Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours Eugene Hsieh, MDCM, FRCPC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gastrointestinal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours Eugene Hsieh, MDCM, FRCPC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pathology of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours Eugene Hsieh, MDCM, FRCPC Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Pathologist, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Assistant Professor, Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology Faculty of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pathology of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Eugene Hsieh, MDCM, FRCPC Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Pathologist, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Assistant Professor, Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

What pathologists do Historical considerations Macroscopic assessment of pathology specimens Microscopic features of GIST, and differential diagnosis Summary

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What does a pathologist do?

Pathology is the “study of disease”, so a pathologist studies disease. Many different types of pathology:

Anatomical pathology (which includes those who focus on surgical oncology specimens)

Study of tissue and organs Forensic pathology is a specialized branch

  • f anatomic pathology

Most tumour pathologists fall into this category Many subspecialties

Clinical pathology

Chemistry, microbiology, hematology

Molecular pathology

Study of molecules in tissue, organs, fluids. Crosses over with molecular biology and genetics.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Historical background – GIST - 1980s-2000ish

GIST in the old days was somewhat

  • f a garbage can diagnosis.

The term “GIST” included many tumours that were non-epithelial, meaning not derived from the lining cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Some “GIST” tumours were likely benign, while others were potentially malignant (cancerous).

Hard to separate them though, so very difficult for pathologists to diagnose these consistently, and specifically. Consequently, very difficult for clinicians to treat GIST, since it was such a mish-mash of different tumors.

Based on research in the 1980s and early 1990s and at the turn of this century, pathologists in the early 2000s restricted the diagnosis of “GIST” to a very specific subset of tumours.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Historical background

Most of this slide is wrong in 2013

GIST of the past:

Initially thought to be mainly smooth muscle in origin. Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology 8th Edition, 1996

Four major categories Smooth muscle origin Neural/nerve sheath origin Both SM and neural “Uncommitted”, often CD34+

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Historical background After 2000

The discovery of GISTs with alterations in c-Kit and related proteins, and their response to imatinib, prompted a radical reclassification of this class of tumours for pathology practice.

Now, a pathologist will not make a definitive diagnosis of GIST without evidence of the underlying molecular abnormalities of GIST:

Immunohistochemistry: c-Kit / CD117 protein

  • verexpression

Available in most larger pathology labs Although available widely, it takes expertise to perform properly Inexpensive Molecular diagnostics: c-Kit or PDGFRA mutation Available only in a subset of large academic pathology departments or specialized public

  • r private laboratories

Moderately costly

GIST diagnosis is typically confirmed at larger centres before treatment is initiated

slide-7
SLIDE 7

GIST Pathology

Most common soft tissue tumour of the gastrointestinal tract. Likely derived from Interstitial cell of Cajal.

Pacemaker cell of the gastrointestinal tract. Located in the muscular layer. Consequently, GIST usually involves the muscular wall, and may spare the mucosa. If it spares the mucosa, endoscopic biopsy may miss the lesion. Some endoscopists (surgeons, gastroenterologists) may attempt a biopsy on top of biopsy method, but bowel perforation can be a concern. These cells are found throughout the GI tract. So the tumours can be found throughout the GI tract as well. About 60% occur in the stomach, but 1/3rd occur in the small bowel (and cannot be seen in lower or upper endoscopy). Others may occur in large bowel or occasionally in mesentery without bowel involvement.

Most are sporadic, but 5% may be associated with a familial syndrome: Neurofibromatosis (NF1), Carney’s syndrome, Familial GIST syndrome

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Muscle layer, and ICC

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Macroscopic examination

Macroscopic tumour characteristics

Size Location: Organ, and organ site Necrosis (tumour death) Adequacy of excision – distance to margins Evidence of spread to serosal surface

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

GIST microscopic

Need to confirm it is GIST and not something else. Soft tissue tumour, but with spindle or epithelioid types (or mixed type) Mitoses & grade Necrosis and hyalinization – Radiologic measurement of tumour response is determined by tumour size, but some tumours may also respond by undergoing degeneration or hyalinization.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Case 1

Gastric tumour Clinically and radiologically thought to be GIST

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Spindle cell type GIST

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Epithelioid GIST

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Mitotic figures: More than 5 per “50” high power fields is higher risk

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Proving a tumour is GIST

Immunohistochemistry is extremely helpful. Our GIST immunohistochemistry panel includes

CD117 (c-Kit) – 95% of GISTs are positive CD34 – 2/3rds of GISTs are positive DOG1 (Discovered On GIST – vast majority of GIST positive) Desmin – GIST usually negative, found in smooth muscle SMA – GIST may be positive, but usually weak, found in smooth muscle S100 – GIST negative, found in nerve sheath tumours Beta-catenin – GIST nuclei negative, found in fibromatosis Ki67 – A proliferation marker

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CD117

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Desmin

slide-25
SLIDE 25

S100

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Case 2

Gastric tumour Clinically and radiologically thought to be GIST

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

CD117

slide-31
SLIDE 31

S100

slide-32
SLIDE 32

GIST diagnosis summary

Microscopically compatible with GIST. Pathologist must remember that GIST has multiple types including spindle cell, epithelioid, and mixed types, and may demonstrate features mimicking other tumour types. eg. Nuclear pallisading as seen in Schwannoma. Immunohistochemistry is crucial.

CD117 DOG1 CD34 S100 Desmi n SMA B-cat GIST + + +

  • +/-
  • Schwa

n-noma

  • +
  • S. M.

tumour

  • +

+

  • Fibro-

matosis

  • +/-

+

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Low Ki67

slide-35
SLIDE 35

What goes in a GIST report

Procedure and tumour site Tumour size and number GIST subtype Mitotic rate (which is grade), and optionally Ki67 Risk assessment Necrosis Margins TNM classification Status of CD117 and other immunohistochemistry DNA mutational status – KIT exon 11 vs exon 9 vs other: Differences in drug dosing, etc.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Main points of GIST report

Confirm it’s a GIST, and not something else. Confirm site, size, and grade to provide risk assessment Confirm CD117 positivity (or molecular evidence of c-KIT PDGFRA mutation)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Summary and comments

The pathological diagnosis of GIST only became accurate in the last decade or so. Still, GIST is uncommon enough that diagnosis in centres with specific GIST experience is preferred. Knowledge of GIST prior to the early 2000s was very poor amongst

  • pathologists. Knowledge increased dramatically after the characterization of

importance KIT in these tumours, and esp. after the introduction of imatinib as a treatment option. GIST represents a new paradigm in pathology, as it requires immunohistochemistry or molecular testing to confirm the diagnosis. The pathologist’s job is to accurately diagnose GIST, and to provide key predictive factors in the report. These include site, size, and mitotic rate/grade, and can include gene testing. Pathologists are still learning as more knowledge comes to light. Oncologic care involves proper communication between pathologists, basic scientists, surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, and other medical professionals, as well as (indirectly) with patients.