HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY THE DUTY OF THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT OUGHT TO - - PDF document

hope is not a strategy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY THE DUTY OF THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT OUGHT TO - - PDF document

1887 I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE POWER AND HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY THE DUTY OF THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT OUGHT TO BE EXTENDED TO THE RELIEF OF INDIVIDUAL SUFFERING. Richard E Ya Deau M.D. FACS, FACHE (HON) FEDERAL AID IN SUCH CASES


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY

Richard E Ya Deau M.D. FACS, FACHE (HON)

1887

“I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE POWER AND THE DUTY OF THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT OUGHT TO BE EXTENDED TO THE RELIEF OF INDIVIDUAL SUFFERING.” “FEDERAL AID IN SUCH CASES ENCOURAGES THE EXPECTATION OF PATERNAL CARE ON THE PART OF THE GOVERNMENT AND WEAKENS THE STURDINESS OF OUR NATIONAL CHARACTER.”

Grover Cleveland, Democrat, President of the United States

1894

He dispatched troops to settle a nationwide railroad strike at the request of J. P. Morgan. Many died and some were hung. Grover Cleveland, Democratic President

1937

“THE TEST OF OUR PROGRESS IS NOT WHETHER WE ADD MORE TO THE ABUNDANCE OF THOSE WHO HAVE MUCH; IT IS WHETHER WE PROVIDE ENOUGH FOR THOSE WHO HAVE TOO LITTLE.” Franklin D. Roosevelt, Democrat, President of the United States

HOPE

 Some hope that healthcare reform will be

  • verthrown by the courts.

 Others hope that healthcare reform will be

implemented in toto to acclaimed success.

 Neither “hope” addresses the issues of healthcare

delivery within our communities.

 Both alternatives insure that there is little change

in the structure and responsibilities within healthcare, i.e. the “Status Quo” is preserved.

HOPE VS. ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT

The alternatives to hope, good expectations, and waiting to see how this all plays out are:

 Learning from the successes of others who have

faced these issues of cost, quality and delivery.

 Analyzing the failures of expectant care, i.e.

hoping that everything works for the good while we do nothing.

 Replacing “doing what we always have done”

with a major redesign of all our roles, relationships, and responsibilities.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

THE MONETIZATION OF HEALTH CARE

Whom do we serve? Our patients and their needs,

  • r

The financial legerdemain that now occupies our time and attention. Note: these are “God or Mammon” alternatives.

THE MONETIZATION OF HEALTH CARE

Arizona, 2010 - 2011: With a faltering budget, Arizona took monies from the “transplant fund” while adding additional funding for border security. This left 97 people who were in the queue for transplants without any funding. Then one by one they started dying, chronicled on the front pages of the Phoenix paper.

THE MONETIZATION OF HEALTH CARE

Pennsylvania 2011:

 Facing a $4 billion budget shortfall, the state

summarily disenrolled 41,476 citizens from the its “Adult Basic” insurance program.

 The program was created by Gov. Tom Ridge (R)

to cover those earning too much for Medicaid but too little to afford private insurance.

 Another 505,000 working citizens were on the

waiting list for enrollment.

THE MONETIZATION OF HEALTH CARE

Pennsylvania 2011:

 Blue Cross/Blue Shield plans run substantial

surpluses, rising to a cumulative 5.6 billion in

  • 2009. The 4 BC/BS plans had agreed to

contribute to the “Adult Basic” plan as their tax- exempt organization’s “charitable obligation.”

 BC/BS allowed their agreements with the state to

expire Dec. 31, 2010. Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center

THE MONETIZATION OF HEALTH CARE

Washington State 2010: The state-financed plan for the working poor disenrolled 17,500 members.

THE MONETIZATION OF HEALTH CARE

“Abandoned Babies”

 Of the 33 “advanced economies,” the United

States has the highest infant mortality rate. This is principally related to the incidence of premature babies.

 In Feb. 2011 the House of Representatives cut

$50 million from the federal budget intended to support state-based prenatal care programs.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE MONETIZATION OF HEALTH CARE

“Abandoned Babies”

 This budget also cut Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention nearly $1 billion, which was, in some part, for preventive health programs including preterm birth studies. {Note: Premature births cost the country at least $26 billion a year. Every 10% reduction in the number of premature births, in addition to saving thousands of babies, would save $2.6 billion.}

ARE THERE ANY ANSWERS?

“Massachusetts”

  • Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts told the

House Energy and Commerce Committee he was “indifferent” to the federal proposals to address Medicaid, as his state had already

  • verhauled its health care system so that 98%
  • f its residents now have health insurance.

ARE THERE ANY ANSWERS?

The Oregon Medicaid study looked at 30,000 covered enrollees against the experience of 45,000 not covered. When evaluated against the control group these enrollees were provided significantly more care - including preventive medicine, had lower hospital admissions, and their financial situation improved.

Amy Finkelstein, MIT economics professor National Bureau of Economic Research

ARE THERE ANY ANSWERS?

 Reduce the 23.5% of people readmitted from

post-acute-care skilled-nursing facilities.

 Reduce unnecessary hospitalizations of nursing

home residents. {Nursing homes have a financial incentive to hospitalize residents on Medicaid: a three day hospitalization may qualify them for Medicare part A payments at 3-4 times the Medicaid rate.}

Joseph G. Ouslander, M.D. NEJM 365;13 1165-66, September 29, 2011

ARE THERE ANY ANSWERS?

Diagnose Alzheimer’s disease early Earlier cognitive function testing enables:

 Preparing families to cope with AD.  Insuring that the patient, while still competent, has a

voice in future medical decisions.

 Learning to manage memory loss & behavioral

change, thereby decreasing or delaying hospitalization.

 Avoiding acute care strategies for a chronic disease.

You can minimize the chaotic and tragic things that can happen if everybody involved understands Alzheimer’s disease and knows what to do.

Susan Okie, M.D. Georgetown University School of Medicine NEJM 365;12 1169-70, September 22, 2011

ARE THERE ANY ANSWERS?

Diffuse best practices more effectively.

 There are a selection of individual physicians and

health care organizations that deliver care at a cost 20% lower than average.

 If the rest of the industry followed their example,

health care spending would drop from 17% GDP to 13% GDP, leaving $640 billion available to address other public and private sector needs!

The $640 Billion Question-Why Does Cost-effective Care Diffuse So Slowly? Victor Fuchs, PhD, Stanford University NEJM 364;21 1985-96, May 26, 2011

slide-4
SLIDE 4

YOU DON’T HAVE TO HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS Hospice has long used self-help groups to assist families with their mutual needs as well as to provide emotional support, relieve isolation, and build a “community” of like people. These support systems are not widely integrated into the health-care community. Many support groups arise, driven by patient advocacy, from sources other than the local healthcare delivery systems. YOU DON’T HAVE TO HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS Patients are turning to the internet site www.PatientsLikeMe.com.

 110,000 patients communicate with each other daily.  They represent over 1,000 serious diseases.  Well resourced families, with access to world class

personal physicians and scientists, are passionately engaged with each other.

 This site is managed for content integrity and a

balance between patient, clinical and research perspectives by Paul Wicks* PhD.

*MIT’s “Humanitarian of the Year award” for 2011

GOOD AND EVIL

Each of you, in fact virtually every member of society, has a story of the disappointments, failures and perceived evils within the healthcare system. All too often these stories obscure your great works, successes and advancements in therapeutic practice.

GOOD AND EVIL

To deal with evil, real or perceived, you must replace it with good

 institutions,  programs,  personnel, and  support systems

Providing exceptional care, all of the time, for all of the people in an affordable environment.

We will not be punished for our profligate behavior. We will be punished by our profligate behavior.

END NOTE

“Physicians are the most influential element in health care. The public’s trust in them makes physicians the only plausible catalyst of policies to accelerate the diffusion of cost-effective care. Are U.S. physicians sufficiently visionary, public- minded, and well led to respond to this national fiscal and ethical imperative?”

The $640 Billion Question-Why Does Cost-effective Care Diffuse So Slowly? Victor Fuchs, PhD, Stanford University NEJM 364;21 1985-96, May 26, 2011

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Move from HOPE to Owning the Problem

Decrease Costs Increase Quality Provide Better Outcomes.