Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO CTP Meeting Brian Wert, P.E. December - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
gaston cleveland lincoln mpo ctp meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO CTP Meeting Brian Wert, P.E. December - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 24, 2022 25 likes •236 views

Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO CTP Meeting Brian Wert, P.E. December 10, 2014 Agenda Project progress to date STIP review Survey analysis Vision statement implications Alternatives analysis preparation Next steps

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln MPO CTP Meeting

Brian Wert, P.E. December 10, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Project progress to date
  • STIP review
  • Survey analysis
  • Vision statement implications
  • Alternatives analysis preparation
  • Next steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quality Moment

Check your data early on

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Progress to Date

  • Initiated project
  • Developed draft goals and objectives survey
  • Developed draft vision statement
  • Deployed and deployed goals and objectives

survey

  • Began data collection
  • Began deficiencies analysis
  • Revised existing inventories
  • Began development of Gaston County inventory
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Schedule

  • September 2014 –CTP Kickoff Meeting
  • October 2014 – Finalize goals and objectives survey. Refine draft

vision statement. Begin data collection

  • November 2014 – Existing Conditions and begin to project future

traffic conditions and deficiencies

  • December/January 2015 – Establish and agree on current and

future deficiencies. Begin to develop scenarios. Finalize Survey Analysis

  • February 2015 - Finalize vision statement, goals, and objectives.

Finalize scenarios

  • March 2015 – Analyze alternative routes to address problems
  • May 2015 – Complete Draft CTP
  • Summer/Fall 2015 – Finalize CTP, public involvement, adoptions
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Draft STIP Review

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

  • Survey went live 10/22/2014
  • Closed on 12/1/2014
  • Over 644 responses including

hard copies

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 espondpsp yuotPnls

espondpsptaLtyuotPnls

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

55.84% 14.94% 29.22% 54.19% 25.19% 20.62% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% astonl edLSLdslu rylPndl

espondpsptaLtPnfdgLtrptPnfdgLtInofmTgund

pNgSLmx7LgPLlo 7nTNdsoynlx7LgPLlo

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

29 236 218 42 4 1 50 100 150 200 250

  • nxILdsm

pdyOFoxILdsm pnfLxenlOLtoynl nuLgsoLxenlOLtoynl LsSmxenlOLtoynl

  • gLfLxenlOLtoynl

NkTgtFsrsmtntPndspgundtTstLnftNummudtgntsogtsnstonrssdgpt TstTls

LtTnltLt

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

96 22 48 4 42 42 162 104 249 5 152 13 53 50 100 150 200 250 300

notsslp

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%

notsslp

nosd 7LgPLlo astonl 7LgPLlo edLSLdslu rylPndl 7LgPLlo

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

Note: Lower scores are more desirable

2.45 3.10 4.60 4.29 4.03 4.22 5.30 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 fTgnSLxloLgtLPoynlt uuxgsSLdxrslLt lPnNgsOLxI 7gnSyuLxoFLgxnuLt ryfyoxPPLttxnlx-L sPydyoyLt LuNPLxPPLttxon LytoylOxsPydyoyLt llnSsoySLxpogsoLOyLt

eTdtgkstNTLptgntonrstTtTumugL

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

316 133 240 133 6 52 154 91 143 8 33 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

uspgtTdpongTgundtppfsp

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

4.21 4.4 3.3 4.25 3. 3.69 3.5 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 ngLxgsltyo pLgSyPLxngxpTLPysd

  • LLut

enffNlyom 7gLtLgSsoynl lPgLstLuxnuL eFnyPL PnlnfyPxagnoF stoLgxgsSLdxyfLt LdysdLxgsSLdxyfLt

npgtongTdgtTdpongTgundtnTmp

Note: Lower scores are considered more important

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Draft Goals and Objectives Survey Analysis

112 1 33 26 49 20 50 100 150 200 250 300 NyduxuuyoynlsdxrslLt Nyduxsx-LxsPydyom enlogndxPPLtt fTgnSLxloLgtLPoynlt 7gnSyuLxdoLglsoySLxnuLt

  • FLg

NkTgtpknfmltastgkstupgtknustgntTmmsruTgstndspgund

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Vision Statement Implications

  • How does this impact the vision

statements?

  • What changes or clarifications should we

make?

  • What additional data does this committee

need?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Alternative Analysis Review

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Deficiencies Analysis: Final Product Example

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Next Steps

  • Finalize deficiency analysis
  • Set January meeting time
  • Complete goals and objectives survey

analysis

  • Begin to develop scenarios for analysis
  • Finalize vision statements and goals and
  • bjectives
slide-21
SLIDE 21

NCDOT Contacts

  • NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch (CTP):
  • Brian Wert, PE, bmwert@ncdot.gov, 919-707-0974
  • Division 12 Planning Engineer:
  • David Keilson, PE, dpkeilson@ncdot.gov, 704-480-9031
  • Board of Transportation Member:
  • Lou Wetmore, lswetmore@ncdot.gov, 828-323-8777
  • Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Metropolitan Planning Organization:
  • Hank Graham, AICP, hankg@cityofgastonia.com, 704-854-6663