Health IT Status and perspectives Prof. Dr. med. Bjrn Bergh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

health it
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Health IT Status and perspectives Prof. Dr. med. Bjrn Bergh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Health IT Status and perspectives Prof. Dr. med. Bjrn Bergh Chairman Dept. of Information Technology and Clinical Engineering Professor for Medical Information Systems Heidelberg Castle Hospital + Med. Faculty Age 800 years 723 years


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Health IT Status and perspectives

  • Prof. Dr. med. Björn Bergh

Chairman – Dept. of Information Technology and Clinical Engineering Professor for Medical Information Systems

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Heidelberg

2

Castle Hospital + Med. Faculty Age 800 years 723 years (1386) Visitors 1.000.000 pa 1.300.000 pa

  • Av. length of stay

90 min. 1200 min. Ranking in Germany 9 1 (16 worldwide) Employees 57 8500 Beds (in use)

  • 1650 + (350) ~2000
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Centre of Information Technology and Medical Engineering (ZIM)

  • 175 staff members
  • Plan, purchase, deploy + operate
  • all IT infrastructure, applications (incl. RIS,

PACS, LIS. . .)

  • all medical devices + furniture
  • telephony, patient record archives…
  • Scientific unit
  • eHealth, systems integration, IT + engineering,

radiological informatics, digital signatures

  • Prof. Dr. Björn Bergh

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The status

  • Which industries come to your mind

completely supporting their main processes by IT?

  • Not Healthcare?
  • Why is that the case?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Core aspects

  • Technology
  • Products and solutions
  • Architecture
  • Standards
  • Acceptance/Usefulness
  • Perceived (Benefits)
  • Documented (Evidence, cost-benefit analysis)
  • Resources
  • Financial / Reimbursement
  • Staff

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Intra-institutional

  • Infrastructure

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Networking and mobility

  • Technology
  • Highspeed LAN + wired VOIP
  • WLAN + wireless VOIP
  • Mobile devices (Tablet, Laptop, PDA)
  • Apps for mobile devices
  • Resources (often in infrastructure)
  • Acceptance

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WLAN and services

SSID: 1 QoS SSID: 2 SSID: 3 SSID: 4 SSL Web VPN Server 2,4 Ghz

5 Ghz

SSID: 5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Future

  • WLAN as the global platform unifying services
  • Wireless VOIP (Professionals and patients)
  • Positioning (staff, devices)
  • Alarm (nurse call), call stratification, sensors
  • Monitoring
  • Entertainment
  • Something like the iphone?
  • Integration of medical devices!!
  • Safety + security

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Intra-institutional

  • Applications

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Major Applications - Technology

Finances Materials Controlling HR FM …

ERP

Patient index Registration Coding Billing ….

HIS

Digital Record Reports CPOE Scheduling OR Charting …

CIS

Images Multimedia

  • bjects

PACS

Enterprise resource planning HIS=Hospital Information system PAS=Patient administration system CIS=Clinical information system EPR, EMR= Electronic Patient (Medical) record

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Technology - Products

  • ERP + HIS: OK
  • CIS
  • Completeness
  • Robustness
  • Performance
  • Flexibility
  • Usability
  • PACS: OK
  • Architecture and standards

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Acceptance/Usefulness
  • Perceived (Benefits)
  • Documented (Evidence, cost-benefit analysis)
  • Resources
  • Financial / Reimbursement
  • Staff (bypass product deficits!)

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The future

  • Patient safety
  • Integration of medical devices
  • Integration of knowledge (decision support

systems)

  • Integration of clinical trials / data mining
  • Integration of biomolecular data

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

POCT Network

  • Point Of Care Testing
  • Decentral lab test (Gases,

sugar…)

  • Devices standardised
  • ca. 130 sugar (Roche)
  • 35 Gas (Bayer)
  • ca. 800-1000 POCT-orders/d
  • G-VLAN integration (vendor

neutral):

  • HL7: ADT + orders, results back
  • Security: partial
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Gateway

Lab LIS HIS

Gases

PoCT – Application Integration

PDMS

Sugar

BAR Code

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ECG

MegaCare Archiv ADT-Proxy Linux/Dräger SAP IS-H* med

Druckserver

EliLink Import-Service WEB-Service MegaCare System / Dienste

SiFor

Mortara EKG

XML EKG Worklist

File-Service Export EKG-PDF pull/transfer ADT unsolicited messages MegaCare Client InternetExplorer

  • mind. Sun Java 1.4.x

Infinity Network HL7 Interface

Infinity GW

Hausnetz Systemkonzept Infinity MegaCare UKL Heidelberg

Renatus Beck, Dräger medical GmbH, A.Buchauer 4.8.2008

Heik04 eGate

Leistungs- übermittlung Query ADT Data ADT Orders Url-Call

Import EKG

Print service

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cross-institutional

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Applications

  • Telemedicine + Home monitoring
  • Portals
  • Records (EHR, PHR, PEHR)
  • Ambient assisted living

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Experiences with eHealth

  • Teleradiology
  • Teleneurology
  • Tele-oncology (pediatric)
  • Home Care Monitoring
  • ….
  • The usage of separate Telemedicine

components is beneficial but:

  • Information from all HIT-systems and Home

Care belongs together!!

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Solution: a cross-institutional record

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

IT systems

HIS/CIS TMC system GP system Pharmacy system

Sensor Platform

Shared Care Record

EHR PHR Record of TMC

PHR Node

Communication Module Phone, Video Conf.

Sensors Patient + Family HC Professional

Consideration - Vision 1

  • Prof. Dr. B. Bergh - ZIM
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Record type Characteristics Main Advantages Main Disadv. EMR

Electronic Medical Record All clinical data of a patient to document, monitor and manage care delivery in

  • ne institution

Case-based accessible within the care delivery organisation (CDO) Not accessible for

  • ther doctors or

the patient

EHR

Electronic Health Record Subsets of each CDO‘s EMR presently assumed to include summaries (CCR, etc.) Longitudinal access across multiple institutions Viewing in other CDOs possilbe Easier data import from professional systems (high quality and completeness) No patient involvement for viewing and access management

PHR

Personal Health Record Contains patient input (home care devices, diet, sports). Acess for multiple institutions is managed by the patient Fully controled by the empowered patient No automated data import from

  • ther systems

EMR, EHR and PHR

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Two main issues anticipated with EHR

  • Architecture and systems integration

with standards

  • Ensure patient’s right for data privacy

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

EHR - Integration with standards?

25

Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard

Existing eHealth standards

slide-26
SLIDE 26

EHR - Integration with standards?

26

Existing eHealth standards Understandable and complete

Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard

slide-27
SLIDE 27

EHR - Integration with standards?

27

Existing eHealth standards Industry accepted and Implemented (EHR) Understandable and complete

27

Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard

slide-28
SLIDE 28

EHR - Integration with standards?

28

Existing eHealth standards Industry accepted and Implemented (EHR) Industry accepted and Implemented (HIS-CIS) Understandable and complete

28 28

Standard Standard

Do it yourself HL7 + DICOM => IHE

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Data Privacy and EHR

eHealth + EHRs are absolutely safe!

Goya

slide-30
SLIDE 30

EHR Data privacy study - Methods

  • Requirements analysis
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Data privacy officers
  • Review federal and state regulations

=> High level requirements

  • Technical capabilities
  • Access concepts HIS-CIS systems
  • Access concepts EHR projects and vendors
  • Matching requirements and capabilities

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

EHR Data privacy study - Results

No concept fulfils all needs!!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Goya

Data Privacy and EHR

eHealth + EHRs are totally safe! They most certainly are not!

Goya

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Solutions?

  • Full access for all HC professionals

and logging (patient surveilance)

  • Give the power to the

citizens/patients

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Our decision: Focus on the citizen/patient

Grant Wood

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Vision 2 - PEHR

Patient

Decides

  • who sees what
  • sees all accesses
  • chooses provider

Care providers Communicate only via the PEHR with each other

TELEMED Award 2008

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Core aspects

  • Technology
  • Products and solutions
  • Architecture
  • Standards
  • Acceptance/Usefulness
  • Perceived (Benefits)
  • Documented (Evidence, cost-benefit analysis)
  • Resources
  • Financial / Reimbursement
  • Staff

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

What is required?

  • Prof. Dr. Björn Bergh
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Raffaello Santi

Unite the Know-How

  • Create cooperation
  • Reports (Good eHealth Report)
  • more: structured, pitfalls, technology
  • Disseminate
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Give CIOs and citizens voice

Edvard Munch

  • EHTEL
  • e-HITS (European Health IT Society)
  • ICMCC (International Council on

Medical & Care Compunetics)

  • Patient organisations
  • Journals…
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Pablo Picasso

Unique ID (Europe?)

  • Citizens
  • HCP (Index)
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Piet Mondrian

Reference architectures

  • Not so many alternatives
  • EHR
  • PEHR
  • central vs. decentral
  • PHR…
  • cards
slide-42
SLIDE 42

One standard

Wassily Kandinsky

  • Communication first
  • Then semantics
  • Not against the market but with
  • Industry accepted
  • Get CIOs involved in standardisation
  • Gov. organizations have to help
  • Connectivity = Open source SW (OSS)
  • IHE profiles need refinement/bundling

(XDS, BPPC, XPHR, PIX…)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Legal + regulatory

43

Hans Holbein

  • Who owns cross-institutional

information?

  • Who ensures data privacy?
  • How are data privacy

violations punished?

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Organisational - Socio-psychiological

44 And who is taking care of us?

The citizen? – a heterogeneous group How to support patients/citizens best? How to involve them best? How to empower them best?

Goscinny, Uderzo

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Fra Angelico

eHealth can be a blessing or

slide-46
SLIDE 46

The European eHealth landscape?

Pieter Brueghel

a curse, it is in our hands!!!

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Claude Monet – Impression soleil levant

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Prof. Dr. B. Bergh - ZIM - UK Heidelberg