How Technology Changes Our Universities University of British - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how technology changes our universities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How Technology Changes Our Universities University of British - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TNC-CUC 2003 How Technology Changes Our Universities University of British Columbia 1 Overview 75 universities worldwide strategies for e-learning what is happening? what is changing? what needs to be done?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

University of British Columbia 1

TNC-CUC 2003

How Technology Changes Our Universities

slide-2
SLIDE 2

University of British Columbia 2

Overview

  • 75 universities worldwide
  • strategies for e-learning
  • what is happening?
  • what is changing?
  • what needs to be done?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

University of British Columbia 3

Why use technology?

  • increase access/market share
  • improve quality of learning
  • higher level skills
  • knowledge/skills for knowledge-based

society

  • save/make money
slide-4
SLIDE 4

University of British Columbia 4

Technology and flexible learning

Class-

room aids Distributed learning Face-to- face teaching Face-to- face + e-learning (mixed mode) Distance education No e-learning Fully e-learning

slide-5
SLIDE 5

University of British Columbia 5

Change depends on use

  • classroom aids
  • add-on
  • increases cost
  • distributed learning
  • replaces something
  • changes what we do
slide-6
SLIDE 6

University of British Columbia 6

Technology and choice

  • increases flexibility
  • brings new resources
  • facilitates skills development
  • offers more choice
  • so: what do we want to do?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

University of British Columbia 7

Vision

  • UBC: traditional public research

university (35,000 students)

  • how do we want to teach?
  • faculty workshops
  • scenarios
  • summary video
slide-8
SLIDE 8

University of British Columbia 8

Vision: mandate

  • academic plan/strategic goals:
  • learner-centred
  • research teaching
  • problem/inq

uiry based

  • collaborative
  • community linked
slide-9
SLIDE 9

University of British Columbia 9

Vision: mandate

  • lifelong learning
  • assume large classes
  • exploit existing campus
  • use ‘

known’ technology (exists or coming)

  • realistic re costs
slide-10
SLIDE 10

University of British Columbia 10

Teaching with technology

  • A

vision for teaching with technology

slide-11
SLIDE 11

University of British Columbia 11

So what?

  • technology under-exploited
  • need to think strategically:
  • new markets: lifelong learning
  • new learning outcomes: PBL
  • improve q

uality: Pew

  • re-organise to support e-learning
slide-12
SLIDE 12

University of British Columbia 12

Models of course design

  • Lone Ranger
  • boutiq

ue

  • collegial materials development
  • project management
slide-13
SLIDE 13

University of British Columbia 13

Laissez-faire planning: “Lone Rangers”

  • main model everywhere
  • early adopters
  • essential for change
  • dedicated
  • no alternative
slide-14
SLIDE 14

University of British Columbia 14

Lone Rangers

  • often never
‘ finished ’
  • many mista
k es , lengthy production
  • poor interface
/ graphics
  • limited use: lost revenues
  • put off other professors
slide-15
SLIDE 15

University of British Columbia 1

5 T he diffusion of innovation

% of adopters Resistance to adoption

( from Rogers, 1995 )

a b c d

slide-16
SLIDE 16

University of British Columbia 1

6 P ro j ect management
  • establish pro
j ects
  • wor
k in a team
  • sub
j ect e x pert + course developer +

web designer

  • schedules
/ budgets / courses
  • funding lin
k ed to P M
slide-17
SLIDE 17

University of British Columbia 1

7

Lone Rangers vs project management

Continuum class- room aids distributed learning multi- media technical help less more change in methods

distance

education

slide-18
SLIDE 18

University of British Columbia 1

8 P eople infrastructure
  • technical:
  • networ
k s / hardware
  • production:
  • interface designers
  • graphics designers
  • instructional
/ management
slide-19
SLIDE 19

University of British Columbia 1

9 T he cycle of online development
  • 1. Lone rangers
  • 2 . Central pro
j ect grants
  • 3. Rapid unco-ordinated e
x pansion
  • 4. Focus
/ policies / funding
  • 5 . Q uality and sustainability
slide-20
SLIDE 20

University of British Columbia

2

Issues: high activity

, low importance
  • networ
k s + terminals
  • wireless
  • computer labs
/ learning commons
  • learning ob
j ects
  • W eb streaming
slide-21
SLIDE 21

University of British Columbia

2 1

Issues: low activity

, high importance

strategy for e-learning

quality teaching cost- effectiveness priorities funding policies learner support goals

slide-22
SLIDE 22

University of British Columbia

2 2

Q uality teaching and learning

  • outcomes-based
  • s
k ills for k nowledge-based society , e.g.
  • critical thin
k ing
  • problem-based learning
  • q uality assurance process
slide-23
SLIDE 23

University of British Columbia

2 3

Cost-effectiveness and

q uality assurance
  • high
q uality learning at reasonable cost
  • planning: strategic goals
  • mar
k et research
  • pro
j ect management
  • instructional design
  • accurate budgeting
slide-24
SLIDE 24

University of British Columbia

2 4

Integrating teaching

/ admin
  • bac
k -end to student admin systems
  • class lists
/ grades / e-mail addresses
  • portals
  • ‘ push
’ to students
  • customisable
slide-25
SLIDE 25

University of British Columbia

2 5

Integrated E-strategy

  • student recruitment
/ mar k eting / fund-

raising

  • admission
/ registration / materials

handling

  • courses + student record
  • portals
( user focused )
  • needs
‘ middleware ’ / strategy
slide-26
SLIDE 26

University of British Columbia

2 6

W ill universities change

?
  • S ome have:
  • O pen University of Catalonia
  • T ec de
M
  • nterrey
  • University of Central Florida
  • University of
S outh A ustralia
slide-27
SLIDE 27

University of British Columbia

2 7

W ill universities change

?
  • M
  • st won
’ t , because:
  • 1. Research is
k ing
  • 2 . No incentives
  • 3.
S enior administrators lac k k nowledge / s k ills
  • 4. Necessary changes disruptive
slide-28
SLIDE 28

University of British Columbia

2 8

Conclusions

  • role of professors must change
  • pedagogy + organization the issues
  • not ready yet: still new
  • change will be slow: but necessary
slide-29
SLIDE 29

University of British Columbia

2 9

Further information

  • www.learningtechnologies. ubc.ca
  • http:
/ / bates.cstudies.ubc.ca
  • Bates
, A ( 2 ) ‘ M A N A G ING T ECHNO LO G IC A L CH A NG E ’ S an

Francisco: Jossey Bass

  • tony.bates@ubc.ca