Herding in P2P Lending Market: Rational Inference or Irrational - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

herding in p2p lending market rational inference or
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Herding in P2P Lending Market: Rational Inference or Irrational - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Herding in P2P Lending Market: Rational Inference or Irrational Trust? Pei Ping, Zhang Ke Department of Finance and Insurance Business School Nanjing University 2016/5/22 1 Content Introduction Literature review Aim of study


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2016/5/22 1

Herding in P2P Lending Market: Rational Inference or Irrational Trust?

Pei Ping, Zhang Ke Department of Finance and Insurance Business School Nanjing University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2016/5/22 2

Content

 Introduction  Literature review  Aim of study  Methodology  Empirical results  Conclusion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2016/5/22 3

Introduction

 Feature of P2P lending

Massive lenders

Social aspect

Unprofessional lenders

 Advantages of analyzing herding in P2P

Controlled variable

Pre-fixed price

Discern rational herding from irrational

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2016/5/22 4

Literature review

 Definition and classification of herding

Herding is everyone doing what everyone else is doing, even when their private information suggests doing something quite different.

Rational and irrational

 Herding in P2P lending market

What we have known

What is unknown: no credit score system, first 24 hours, auto-bid

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Aim of Study

 To examine lenders’ behavior in

the circumstance of no widely accepted credit score system

the first few hours of bidding process

the condition of both auto and manual bidding

 Research question

The existence of herding

The type of herding

2016/5/22 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2016/5/22 6

Methodology

 Identify herding

bidi,t denote the number of biddings that loan i receives during its tth hour

amounti, t−1 denote the amount of prior biddings that loan i has received in its (t-1)th hour

Time varying Xi,t captures the time effects. It includes: , , ℎ

, , Day-of-Week, Start-day, Month

Time unvarying Zi captures the loan fixed effects. It includes: grade, term of loan, rate, overdue, no_paid, success bidi,t=β1bidi, t−1+β2amounti, t−1+γXi,t+δZi+μi+ei,t

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2016/5/22 7

Methodology

 Distinguish rational herding from irrational

bid_mi,t−1 denote the number of manual biddings that loan i receives during its (t-1)th hour

bid_ai,t−1 denote the number of auto biddings that loan i receives during its (t-1)th hour

amount_mi,t−1 denote the amount of prior manual biddings that loan i has received in its (t-1)th hour

amount_ai,t−1 denote the amount of prior auto biddings that loan i has received in its (t-1)th hour bid_mi,t=β1bid_mi,t−1+β2bid_ai,t−1+β3amount_mi,t−1+ β4amount_ai,t−1+γXi,t+δZi+μi+ei,t

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2016/5/22 8

Empirical results

 Data and summary statistics

We collect all the loan requests posted on Renrendai platform from October 2010 to January 2015.

The initial dataset contains 454,584 loan requests.

Then we excluded all loans without any bids, which are 334,377 loan requests.

Our final dataset therefore includes a total of 120,207 loan requests which have received 4,856,413 biddings.

It is notable that 113,718 out of 120,207 loan requests are fully funded in 24 hours after they are first posted on the platform.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Empirical results

2016/5/22 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2016/5/22 10

Empirical results

 Existence of herding

We find that the lag bid has a significant positive effect

  • n bid when the impact of percent funded on bidding is

controlled.

The herding effect is much higher after we control the time limit effect.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2016/5/22 11

Empirical results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2016/5/22 12

Empirical results

 Classification of herding

When control the effect of percent funded and time limit, we find both lag bid_m and lag bid_a have significant effect on bid_m.

It suggests that herding in P2P market consists of both rational and irrational herding.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2016/5/22 13

Empirical results

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2016/5/22 14

Empirical results

 Robustness check

Alternative definition of bidding: bidding amount instead of bidders number

GMM method to estimate dynamic formulation

VIF test for multicollinearity

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2016/5/22 15

Conclusion

 We find that lenders appear to imitate others'

behavior and herding exists in the P2P market when we control for the percent funded and time limit effect.

 Besides rational herding, there are significant

evidence that lenders would follow others' behavior blindly and ignore the information they

  • btain.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

2016/5/22 16

Future research

 Different level of disclosure on multiple P2P

lending platforms and the type of investor’s herding behavior.

 Social media, Natural Language Processing

(NLP) method and investor behavior in P2P market.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2016/5/22 17

Thanks!