Holographic Wilson Loops and Topological Insulators Andy OBannon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

holographic wilson loops and topological insulators
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Holographic Wilson Loops and Topological Insulators Andy OBannon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Holographic Wilson Loops and Topological Insulators Andy OBannon Crete Center for Theoretical Physics February 21, 2012 Credits Work in progress with: John Estes Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica Katholieke Universiteit Leuven


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Holographic Wilson Loops and Topological Insulators

Andy O’Bannon

Crete Center for Theoretical Physics February 21, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Credits

John Estes

Work in progress with:

Timm Wrase Efstratios Tsatis

Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Cornell University University of Patras

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline:

  • Motivation: Topological Insulators
  • Holographic Conformal Interfaces
  • Holographic Wilson Loops
  • Static Quark Potential
  • Future Directions
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Topological Insulators topological quantum number distinct from vacuum U(1) symmetry mass gap in charged sector

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Topological Insulators A number invariant under continuous deformations that: topological quantum number

  • Preserve all symmetries
  • Preserve the mass gap
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Topological Insulators Cannot be classified (just) by local order parameter topological quantum number

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Example: Integer QHE

slide-8
SLIDE 8

σxy = ne2 h

z B
  • xx
xy slope ~ 1 _ T 1/

hematic illustration of quantum Hall plateau t

σxx = 0

On plateaux:

topological quantum number

Z

Example: Integer QHE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Edge modes: chiral fermions

IQHE state n=1 Vacuum n=0 Observed via: Transport Directly (ARPES)

n = # of edge modes

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Effective Description

S = k 4π

  • d3x ǫµνρAµ∂νAρ

Example: Integer QHE

Ji = δS δAi = k 2π ǫijEj

quantization of quantization of k

=

σxy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

T

  • invariant Topological Insulators

d CdTe HgTe CdTe

(a)

(2+1)d (3+1)d Bi2Se3

Bi2Te3 Sb2Te3

Fu and Kane 2007 Bernevig, Hughes, Zhang 2006 König et al. 2007 Hsieh et al. 2008

slide-12
SLIDE 12

(3+1)d T

  • invariant Topological Insulators

UV: some band structure

momentum energy band gap conduction band valence band

slide-13
SLIDE 13

T : M → M ∗

M ∈ R

(3+1)d T

  • invariant Topological Insulators

IR: non-interacting electrons

  • r

M > 0 M < 0

S =

  • d4x ¯

ψ (i∂ − A − M) ψ

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Extreme IR: axion electrodynamics

θ =

  • M > 0

π M < 0

(3+1)d T

  • invariant Topological Insulators

L = 1 8π

  • ε

E2 − 1 µ

  • B2
  • +

θ 4π2 E · B

Z2 topological quantum number

mod 2π

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 0.2
  • 0.1
0.0 0.1 0.2
  • 0.2 -0.1 0.0
0.1 0.2 ky (Å )
  • 1
kx (Å )
  • 1
(b)

(3+1)d T

  • invariant Topological Insulators

θ = 0 θ = π

θ(z)

z

z = 0

Edge modes: (2+1)d Dirac fermions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ARPES

I(ω, k) ∝ f(ω)R(ω, k)

Angle Resolved Photo-Emission Spectroscopy

slide-17
SLIDE 17

(3+1)d T

  • invariant Topological Insulators
  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.0 0.1 0.2

  • 0.2 -0.1 0.0

0.1 0.2

ky (Å )

  • 1

kx (Å )

  • 1

(b)

Bi2Se3

Xia et al. 0812.2078 Hsieh et al. Nature 460, 1101

Edge modes: (2+1)d Dirac fermions

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Jumping θ-angle: image dyons

slide-19
SLIDE 19

at level of free Dirac Hamiltonians

CLASSIFICATION

  • Spatial dimension d
  • Number of species
  • Mass matrix

Choices:

slide-20
SLIDE 20

class\d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 T C S A Z Z Z Z AIII Z Z Z Z 1 AI Z 2Z Z2 Z2 + BDI Z2 Z 2Z Z2 + + 1 D Z2 Z2 Z 2Z + DIII Z2 Z2 Z 2Z − + 1 AII 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − CII 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − − 1 C 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − CI 2Z Z2 Z2 Z + − 1

Periodic Table of TI’s

Schnyder, Ryu, Furusaki, Ludwig 2008 Kitaev 2009

slide-21
SLIDE 21

class\d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 T C S A Z Z Z Z AIII Z Z Z Z 1 AI Z 2Z Z2 Z2 + BDI Z2 Z 2Z Z2 + + 1 D Z2 Z2 Z 2Z + DIII Z2 Z2 Z 2Z − + 1 AII 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − CII 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − − 1 C 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − CI 2Z Z2 Z2 Z + − 1

Integer QHE Periodic Table of TI’s

slide-22
SLIDE 22

class\d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 T C S A Z Z Z Z AIII Z Z Z Z 1 AI Z 2Z Z2 Z2 + BDI Z2 Z 2Z Z2 + + 1 D Z2 Z2 Z 2Z + DIII Z2 Z2 Z 2Z − + 1 AII 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − CII 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − − 1 C 2Z Z2 Z2 Z − CI 2Z Z2 Z2 Z + − 1

Time-reversal invariant Periodic Table of TI’s

slide-23
SLIDE 23

What can happen with

INTERACTING

electrons?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

No description in terms of non-interacting electrons Example: Fractional QHE

σxy = p q e2 h

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Interacting electrons Fractional QHE Integer QHE Non-interacting electrons T

  • Invariant TI’s
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Interacting electrons Fractional QHE Integer QHE Non-interacting electrons T

  • Invariant TI’s

Fractional T

  • Invariant TI’s?
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Similar to QCD?

Wen 1999 Maciejko, Qi, Karch, Zhang 2010, 2011

Fractionalization

Swingle, Barkeshli, McGreevy, Senthil 2010

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Fractionalization Electron Charge -1 under Singlet under

U(1)EM

G

“Statistical Gauge Fields”

U(1)EM → U(1)EM × G

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Fractionalization

Electron Baryon Fractional Electron Quark

Statistical Gauge Fields

Gluons

Similar to QCD?

= = =

Fractionalized phase Non-confining phase

=

U(1)EM × G ≃ U(1)B × SU(Nc)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

with jumping θ-angle (3+1)d Fractional T

  • invariant TI

N = 4 supersymmetric SU(Nc) Yang-Mills

Karch 2009

slide-31
SLIDE 31

GOAL

Compute the potential between test charges

N = 4 SYM with jumping θ-angle

in

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Outline:

  • Motivation: Topological Insulators
  • Holographic Conformal Interfaces
  • Holographic Wilson Loops
  • Static Quark Potential
  • Future Directions
slide-33
SLIDE 33

N = 4 SUSY SU(Nc)

(3+1)d YM

− 1 2g2 tr(DµΦiDµΦi) + 1 4g2 tr([Φi, Φj][Φi, Φj])

L = − 1 4g2 trFµνF µν + θ 32π2 ǫµνρσtrFµνFρσ

SO(4, 2) × SO(6)

λ = g2Nc

βλ = 0

slide-34
SLIDE 34

N = 4 SUSY SU(Nc)

(3+1)d YM

λ = g2Nc

Nc → ∞

fixed

− 1 2g2 tr(DµΦiDµΦi) + 1 4g2 tr([Φi, Φj][Φi, Φj])

L = − 1 4g2 trFµνF µν + θ 32π2 ǫµνρσtrFµνFρσ

slide-35
SLIDE 35

=

SO(4, 2) × SO(6)

=

N = 4 SYM

Nc, λ ≫ 1

IIB SUGRA

AdS5 × S5

global symmetry

isometry

slide-36
SLIDE 36

“holographic”

r = ∞

r = 0

boundary

ds2 = dr2 r2 + r2 −dt2 + dx2 + dy2 + dz2

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The Janus Solution

Bak, Gutperle, Hirano 2003

Solution of type IIB SUGRA

ds2 = R2 γ−1h(x)2dx2 + h(x)ds2

AdS4 + ds2 S5

  • ,

h(x) = γ

  • 1 +

4γ − 3 ℘(x) + 1 − 2γ

  • φ(x) = φ0 +
  • 6(1 − γ)
  • x + 4γ − 3

℘(χ)

  • ln σ(x + χ)

σ(x − χ) − 2ζ(χ)x

  • ,

(and the five-form)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The Janus Solution

ds2 = R2 γ−1h(x)2dx2 + h(x)ds2

AdS4 + ds2 S5

  • ,

h(x) = γ

  • 1 +

4γ − 3 ℘(x) + 1 − 2γ

  • φ(x) = φ0 +
  • 6(1 − γ)
  • x + 4γ − 3

℘(χ)

  • ln σ(x + χ)

σ(x − χ) − 2ζ(χ)x

  • ,

(and the five-form)

One-parameter dilatonic deformation of AdS5 × S5

slide-39
SLIDE 39

AdS4 slicing of AdS5

h(x) = 1 1 − x2

ds2 = R2 h(x)2dx2 + h(x)ds2

AdS4 + ds2 S5

  • x ∈ (−1, 1)

isometry manifest

SO(3, 2) × SO(6)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

z < 0 z = 0 z > 0

AdS4 slicing of AdS5

slide-41
SLIDE 41

z < 0 z = 0 z > 0

x

AdS4

  • AdS4 slicing of AdS5
slide-42
SLIDE 42

The Janus Solution

ds2 = R2 γ−1h(x)2dx2 + h(x)ds2

AdS4 + ds2 S5

  • ,

h(x) = γ

  • 1 +

4γ − 3 ℘(x) + 1 − 2γ

  • φ(x) = φ0 +
  • 6(1 − γ)
  • x + 4γ − 3

℘(χ)

  • ln σ(x + χ)

σ(x − χ) − 2ζ(χ)x

  • ,

(and the five-form)

One-parameter dilatonic deformation of AdS5 × S5

slide-43
SLIDE 43

The Janus Solution

ds2 = R2 γ−1h(x)2dx2 + h(x)ds2

AdS4 + ds2 S5

  • ,

h(x) = γ

  • 1 +

4γ − 3 ℘(x) + 1 − 2γ

  • φ(x) = φ0 +
  • 6(1 − γ)
  • x + 4γ − 3

℘(χ)

  • ln σ(x + χ)

σ(x − χ) − 2ζ(χ)x

  • ,

(and the five-form)

Isometry SO(3, 2) × SO(6)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

The Janus Solution

ds2 = R2 γ−1h(x)2dx2 + h(x)ds2

AdS4 + ds2 S5

  • ,

h(x) = γ

  • 1 +

4γ − 3 ℘(x) + 1 − 2γ

  • φ(x) = φ0 +
  • 6(1 − γ)
  • x + 4γ − 3

℘(χ)

  • ln σ(x + χ)

σ(x − χ) − 2ζ(χ)x

  • ,

(and the five-form)

One free parameter

γ ∈ (3/4, 1)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The Janus Solution

ds2 = R2 γ−1h(x)2dx2 + h(x)ds2

AdS4 + ds2 S5

  • ,

h(x) = γ

  • 1 +

4γ − 3 ℘(x) + 1 − 2γ

  • φ(x) = φ0 +
  • 6(1 − γ)
  • x + 4γ − 3

℘(χ)

  • ln σ(x + χ)

σ(x − χ) − 2ζ(χ)x

  • ,

(and the five-form)

Breaks ALL SUSY

slide-46
SLIDE 46

e2φ−

e2φ+

The Janus Solution Free parameter: jump in dilaton

“r = ∞”

“r = 0”

x

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Roman god of beginnings, transitions, gates, and doorways Towards Past Towards Future Janus

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Root of “January” and “Janitor” Towards Past Towards Future Janus

slide-49
SLIDE 49

− 1 2g2 tr(DµΦiDµΦi) + 1 4g2 tr([Φi, Φj][Φi, Φj])

L = − 1 4g2 trFµνF µν + θ 32π2 ǫµνρσtrFµνFρσ

g−

g+

z

z = 0

g(z)

e2φ = g2/2π

slide-50
SLIDE 50

− 1 2g2 tr(DµΦiDµΦi) + 1 4g2 tr([Φi, Φj][Φi, Φj])

L = − 1 4g2 trFµνF µν + θ 32π2 ǫµνρσtrFµνFρσ

g−

g+

z

z = 0

g(z)

Jumping coupling

slide-51
SLIDE 51

− 1 2g2 tr(DµΦiDµΦi) + 1 4g2 tr([Φi, Φj][Φi, Φj])

L = − 1 4g2 trFµνF µν + θ 32π2 ǫµνρσtrFµνFρσ

Jumping coupling Preserves SO(3,2) x SO(6) Breaks all SUSY

“Conformal Interface”

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Dielectric Interfaces

Image charges!

L = 1 8π

  • ε

E2 − 1 µ

  • B2
  • ε ∝ 1/g2
slide-53
SLIDE 53

Jumping dilaton Jumping axion

τ → aτ + b cτ + d

ab − cd = 1

a, b, c, d ∈ R

τ = C0 + ie−2φ

SL(2, R)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Jumping coupling

Topological Insulator

Jumping θ-angle

τ → aτ + b cτ + d

ab − cd = 1

a, b, c, d ∈ R

τ = θ 2π + i2π g2

SL(2, R)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Outline:

  • Motivation: Topological Insulators
  • Holographic Conformal Interfaces
  • Holographic Wilson Loops
  • Static Quark Potential
  • Future Directions
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

R = Nc

SU(Nc)

  • f

T

WR[C] = 1 Nc trRP exp

  • C

ds

  • iAµ ˙

xµ + Φiθi| ˙ x|

  • C =
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

R = Nc

SU(Nc)

  • f

T

L

WR[C] = 1 Nc trRP exp

  • C

ds

  • iAµ ˙

xµ + Φiθi| ˙ x|

  • C =
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

WR[C] = 1 Nc trRP exp

  • C

ds

  • iAµ ˙

xµ + Φiθi| ˙ x|

  • V (L) = f(λ)

L

V (L) = − lim

T →∞

1 T lnW[C]

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM Perturbatively

λ ≪ 1

− | ˙ x(s)|| ˙ x(˜ s)|θiθjPΦi(x(s))Φj(x(˜ s))

  • + . . .

W[C] = 1 − Nc 2

  • C

ds

  • C

d˜ s ( ˙ xµ(s) ˙ xν(˜ s)PAµ(x(s))Aν(x(s))

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM Sum “ladder” diagrams

  • 1 +

+ + · · ·

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM Holographically

λ ≫ 1

b.

r = ∞

r = 0

C

Maldacena Rey and Yee 1998

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

V (L) = − lim

T →∞

1 T lnW[C] = lim

T →∞

A T

SNG|solution = A

W[C] ∝ e−A

SNG = − 1 2πα′

  • d2σ
  • −det g
slide-63
SLIDE 63

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

SNG|solution

diverges at

r = ∞

Infinite self-energy

b.

C

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM Legendre transform

Drukker, Gross, Ooguri 1999

A = SNG −

  • dσ Pr r
  • ∂AdS
slide-65
SLIDE 65

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

“Straight string” Legendre transform cancels the divergence!

A = 0

W[C] = 1

due to SUSY

slide-66
SLIDE 66

N = 4 SYM jumping g

Subtracting straight string Subtracting self-energy

=

b.

C

Wilson Loops from AdS5

Legendre transform =

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Holography Ladder Diagrams

V (L) =      − 1

4π 2λ L ,

λ ≪ 1 − 1

π √ 2λ L ,

λ ≫ 1.

λ ≫ 1

Maldacena Rey and Yee 1998 Erickson Semenoff Zarembo 2000

V (L) = − 4π2 Γ (1/4)4 √ 2λ L

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Conformal Interface Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

X 3

L D

X 3 X X 3 3 right left

z z

zright

zleft

slide-69
SLIDE 69

V (L, D) = f(λ, D/L) L

X 3

L D

z

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Conformal Interface Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

PAµ(x(s))Aν(x(s)) acquires image terms

PΦi(x(s))Φj(x(˜ s)

unchanged

Clark, Freedman, Karch, Schnabl 2004

Perturbatively

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM

  • 1
1 2 3 4 5
  • 4
  • 2
2 4

Holographically

Conformal Interface

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Outline:

  • Motivation: Topological Insulators
  • Holographic Conformal Interfaces
  • Holographic Wilson Loops
  • Static Quark Potential
  • Future Directions
slide-73
SLIDE 73

gI

gII

˜ Q

˜ Q = Qg2

II − g2 I

g2

II + g2 I

Q

Electromagnetism

−z

+z

slide-74
SLIDE 74

gI

gII

attracted to side with SMALLER coupling

Q

˜ Q

Q

Electromagnetism

−z

+z

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Electromagnetism

V g2

I/4π

g2

I > g2 II

Q = +1

g2

II

g2

I

z

slide-76
SLIDE 76

gI

gII

W[C]

C

with straight-line

˜ Q

Q

−z

+z

N = 4 SYM jumping g

slide-77
SLIDE 77

N = 4 SYM jumping g

A = 0

(!)

Straight string in Janus

A = SNG −

  • dσ Pr r
  • ∂AdS

V = lim

T →∞

A T = 0

Interaction energy with image charge

slide-78
SLIDE 78

N = 4 SYM jumping g

z

g2 e2g2

V

  • 2√λIλII
slide-79
SLIDE 79

gI

gII

˜ Q = Qg2

II − g2 I

g2

II + g2 I

Q1 = +1

Q2 = −1

˜ Q1

˜ Q2

D D

L

Electromagnetism

−z

+z

slide-80
SLIDE 80

gI

gII

Q1 = +1

Q2 = −1

˜ Q1

˜ Q2

D D

L

Electromagnetism

−z

+z

V = g2

I

  • Q1Q2

L + Q1 ˜ Q1 2D + Q2 ˜ Q2 2D + Q1 ˜ Q2 √ L2 + 4D2

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Electromagnetism

gI

gII

Q1 = +1

Q2 = −1

˜ Q1

˜ Q2

D D

L

Again attracted to side with SMALLER coupling

−z

+z

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Electromagnetism

2 1 1 2 5 3 1 1 3

g2

II = 1

2g2

I

g2

I

V L g2

I/4π

z L

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Electromagnetism

V L g2

I/4π − (images)

10 5 5 10 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0

g2

II = 1

2g2

I

g2

I

z L

slide-84
SLIDE 84

gI

gII

Q1 = +1

Q2 = −1

˜ Q1

˜ Q2

D D

L

−z

+z

N = 4 SYM jumping g

W[C]

C

with rectangular

slide-85
SLIDE 85

N = 4 SYM jumping g

g2 e2g2

z L

V L

  • 2√λIλII
4 2 2 4 5 5
slide-86
SLIDE 86

N = 4 SYM jumping g

4 2 2 4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0

g2 e2g2

z L

V L

  • 2√λIλII

− (images)

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Q

Electromagnetism

θII

θI

( ˜ Qe, ˜ Qm)

˜ Qe = −Q g4 (θII − θI)2 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2 ˜ Qm = −4πQ g2(θII − θI) 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2

−z

+z

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Q

Electromagnetism

( ˜ Qe, ˜ Qm)

˜ Qe = −Q g4 (θII − θI)2 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2 ˜ Qm = −4πQ g2(θII − θI) 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2

θII

θI

−z

+z

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Q

Electromagnetism

( ˜ Qe, ˜ Qm)

Interface always attractive!

θII

θI

−z

+z

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Electromagnetism

z

V g2/4π

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Q

θII

θI

( ˜ Qe, ˜ Qm)

˜ Qe = −Q g4 (θII − θI)2 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2 ˜ Qm = −4πQ g2(θII − θI) 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

−z

+z

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Q

θII

θI

( ˜ Qe, ˜ Qm)

˜ Qe = −Q g4 (θII − θI)2 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2 ˜ Qm = −4πQ g2(θII − θI) 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

−z

+z

slide-93
SLIDE 93

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

z

V √ 2λ/2π

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Electromagnetism

Interface always attractive!

θII

θI

Q1 = +1

Q2 = −1

D D

L

( ˜ Qe

1, ˜

Qm

1 )

( ˜ Qe

2, ˜

Qm

2 )

−z

+z

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Electromagnetism

1 0.5 0.5 1 30 20 10

V L g2/4π

z L

g2∆θ = 102

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Electromagnetism

z L

V L g2/4π − (images)

15 10 5 5 10 15 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2

g2∆θ = 102

slide-97
SLIDE 97

θII

θI

Q1 = +1

Q2 = −1

D D

L

( ˜ Qe

1, ˜

Qm

1 )

( ˜ Qe

2, ˜

Qm

2 )

˜ Qe = −Q g4 (θII − θI)2 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2 ˜ Qm = −4πQ g2(θII − θI) 16π2 + g4 (θII − θI)2

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

−z

+z

slide-98
SLIDE 98

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

z L

θ = 0

V L √ 2λ

4 2 2 4 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.45

θ = π

slide-99
SLIDE 99

θ = 0

θ = π

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

4 2 2 4 1.430 1.425 1.420 1.415 1.410 1.405

z L

V L √ 2λ/2π − (images)

slide-100
SLIDE 100

θ = 0

θ = π

0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.4068 1.4066 1.4064 1.4062 1.4060 1.4058 1.4056

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

z L

V L √ 2λ/2π − (images)

slide-101
SLIDE 101 3 2 1 1 2 3 1.438 1.436 1.434 1.432 1.430
  • 0.2
0.1 0.1 0.2 1.43326 1.43324 1.43322 1.43320 1.43318 2 1 1 2 3 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
  • 0.15 0.10 0.05
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.518 0.516 0.514
  • ∆θ = π/5

∆θ = 20π

N = 4 SYM jumping θ

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Outline:

  • Motivation: Topological Insulators
  • Holographic Conformal Interfaces
  • Holographic Wilson Loops
  • Static Quark Potential
  • Future Directions
slide-103
SLIDE 103

Future Directions

  • Circular Wilson loops?
  • Other representations?
  • Image strings?
  • Accelerating charges?
slide-104
SLIDE 104

Thank You.