Financial Need and Aid Volatility among Students with Zero Expected - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Financial Need and Aid Volatility among Students with Zero Expected Family Contribution

Robert Kelchen Assistant Professor Department of Education Leadership, Management and Policy Seton Hall University robert.kelchen@shu.edu, @rkelchen April 6, 2014

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 1 / 22

1

Introduction

2

Research questions

3

Data and methods Data Methods

4

Results

5

Conclusion and future work

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 2 / 22

Motivation

Students from high-income families are six times more likely to complete a bachelor’s degree by age 25 than those from low-income families (Bailey & Dynarski, 2011) Number of students with financial need has exploded in recent years This has far outstripped growth in financial aid programs Need to consider how to targeted aid to the neediest students

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 3 / 22

Calculating EFCs

Based on FAFSA data Dependents: Considers student and parent income and assets Independents: Considers student and spouse (if married) income and assets

EFCs calculated differently based on whether an independent student has any dependents

EFCs often used for aid eligibility, including Pell Grant

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 4 / 22

Zero EFC

Students with zero EFC considered to have the greatest need Three ways to get zero EFC:

1

Automatic zero EFC: Household income below $24,000 and meet federal benefit criteria

2

Simplified FAFSA–assets not considered: Household income below $50,000 and meet federal benefit criteria

3

Full FAFSA: Receive zero EFC by a result of the full formula

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 5 / 22

Concerns with zero EFC

Values artificially truncated at zero Calls for negative EFC (e.g. Center for Law and Social Policy, 2013; Goldrick-Rab, 2014; McSwain, 2008) Could mask a great deal of heterogeneity Inability to target the most limited resources (SEOG) to students who need them the most

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 6 / 22

Research questions

I used nationally-representative data and student-level FAFSA data to explore the following questions:

1

What are the characteristics of zero EFC students?

2

How often do zero EFC students have a zero EFC in the following years? Do they continue to be Pell-eligible?

3

How do the above two questions vary based on how the EFC was assigned (automatic zero EFC, simplified FAFSA, or full FAFSA)?

I also explored the feasibility of calculating negative EFCs

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 7 / 22

Trends in zero EFC receipt

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 8 / 22

Trends in zero EFC receipt

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011

Pct Pell Recipients with Zero EFC by Dependency and Year

Dependent Independent Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 9 / 22

Research on income volatility

Jacobs (2007): Nearly 10% of working-age households saw incomes fall by more than half in a two-year period Growing volatility in household incomes over time, particularly toward the bottom of the income distribution (e.g. Dynan et al., 2007; Gottschalk & Moffitt, 2009; Wagmiller & Smith, 2012) But how does this affect students’ financial aid awards?

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 10 / 22

Research on financial aid volatility

Most research has been on prior prior year (PPY) income data

Allows for look at year-over-year changes

Large changes in income for aid filers (ASCFA, 1997; Madzelan, 1998) But changes in Pell awards would be smaller and less frequent (Dynarski & Wiederspan, 2012; Kelchen & Jones, 2013) Heller (2006) found that 80% of FRL-eligible 11th graders got the Pell Grant two years later

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 11 / 22

Data

National comparisons using NPSAS waves from 1996-2012 and 2004 BPS cohort Other analyses conducted using nine-institution dataset of FAFSA filers from NASFAA

2 community colleges, 5 public research universities, and 2 private four-year colleges Data for FAFSA filers from 2007-08 through 2011-12 152,874 students: 68% dependent, 18% independent without dependents, 13% independent with dependents

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 12 / 22

Summary statistics

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Auto zero Simplified Full

Zero EFC by FAFSA Type and Dependency, 9-Campus Sample

Dependent Independent, no dependents Independent, with dependents

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 13 / 22

Methods

Examined trends over time in zero EFC receipt using NPSAS Examined trends in continued zero EFC/Pell receipt in BPS and institutional data Calculated negative EFCs by allowing the following FAFSA elements to remain negative:

Student and parent/spouse income: Taxable/untaxed income and wages, contribution from adjusted available income Assets: Parent/student business and investment assets (full FAFSA

• nly)

Did not truncate negative asset contributions

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 14 / 22

Limitations

Institutional sample is only nine colleges and has no for-profits Students only observed when they refiled the FAFSA at the same college No information on academic outcomes in my data Also missing low-income students who didn’t file the FAFSA

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 15 / 22

Trends in zero EFC rates

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012

Zero EFC Receipt by Dependency Status and Year (NPSAS)

Dependent Independent, no dependents Independent, with dependents

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 16 / 22

Trends in zero EFC rates

10 20 30 40 50 60 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012

Zero EFC by Sector and Year (NPSAS)

Public 2-year Public 4-year Private 4-year For-profit

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 17 / 22

Zero EFC and Pell renewal rates

10 20 30 40 50 60

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Pell Renewal Rates by Year, Zero EFC in 2003-04 (BPS)

None Partial Full (zero EFC)

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 18 / 22

Zero EFC renewal rates

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Dependent Independent, no dependents Independent, with dependents

Zero EFC Renewal Rates (9-college sample)

Auto zero Simplified FAFSA Full FAFSA

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 19 / 22

Continued zero EFC renewal rates

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Dependent Independent, no dependents Independent, with dependents

Zero EFC Rates Two Years Later (9-college sample)

Auto zero Simplified FAFSA Full FAFSA

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 20 / 22

Estimating negative EFCs

About 80% of students with an automatic zero EFC would qualify for a negative EFC, if possible Their typical negative EFC would be around $7,000 for dependents and $2,000 for independents with dependents Nearly everyone with a zero EFC from a simplified for full FAFSA would get a negative EFC Negative EFCs larger (more negative) for full FAFSA due to more chances for negative values

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 21 / 22

Conclusion and future work

Zero EFC students are a heterogeneous group May want to look at FAFSA filing status as a guide for allocating aid (more to auto zero) Consider the possibility of negative EFCs I’ll keep working on my calculations and the policy implications

Robert Kelchen (Seton Hall) Zero EFC Students April 6, 2014 22 / 22