7/11/2016 1
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas Katarina Magulova BRS Secretariat
GLOBAL MONITORING PLAN UNDER THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION: OUTCOMES OF - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GLOBAL MONITORING PLAN UNDER THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION: OUTCOMES OF THE FIRST AND SECOND PHASES OF IMPLEMENTATION Katarina Magulova BRS Secretariat www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas 1 7/11/2016 Background and overview www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas 2
7/11/2016 1
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas Katarina Magulova BRS Secretariat
7/11/2016 2
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 3
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
ARTICLE 16 on Effectiveness Evaluation: Commencing four years after the date of entry into force of this Convention, and periodically thereafter at intervals to be decided by the Conference of the Parties, the Conference shall evaluate the effectiveness of this Convention. Evaluation of the progress of implementation of the Convention through:
Framework (UNEP/POPS/COP.6/27/Add.1/Rev.1) EEC (SC-7/24)
7/11/2016 4
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
ARTICLE 16 on Effectiveness Evaluation: In order to facilitate such evaluation, the Conference of the Parties shall, at its first meeting, initiate the establishment of arrangements to provide itself with comparable monitoring data on the presence of the chemicals listed in Annexes A, B and C as well as their regional and global environmental transport. These arrangements: (a) Should be implemented by the Parties on a regional basis when appropriate, in accordance with their technical and financial capabilities, using existing monitoring programmes and mechanisms to the extent possible and promoting harmonization of approaches; (b) May be supplemented where necessary, taking into account the differences between regions and their capabilities to implement monitoring activities; and (c) Shall include reports to the Conference of the Parties on the results of the monitoring activities on a regional and global basis at intervals to be specified by the Conference of the Parties.
7/11/2016 5
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
group prepared: Implementation Plan for the Global Monitoring Plan for Persistent Organic Pollutants adopted by decision SC-3/19, UNEP/POPS/COP.3/23/Rev.1
Global Monitoring Plan for POPs
(UNEP/POPS/COP.3/INF/14) Both documents are continuously updated – see further
a coordination mechanism for GMP: Regional Organization Groups (ROGs) and the Coordination Group under the GMP (GCG)
7/11/2016 6
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
NB: These documents are continuously updated
7/11/2016 7
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 8
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 9
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
The objective of monitoring activities is to generate comparable data on levels of POPs in core media:
Convention
= congeners, isomers, degradation products or parent compounds that bring most comprehensive information
MONET… human milk / blood: UNEP WHO, AMAP, national programmes..).
7/11/2016 10
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
In line with Article 16 2b (providing support to POPs monitoring arrangements):
Pacific Islands
the Pacific Islands
UNEP/GEF project “Assessment of Existing Capacity and Capacity Building Needs to Analyze POPs in Developing Countries” and updated in 2014)
7/11/2016 11
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 12
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
= all that to provide comparable information in all regions + also describes a harmonized regime for the preparation of monitoring reports
media (ambient air, human breast milk, blood + newly – surface water for PFOS)
2013 harmonized regime for monitoring reports…
http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ConferenceoftheParties/Meetings/CO P7/tabid/4251/mctl/ViewDetails/EventModID/870/EventID/543/xmid/130 75/Default.aspx
7/11/2016 13 7/11/2016 13
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Mandate Paragraph 5(d) of the terms of reference of the global coordination group for the global monitoring plan (SC-4/31). Periodicity Continuous process with new substances being listed in Annexes to the Convention. Last version Amended version presented at COP-7 Further amendments will be agreed at the 2016 GCG meeting
First and Second Expert Meeting to update the Guidance on the Global Monitoring Plan for POPs - Geneva, Switzerland, 12 - 14 April 2010 and 4 - 6 October 2010
7/11/2016 14 7/11/2016 14
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 15
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 16
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Second global monitoring report under development by the global coordination group for consideration by the effectiveness evaluation committee by 31 January 2016
7/11/2016 17
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Region Air Human matrices Water Other media Africa Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling Network (GAPS) MONET Africa UNEP GEF GMP1 project UNEP/WHO human milk survey UNEP GEF GMP1 project MONET Africa pilot project UNEP GEF pilot project Limited monitoring dealing with the contamination of water, soil, sediments and food by POP pesticides Asia Pacific POPs Monitoring Programme in East Asian Countries China national POPs monitoring programme Japan national monitoring programme MONET Fiji UNEP GEF GMP1 project China monitoring programme on human milk Japan POPs monitoring programme on human milk Japan monitoring programme on human blood UNEP/WHO human milk survey United Nations University program “Environmental Monitoring and Governance in the Asian Coastal Hydrosphere’’ National water monitoring programmes: China, Japan Japan national programme on water, ground water, bottom sediments, soil, biota, food CEE APOPSBAL Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) GAPS European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) MONET - Europe MONET - CEE MONET - CZ UNEP/WHO human milk survey Joint Danube Survey (2009) MONET-Europe NORMAN - NORMAN Association National programmes on e.g. soil, sediments and biota are available in the region but rather variable, episodic GRULAC GAPS Latin Passive Air Monitoring Network (LAPAN) UNEP GEF GMP1 project UNEP/WHO human milk survey UNEP GEF GMP1 project WEOG AMAP Australian Pilot Monitoring Programme –air (AGAM) EMEP GAPS Integrated Atmospheric Deposition Network (IADN)/ Environment Canada’s Air Monitoring in the Great Lakes Basin (GLB) Northern Contaminants Programme (NCP) Norwegian Troll Station Monitoring Network in the Alpine Region for Persistent and other Organic Pollutants (MONARPOP) MONET - Europe U.S. EPA’s National Dioxin Air Monitoring Network (NDAMN) UK-Norwegian Transect The UK Toxic Organic Micro Pollutants (TOMPs) AMAP Australia “snap shot” surveys (under the Australian pilot monitoring programme) CDC/CCEHIP/-NCEH CHMS and FNBI ESB Germany GerES New Zealand “snap shot” surveys Sweden national programmes: Uppsala, Stockholm UNEP/WHO human milk survey Australian Pilot Monitoring Programme International Council for Exploration
AMAP Australian Pilot Monitoring Programme Great Lakes HELCOM OSPAR MEDPOL NCP
7/11/2016 18
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
(a) Air monitoring: active sampling (b) Air monitoring: passive sampling (c) UNEP/WHO human milk survey (d) Sampling of PFOS in water
7/11/2016 19
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 20
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 21 7/11/2016 21
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Bahia Blanca, Argentina Lima, Peru Sao Jose, Brazil
7/11/2016 22
Belgium Russian Fed. Fiji New Zealand Haiti Brazil
C H A N G E S O V E R T I M E I N C O N C E N T R AT I O N S O F I N D I C AT O R P C B I N H U M A N M I L K ( S U M 6 P C B )
7/11/2016 23
C O N C E N T R AT I O N S O F I N D I C AT O R P C B I N H U M A N M I L K ( S U M 6 P C B )
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Ethiopia, 2012 Kenya,2009 Uganda, 2009 Mauritius, 2009 Djibouti, 2011 Mali,2009 Egypt, 2001 Niger, 2011 Congo (Dem.Rep.), 2009 Ghana, 2009 Togo, 2010 Sudan, 2006 Nigeria, 2008 Cote d'Ivoire, 2010 Senegal, 2009 Solomon Islands, 2011 Fiji, 2011 Tonga, 2008 Tuvalu, 2011 Fiji / Kadavu, 2011 Niue, 2011 Kiribati, 2011 Samoa, 2011 Kiribati, 2006 Indonesia, 2011 Fiji, 2006 Syria, 2009 Pacific States, 2011 India, 2009 Palau, 2011 Marshall Islands, 2011 Fiji, 2002 Tajikistan, 2009 Korea (Rep. of), 2008 Hong Kong, 2009 Philippines, 2002 Cyprus, 2006 Hong Kong, 2002 Hungary, 2006 Georgia, 2009 Hungary, 2001 Bulgaria, 2001 Lithuania, 2009 Moldava, 2009 Ukraine, 2001 Croatia, 2001 Russia, 2001-2002 Romania, 2001 Slovakc Rep., 2006 Czech Rep, 2006 Slovak, 2001 Czech Republic, 2001 Mexico, 2011 Chile, 2011 Chile, 2008 Haiti, 2011 Suriname, 2012 Peru, 2011 Brazil, 2001-2002 Jamaica, 2011 Barbados, 2010 Uruguay, 2009 Haiti, 2004 Antigua and Barbudam 2008 Cuba , 2011 New Zealand, 2011 Australia, 2010 Israel, 2012 Australia, 2002 Ireland, 2010 New Zealand, 2000 Finland, 2007 USA, 2003 Ireland, 2001-2002 Norway, 2006 Switzerland, 2009 Sweden, 2007 Finland, 2001 Luxembourg, 2006 Norway, 2001 Sweden, 2001 Belgium, 2002 The Netherlands, 2001 Luxemburg, 2002 Germany, 2002 Italy, 2001 Spain, 2001 Africa Asia and Pacific Central and Eastern Europe Latin America and Caribbean Western European and Other States
ng/g fat
7/11/2016 24
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 25
The worldwide implementation of the Global Monitoring Plan was made possible thanks to the generous contributions to the Stockholm Convention Voluntary Trust Fund from the Governments of Japan, Norway, Sweden, and through the European Commission’s Thematic Programme for Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources, including Energy (ENRTP). Further, the contribution of the projects to support POPs monitoring activities in regions, funded through the Global Environmet Facility (GEF) and the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM), is greatly acknowledged. Monitoring activities, and data collection and analysis are implemented in the five UN regions in cooperation with strategic partners and through involvement of Regional Organization Groups and Global Coordination Group.
7/11/2016 26
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
chm.pops.int
7/11/2016 27
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 28
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas Ana Priceputu BRS Secretariat
7/11/2016 29
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 30
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Online tool to store and visualize data on levels of POPs in core matrices reported through the Stockholm Convention’s GMP
presentation in regions with limited capacity
the frame of the GMP
and visualizing results of global POPs monitoring activities
and the broad public - launched on 7 May 2015
evaluation)
7/11/2016 31
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
with a uniform visualization interface
supporting broader comparability of available information
range of heterogeneous sources without compromising incoming information
7/11/2016 32
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 33
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 34
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 35
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 36
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 37
7/11/2016 38
7/11/2016 39
7/11/2016 40
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
7/11/2016 41 7/11/2016 41
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
IndicatorPCB
Dioxin-likePCB
Changes over time in concentrations of indicator PCB in humanmilk (Sum 6 PCB)
Belgium Russian Fed. FijiChanges over time in air concentrations of indicator PCB (Sum 6 PCB)
Payerne, Switzerland Sneznik, Czech Republic Lahemaa, Estoniapasive sampling active sampling
Pallas, Finland Kosetice, Czech RepublicMedian concentrations
in human milk
New Zealand Haiti BrazilChanges over time in air concentrations of d-l PCB (Sum 12 PCB) (passive sampling) PCB 18 Air concentrations of d-l PCB (Sum 12 PCB) (active sampling)
Kosetice, Czech RepublicChanges over time in concentrations of d-l PCB in human milk(Sum 12 PCB)
Norway Romania FijiMedian concentrations
in human milk
7/11/2016 42 7/11/2016 42
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Passive air sampling
Ambientair Humanmilk
Active air sampling Changes over time in air concentrations of DDT (Sum 6 DDT*) Changes over time in air concentrations of DDT (Sum 3 DDT**)
Zeppelinfjell, Norway Sneznik, Czech Republic Storhofdi, Iceland Pallas, Finland Kosetice, Czech Republic Bamako, Mali Reduit, Mauritius Bukit Kototabang, Indonesia Leova, Moldova Khartoum, SudanChanges over time in concentrations of DDT in humanmilk (Sum 6 DDT)
*Sum six DDT includes o,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDT, o,p‘- DDE, p,p'-DDE, o,p'-DDD and p,p'-DDD. **Sum three DDT includes p,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDE and p,p'-DDD.Medianconcentrations of Sum 6 DDT in humanmilk NB: a significant contribution of the DDE metabolite to the sum DDT suggests legacy contamination through past exposure.
7/11/2016 43
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
chm.pops.int
7/11/2016 44
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas