significant enough to alter the failure mode.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Specimen F2

  • Steel link elements

significantly increased stiffness, strength and energy dissipation capacity.

  • Specimen F2 presents

an excellent behaviour up to a drift of 1.2%.

  • The load carrying capacity is three times higher than that of the reference

specimen F1, the hysteresis loops are very rich, no pinching is traced.

  • After the complete detachment of the link element, the overall behaviour,

concerning strength and energy dissipation capacity, drops to the behaviour of the reference specimen.

  • No signs of unfavorable phenomena, such as considerable drop of

strength during imposed reversals and pinching, are traced.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Specimen F3

  • Specimen F3 reveals an even better behaviour compared to F2. Failure
  • ccurs at a drift of 1.8%. At that level of drift the steel link element

reveals a rather bending type of failure.

  • Load carrying capacity is almost four times higher than that of the

reference specimen F1, the hysteresis loops are also very rich, again no pinching is traced.

  • Again, no unfavorable phenomena are evident.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

COMPARISON BETWEEN SPECIMENS

Load – displacement (P – δ) envelopes (first cycles only)

  • Strengthened specimens F2 and F3 are stiffer and stronger, about three

and almost four times respectively in comparison to the reference specimen F1.

  • Specimen F3 appears to behave better than the specimen F2 since it

reveals higher strength and deformation capacity.

  • Loads are

calculated as the mean of the absolute values of the positive and negative load carrying capacity at each displacement level.

STRENGTH

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

COMPARISON BETWEEN SPECIMENS

Energy dissipation – displacement (E – δ) envelopes (first cycles only)

  • At displacement levels where the links are active, the strengthened

specimens can dissipate energy about ten times than that of the reference specimen. Again, specimen F3 seems to behave better than the specimen F2.

ENERGY DISSIPATION

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

CONCLUSIONS

  • The use of steel link elements for the improvement of the seismic

response of existing buildings is a low cost, low technology level and fully reversible method.

  • In the case of open ground floors, the local application of the

technique practically causes no inconvenience for the users.

  • Under excessive seismic conditions the damage is expected to

concentrate to the steel links only, which can easily be replaced.

  • Steel link elements can increase considerably the stiffness and the

strength but they mainly increase the energy dissipation capacity.

  • By a thorough selection of the geometrical dimensions and the shape

and the material quality of the steel link elements, the unfavorable early local failure at the middle of the top beam of an existing R/C frame can be prevented.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

  • There is a need for careful design of the connection of the steel link

element to the R/C top beam.

  • Analytical research to simulate the experiments has already started

and the results are encouraging.

  • Further experimental research effort is under way to improve the

advantages of steel link elements for the strengthening of existing R/C frames.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The work presented here is part of a broader program partially sponsored by the Greek Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization, the contribution of which is gratefully acknowledged.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15