File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

file storage and file sharing for human rights
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations A design research case study Organizational Deployment of Secure Distributed Storage with Tahoe-LAFS project, supported by the Open Technology Fund Least Authority / Allon Bar &


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Organizational Deployment of Secure Distributed Storage with Tahoe-LAFS project, supported by the Open Technology Fund Least Authority / Allon Bar & Abigail Garner FOSDEM 2020 / 02 / 02

File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations A design research case study

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

About this project

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

  • Making secure file sharing and storage easier to use for

human rights organizations

  • Using Tahoe-LAFS, a decentralized, secure file system
  • 4 partner organizations:

○ Sursiendo — Mexico ○ Paradigm Initiative — Nigeria ○ The BachChao Project — India ○ ADC — Argentina

About this project:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Why human rights

  • rganizations?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

  • Collecting and storing very sensitive data
  • High risk / high impact when files are compromised
  • Limited resources and time to learn new tools
  • Aligned with Least Authority’s mission

Why focus on human rights organizations?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

What did we want to learn?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Study goal

Describing file storage and sharing needs of human rights

  • rganizations

Phase 1 Feb. - Oct. 2019

Methodology

  • Selecting human rights
  • rganizations
  • Survey on file storage /

sharing

  • Follow-up foundational

interviews (1 in-person, 3 remote)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Study goals

Describing file storage, sharing and collaboration use cases for human rights organizations Describing sharing experiences

  • f people working for human

rights organizations using Gridsync

Phase 2 Nov. 2019 - Aug. 2020

Methodology

  • Foundational interviews

focused on file sharing/collaboration (3 in-person, 2 remote).

  • Moderated usability test

(2 in-person, 2 remote), using Gridsync (a GUI for Tahoe-LAFS) on their

  • wn computers.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

What did we learn?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Phase 1 Needs finding

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Organizations have different file storage and sharing needs

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

  • Security threats inform security practices
  • File size
  • Collaboration needs
  • Ease of use
  • Privacy features/reputation
  • Cost
  • Partner choice...

Choosing tools

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Partners of human rights

  • rganizations

influence tool choice

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Collaboration is an important use case

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

  • Focus on collaboration/sharing use cases:
  • Version control
  • improved sharing workflow
  • Ease of use

Recommendations (incl.)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Phase 2: Sharing/ collaboration needs + usability

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Version control important when collaborating

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Four identified needs:

  • Viewing/restoring earlier versions
  • Viewing tracked changes (comparison mode)
  • Viewing when changes were made
  • Viewing who has made changes

Version control important when collaborating

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Sharing usability in Gridsync

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Sharing a folder in Gridsync

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Initiating sharing not so intuitive

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

One of the ways to initiate a sharing action in Gridsync

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Another way to initiate a sharing action in Gridsync

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

People grasp well that sharing is bidirectional

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

  • Version control:
  • Previous versions
  • When
  • Who (explore)
  • Sharing workflow
  • User interface / copy to reflect user intent
  • More guidance
  • More user testing

Recommendations (incl.)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Process lessons

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Allow ample time for strategic

  • utreach to

identify ideal partners.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Provide incentives that value partners’ time and expertise.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Define clear expectations and commitment.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Low-bandwidth and other connectivity limitations

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Respect privacy needs

  • f organizations and

individuals. Ask before making information public.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Next steps

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

More resources

Least Authority website Blog post about this project Tahoe-LAFS website Gridsync on Github Magic Folders on Github Magic Wormhole on Github

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Least Authority / File storage and file sharing for human rights organizations / FOSDEM 20

Questions?