Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy in heavy-ion physics B alint Kurgyis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hydrodynamics and femtoscopy in heavy ion physics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy in heavy-ion physics B alint Kurgyis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy in heavy-ion physics B alint Kurgyis E otv os University, Budapest Bolyai Physics Seminar Budapest, 20 February 2019 Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Big


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy in heavy-ion physics

B´ alint Kurgyis

  • tv¨
  • s University, Budapest

Bolyai Physics Seminar Budapest, 20 February 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary

Big bang in the laboratory - heavy-ion collisions

Timeline of the Universe Galaxies Atoms Nuclei Elementary particles How should we investigate? Reproduce in the laboratory! Create “little bangs” → Heavy-ion collisions Detect the created particles → Study the sQGP

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 3 / 38

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary

The strongly interacting quark-gluon plasma (sQGP)

Discovered at the RHIC, created at LHC Hot, expanding, perfect quark-fluid Hadrons created at the freeze-out Photons and leptons ”shine through”

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 4 / 38

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Equations of non-relativistic hydrodynamics

Looking for (u, p, ρ) fields Assumptions: zero viscosity zero heat conductivity Euler-equation

∂u ∂t + (u∇)u = − 1 ρ∇p

Continuity equation

∂ρ ∂t + ∇(ρu) = 0

Equation of state p − ρ relation

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 6 / 38

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Perturbative equations

Perturbed fields u → u + δu p → p + δp ρ → ρ + δρ Perturbed equations first order perturbation using another solution

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 7 / 38

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Wave solution

Known solution: Standing fluid u = 0 p = const. ρ = const. Sound speed from equation of state: ∂p ∂ρ = c2 Perturbed Euler-equation

∂δu ∂t = − 1 ρ∇δp

Perturbed continuity equation

∂δρ ∂t + ρ∇δu = 0

Wave solution for pressure

∂2δp ∂t2 = c2∆δp

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 8 / 38

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Equations for relativistic hydrodynamics

Looking for (uµ, p, ǫ, n or σ) fields Assumptions: zero viscosity zero heat-conductivity local energy-momentum conservation Properties: uµuµ = 1 gµν = diag(1, −1, −1, −1) Temperature: T = (ǫ + p)/σ Locally conserved entropy density n → conserved charge density Energy, momentum conservation ∂µT µν = 0 T µν = (ǫ + p)uµuν − pgµν Continuity equation ∂µ(nuµ) = 0 or ∂µ(σuµ) = 0 Equation of state (EoS) ǫ = κp

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 9 / 38

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Known solutions for relativistic hydrodynamics

Many numerical solutions Exact, analytic solutions important: connect initial/final state Famous 1+1D solutions: Landau-Khalatnikov & Hwa-Bjorken

  • L. D. Landau, Izv. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 17, 51 (1953)

I.M. Khalatnikov, Zhur. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 27, 529 (1954)

  • R. C. Hwa, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2260 (1974)
  • J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140 (1983)

Discovery of sQGP → Many new solutions First truly 3D relativistic solution: Hubble-flow

Cs¨

  • rg˝
  • , Csernai, Hama, Kodama, Heavy Ion Phys. A21, 73 (2004), nucl-th/0306004

Describes well experimental data

Csan´ ad, Vargyas, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 473 (2010) nucl-th/09094842

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 10 / 38

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Perturbative handling of the relativistic hydrodynamics

Perturbed fields: Start from a known solution: (uµ, p, n) uµ → uµ + δuµ p → p + δp n → n + δn works similarly for n → σ Orthogonality: uµδuµ = 0 (1) Equations for perturbations: substitute perturbations into equations substract 0th order equations neglect 2nd or higher order perturbations remainder: perturbed equation solution yields perturbations δuµ, δn, δp

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 11 / 38

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Known solution: Hubble-flow

Hubble-flow:

Cs¨

  • rg˝
  • , Csernai, Hama, Kodama , Heavy Ion Phys. A21, 73 (2004), nucl-th/0306004

uµ = xµ

τ

n = n0 τ0

τ

3 N(S) p = p0 τ0

τ

3+ 3

κ

Scaling variable: uµ∂µS = ∂τS = 0 Describes well hadronic data and photons

Csan´ ad, Vargyas, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 473 (2010) nucl-th/09094842 Csan´ ad, M´ ajer, Central Eur. J. Phys. 10 (2012)

Multipole solutions also possible

Csan´ ad, Szab´

  • , Phys. Rev. C 90, 054911 (2014)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 12 / 38

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Finding solutions for perturbations

The way of solution: Choosing test functions: δp, δuµ, δn Fixing arbitrary functions Choosing scaling variable S Satisfying all the restrictions instead, one could look for sound waves on top of Hubble-flow

  • S. Shi, J. Liao, P. Zhuang Phys.Rev. C90 no.6, 064912 (2014) arXiv:1405.4546

Perturbations: uµ = xµ τ →δuµ = δ · F(τ)g(xν)∂µS · χ(S) (2) n = n0 τ0 τ 3 N(S) →δn = δ · n0 τ0 τ 3 h(xν)ν(S) (3) p = p0 τ0 τ 3+ 3

κ

→δp = δ · p0π(S) τ0 τ 3+ 3

κ

(4)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 13 / 38

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

General form of solutions

Perturbations: δuµ = δ · F(τ)g(xν)∂µS · χ(S) (5) δp = δ · p0π(S) τ0 τ 3+ 3

κ

(6) δn = δ · n0 τ0 τ 3 h(xν)ν(S) (7)

δuµ → defined by g(xν) χ(S) and F(τ) fixed by g(xν) δp → π(S) determined by δuµ δn → ν(S) fixed by h(xν) g(xν), h(xν), S need to fullfill (8)-(10)

Equations for N(S), χ(S), ν(S), π(S), h(xµ), g(xµ), S functions χ′(S) χ(S) = − ∂µ∂µS ∂µS∂µS − ∂µS∂µ ln g(xν) ∂µS∂µS (8) π′(S) χ(S) = (κ + 1)

  • F(τ)
  • uµ∂µg(xν) − 3g(xν)

κτ

  • + F ′(τ)g(xν)
  • (9)

ν(S) χ(S)N ′(S) = −F(τ)g(xν)∂µS∂µS uµ∂µh(xν) (10)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 14 / 38

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Looking for concrete solution

To compute measurables → fix the g(xν), F(τ), h(xν) functions: g(xν) = 1, F(τ) = τ + cτ0 τ τ0 3

κ

h(xν) =    ln

  • τ

τ0

  • + c

κ 3−κ

  • τ

τ0

3

κ −1

if κ = 3 (1 + c) ln

  • τ

τ0

  • if κ = 3

Restrictions: uµ∂µS = 0

∂µ∂µS ∂µS∂µS is a function of the scaling variable

τ 2∂µS∂µS also a function of the scaling variable Scaling variables found so far: S = rm

tm ,

S = rm

τ m ,

S = τ m

tm

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 15 / 38

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Scaling variable: S = r m/tm

Scaling variable S = rm tm (11) The functions of the scaling variable: Perturbations

δp = δ · p0 τ0

τ

3+ 3

κ π(S)

δuµ = δ ·

  • τ + cτ0
  • τ

τ0

3

κ

∂µSχ(S) δn = δ · n0 τ0

τ

3

  • ln
  • τ

τ0

  • + c

κ 3−κ

  • τ

τ0

3

κ −1

ν(S)

χ(S) = r t −m−1 (12) π(S) = −(κ + 1)(κ − 3) κ m r t −1 (13) ν(S) = m2 r t m−1 r t 2 − 1 1 − r t −2 N ′ rm tm

  • (14)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 16 / 38

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Concrete solution with S = t/r, N(S) = exp(−S−2)

Particular case: m = −1 S = t r (15)

Let us choose Gaussian N(S): N(S) = e− r2

t2 = e−S−2

The functions of the scaling variable: χ(S) = 1 (16) π(S) = (κ + 1)(κ − 3) κ t r

  • (17)

ν(S) = 2 t r −3 1 − t r 22 N t r

  • (18)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 17 / 38

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Four-velocity perturbation

δuµ = δ ·

  • τ + cτ0
  • τ

τ0

3

κ

∂µS uµ = xµ

τ

Used parameters (describes v2, N(pT), RHBT):

  • M. Csan´

ad, M. Vargyas, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 473

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 ux+δux x [fm] δ=0 δ=0.001, c=-3 τ=6 fm/c 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 (ux+δux)/ux x [fm] δ=0 δ=0.001, c=-3 δ=0.001, c=2, δ=0.0005, c=-3 δ=0.0005, c=2 τ=6 fm/c

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 18 / 38

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Pressure perturbation

δp = δ · p0 τ0

τ

3+ 3

κ (κ+1)(κ−3)

κ

S p = p0 τ0

τ

3+ 3

κ 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 p+δp x [fm] δ=0 δ=0.001 τ=6 fm/c 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 (p+δp)/p x [fm] δ=0 δ=0.01 δ=0.005 δ=0.001 δ=0.0005 τ=6 fm/c

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 19 / 38

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Particle density perturbation

δn = δ · 2bn0 τ0

τ

3

  • ln
  • τ

τ0

  • + c

κ 3−κ

  • τ

τ0

3

κ −1

S−3 1 − S22 N(S) n = n0 τ0

τ

3 N(S)

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 n+δn x [fm] δ=0 δ=0.001, c=-3 τ=6 fm/c 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 (n+δn)/n x [fm] δ=0 δ=0.01, c=-3 δ=0.01, c=2 δ=0.005, c=-3 δ=0.005, c=2 τ=6 fm/c

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 20 / 38

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Single-particle distribution

Source function → J¨ uttner-distribution: S(x, p)d4x = Nn exp

  • −pµuµ

T

  • H(τ)pµd3Σµ(xµ)dτ

(19) The Cooper–Frye factor:pµd3Σµ(xµ) = pµuµ

u0 d3x

Freeze out at const. proper time (τ0)→ H(τ) = δ(τ − τ0) With the perturbations: S(x, p) = Nn exp

  • −pµuµ

T

  • δ(τ − τ0)pµuµ

u0 · (1 + ∆)dτdx3 ∆ = δu0 u0 + pµδuµ pνuν − pµδuµ T + pµuµδT T 2 + δn n

  • Single-particle distribution:

N1(p) =

  • S(x, p)d4x

(20)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 21 / 38

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

Single-particle transverse momentum distribution, S = t/r

Two component Gaussian: N(p) = Nn0E1V1(1 + P1 + P2 + P3) + Nn0E2V2(P4 + P5) E1 = exp

  • − E 2+m2

2ET0 − p2 2ETeff

  • E2 = exp
  • − E 2+m2

2ET0 − p2 2ETeff,δ

  • Used parameters: describes hadronic & photonic data (v2, RHBT, N(pT))
  • M. Csan´

ad, M. Vargyas, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 473 (2010)

0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 100 200 300 (N1(pt)+δN1(pt))/N1(pt) pt [MeV] δ=0, c=0 δ=0.1, c=4 δ=0.5, c=-3 δ=0.5, c=7 δ=0.5, c=-9

Effective temperatures: Teff = T0 + T0E ˙ R0

2

2b(T0 − E) Teff,δ = T0 + T0E ˙ R0

2

2b(2T0 − E)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 22 / 38

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Perturbative handling The new class of solutions Observables

HBT-radii for S = t/r

Size of the source → HBT-radii R−2 ∝ mt scaling R2

HBT = T0τ 2 0 (Teff − T0)

ETeff R2

HBT,δ = T0τ 2 0 (Teff,δ − T0)

ETeff,δ

2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 200 400 600 800 RHBT, RHBT,δ [fm] pt [MeV/c] RHBT(pt) RHBT,δ(pt) 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 200 400 600 800 1/RHBT

2, 1/RHBT,δ 2 [1/fm2]

mt [MeV/c2] 1/RHBT

2(pt)

1/RHBT,δ

2(pt)

Parameters: δ = 0.5, c = −3

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 23 / 38

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

The HBT effect and the Bose-Einstein correlations

  • R. Hanbury Brown, R. Q. Twiss - radio telescopes

Intensity correlations as function of detector distance → Measuring the size of the source (Sirius)

Goldhaber et al. - application in high energy physics

Bose-Einstein correlations - momentum correlations Related to the source function C(q) ∼ = 1 + |

  • S(r)eiqrdr|2, where q = p2 − p1

Measuring momentum correlations → femtoscopic space-time geometry

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 24 / 38

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

The PHENIX experiment

Different collision energies

7.7-200 GeV in √sNN 20-400 MeV in µB

Different collision systems

p+p, p+A, A+A

This analysis: 200 GeV Au+Au

particle emitting source space-time evolution of sQGP

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 28 / 38

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

L´ evy distribution and the shape of the correlation function

Expanding medium → increasing mean free path

→ Anomalous diffusion

L´ evy-stable distribution (generalized cent. lim. theor.) L(r; α, R) = 1 (2π)3

  • d3qeiqre− 1

2 |qR|α

Power-law tail: ∝ r−1−α L´ evy exponent: α (Gaussian: α = 2, Cauchy: α = 1) Two component source:

Cs¨

  • rg˝
  • , T. and L¨
  • rstad, B. and Zim´

anyi, J., Z. Phys. C71 , 491 (1996), hep-ph/9411307

Core: thermalized medium, expanding source Halo: long lived resonances (τ > 10 fm/c)→ experimentally unresolvable

True q → 0 limit: C(q = 0) = 2; Experimentally: C(q → 0) = 1 + λ Correlation strength: λ =

  • NCore

NCore+NHalo

2

  • Corr. func.: C(q; R, α, λ) = 1 + λe−|qR|α

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 29 / 38

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

The connection of L´ evy-index and the critical point

Looking for critical behavior with critical exponents Critical spatial correlation: ∼ r−(d−2−η) L´ evy source: ∼ r−(1+α) → η ⇐ ⇒ α ?

Cs¨

  • rg˝
  • et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 828 525532 (2006)

QCD universality class ⇐ ⇒ 3D Ising

Halasz et al., Phys. Rev. D58 096007 (1998) Stephanov et al., Phys. Rev. Let. 81 4816 (1998)

Critical point: η ≤ 0.50 Motivation for precise L´ evy HBT! Finite size, non-equilibrium effects

What does the power-law tail mean?

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 30 / 38

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

Bersch-Pratt coordinates, LCMS frame

Particles with the same mass (pions), with momentum k1 and k2

Average momentum: K = (k1 + k2)/2 Relative momentum: q = (k1 − k2)

Bertsch-Pratt coordinates: q = (qout, qside, qlong)

Out: direction of average transverse momentum Long: beam direction Side: perpendicular to both

Longitudinally comoving system (LCMS): Klong = 0

qLCMS

  • ut

= qxKx + qyKy KT , KT =

  • K 2

x + K 2 y ,

qLCMS

side

= qxKy − qyKx KT , mT =

  • m2 + K 2

T,

qLCMS

long

=

  • 4 (k1zE2 − k2zE1)2

(E1 + E2)2 − (k1z + k2z)2 , qLCMS = KT mT qLCMS

  • ut

.

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 31 / 38

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

Three-dimensional correlation function

3D correlations of identified same charged pion pairs Measured in 31 different transverse-mass (mT) bins L´ evy-source: C 0

2 = 1 + λ exp(−|q2

  • R2
  • + q2

s R2 s + q2 l R2 l |α/2)

Example correlation function → 1D projections Charged pions → (approx.) Coulomb correction

  • ut

side long B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 32 / 38

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

The size of the source

L´ evy-scale parameter vs. mT describes the size of the source Comparison with 1D L´ evy results

  • A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911 arXiv:1709.05649

Source is not spherical Hydro scaling: R ∝ 1/√mT

]

2

[GeV/c

T

m 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

R [fm] 2 4 6 8 10 12 PHENIX

  • ut

) 3D

  • π
  • π

(

  • ut

R ) 3D

+

π

+

π (

  • ut

R ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

R ( ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π R ( ]

2

[GeV/c

T

m 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 side 0-30 % Centrality ) 3D

  • π
  • π

(

side

R ) 3D

+

π

+

π (

side

R ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

R ( ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π R ( ]

2

[GeV/c

T

m 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 long = 200 GeV

NN

s Au+Au ) 3D

  • π
  • π

(

long

R ) 3D

+

π

+

π (

long

R ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

R ( ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π R (

PH ENIX

preliminary B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 33 / 38

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

The strength of the correlation

]

2

[GeV/c

T

m

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

λ

0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 3D

  • π
  • π

3D

+

π

+

π 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π PHENIX 0-30% Centrality = 200 GeV

NN

s Au+Au PH ENIX

preliminary

Correlation strength vs. mT Ratio of resonance pions: √ λ =

NCore NCore+NHalo

Agreement with prev. 1D results

]

2

[GeV/c

T

m

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 max

λ / λ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

= 200 GeV

NN

s PHENIX 0-30% Au+Au

(syst)),

  • 0.14

+0.23

0.02(stat) ± H=(0.59 /NDF=83/60, CL=2.7%

2

χ ,

2

(syst)) GeV/c

  • 0.09

+0.08

0.01(stat) ± =(0.30 σ =55 MeV

  • 1

' η

*=958 MeV, B

' η

m =168 MeV

  • 1

' η

*=530 MeV, B

' η

m =55 MeV

  • 1

' η

*=530 MeV, B

' η

m =55 MeV

  • 1

' η

*=250 MeV, B

' η

m )]

2

σ )/(2

2 π

  • m

2 T

1 - H exp[-(m PRL105,182301(2010), PRC83,054903(2011), resonance model: Kaneta and Xu

2

(0.55-0.9) GeV/c

〉 λ 〈 =

max

λ

  • π
  • π

+

π

+

π

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 34 / 38

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction Hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics Femtoscopy at PHENIX Summary Introduction Three-dimensional L´ evy HBT Kinematic variables 3D L´ evy HBT at PHENIX

The shape of the correlation

]

2

[GeV/c

T

m

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

α

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 3D

  • π
  • π

3D

+

π

+

π 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π PHENIX 0-30% Centrality = 200 GeV

NN

s Au+Au PH ENIX

preliminary

L´ evy exponent vs. mT Describes the shape of cor. func. Far from Gaussian (α = 2) Far from Cauchy (α = 1) Also far from 3D Ising CEP value (α ≤ 0.5) Agreement with prev. 1D results

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 35 / 38

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Summary

Hubble-flow uµ = xµ τ p = p0 τ0 τ 3+ 3

κ

n = n0 τ0 τ 3 N(S) Perturbations δuµ = δ · F(τ)g(xν)∂µS · χ(S) δp = δ · p0π(S) τ0 τ 3+ 3

κ

δn = δ · n0 τ0 τ 3 h(xν)ν(S) Accomplishments: New relativistic, accelerating, perturbative family of solutions Many possible particular solutions Measurables can be computed Outlook: Non-spherical symmetry Other S, g(xν) and h(xν) functions Another known solution

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Summary

The results of this work: Acceptable fits assuming L´ evy source in 3D These results are consistent with the 1D L´ evy results

  • A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911 arXiv:1709.05649

α L´ evy exponent: non-Gaussian, anomalous diffusion? Scale parameter: hydro like scaling: R ∝ 1/√mT The source is not spherical

]

2

[GeV/c

T

m

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

λ

0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 3D

  • π
  • π

3D

+

π

+

π 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π PHENIX 0-30% Centrality = 200 GeV

NN

s Au+Au PH ENIX preliminary ]

2

[GeV/c

T

m 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 R [fm] 2 4 6 8 10 12 PHENIX

  • ut

) 3D

  • π
  • π

(

  • ut

R ) 3D

+

π

+

π (

  • ut

R ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

R ( ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π R ( ]

2

[GeV/c

T

m 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 side 0-30 % Centrality ) 3D

  • π
  • π

(

side

R ) 3D

+

π

+

π (

side

R ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

R ( ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π R ( ]

2

[GeV/c

T

m 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 long = 200 GeV

NN

s Au+Au ) 3D

  • π
  • π

(

long

R ) 3D

+

π

+

π (

long

R ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

R ( ) 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π R (

PH ENIX preliminary ]

2

[GeV/c

T

m

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

α

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 3D

  • π
  • π

3D

+

π

+

π 1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

  • π
  • π

1D Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911

+

π

+

π PHENIX 0-30% Centrality = 200 GeV

NN

s Au+Au PH ENIX preliminary

Plans: Developing a 3D Coulomb correction Further info: arXiv:1810.05402, arXiv:1809.09392, arXiv:1711.05446

Thank you for your attention!

Supported by the ´ UNKP-18-1 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Appendix Appendix

Phase diagram of the strongly interacting matter

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 38 / 38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Appendix Appendix

Perturbations on a standing fluid: waves

Known solution: Standing fluid uµ = (1, 0, 0, 0) p = const. n = const. Exploit these fields: ∂µuµ = 0 ∂µp = 0 uµ∂µ = ∂0 Qµν = (uµuν − gµν) Qµν∂µ = (0, ∇) Perturbed Energy equation κ∂0δp + (κ + 1)p∂µδuµ = 0 Perturbed Euler equation (κ + 1)p∂0δuν − Qµν∂µδp = 0 Wave solution for pressure ∂2

0δp = 1

κ∆δp

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 39 / 38

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Appendix Appendix

Decomposition of energy-momentum tensor

Two equations: Lorentz-orthogonal to uµ Lorentz-perpendicular to uµ Euler equation (κ + 1)puν∂νuµ = (gµν − uµuν)∂νp Energy equation κuµ∂µp + (κ + 1)p∂µuµ = 0

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 40 / 38

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Appendix Appendix

Perturbative equations

Euler equation (κ + 1)δpuµ∂µuν + (κ + 1)pδuµ∂µuν + (κ + 1)puµ∂µδuν = (gµν − uµuν)∂µδp − δuµuν∂µp − uµδuν∂µp (21) Energy equation κδuµ∂µp + κuµ∂µδp + (κ + 1)δp∂µuµ + (κ + 1)p∂µδuµ = 0 (22) Continuity equation uµ∂µδn + δn∂µuµ + δuµ∂µn + n∂µδuµ = 0 (23)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 41 / 38

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Appendix Appendix

Perturbed equations

Euler equation: Energy equation: Continuity: ∂µδp (κ + 1)p [gµν − uµuν] = κ − 3 τκ δuν + uµ∂µδuν (24) κuµ∂µδp + 3(κ + 1) τ δp = −(κ + 1)p∂µδuµ (25) δuµnN ′(S) N(S) ∂µS + uµ∂µδn + 3δn τ + n∂µδuµ = 0 (26)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 42 / 38

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Appendix Appendix

Solving the energy equation

Pressure perturbation δp = δ · p0 τ0 τ 3+ 3

κ π(S). (27)

Four-velocity perturbation δuµ = δ · F(τ)g(xµ)∂µS · χ(S) (28) Orthogonality satisfied (δuµuµ = 0) Energy equation χ′(S) χ(S) = − ∂µ∂µS ∂µS∂µS − ∂µS∂µ ln g(xµ) ∂µS∂µS (29) Right side is a function of S!

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 43 / 38

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Appendix Appendix

Solution of the Euler equation

Using (27) and (28) perturbations: Euler equation: π′(S) χ(S) = (κ + 1)

  • F(τ)
  • uµ∂µg(xµ) − 3g(xµ)

κτ

  • + F ′(τ)g(xµ)
  • (30)

Right side is a function of S Restriction for S, g(xµ), F(τ)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 44 / 38

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Appendix Appendix

Solving the continuity equation

Using (28) form of perturbation The particle density perturbation δn = δ · n0 τ0 τ 3 h(xµ)ν(S) (31) Continuity equation ν(S) χ(S)N ′(S) = −F(τ)g(xµ)∂µS∂µS uµ∂µh(xµ) (32) Right side is a funciton of S Restriction for S, h(xµ), F(τ)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 45 / 38

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Appendix Appendix

Scaling variable S = r m/τ m

Scaling variable S = rm/τ m χ(S) = S− m+1

m

  • S

2 m + 1

(33) π(S) = (κ + 1)(κ − 3) κ

  • π0 − m
  • 1 + S− 2

m

  • ,

(34) ν(S) = m2S2 S− 2

m + 1

  • S− m+1

m

  • S

2 m + 1

N ′(S) (35)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 46 / 38

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Appendix Appendix

Scaling variable S = τ m/tm

Scaling variable S = τ m/tm χ(S) = S

2 m −1

  • 1 − S

2 m

3

2

(36) π(S) = (κ + 1)(κ − 3) κ  π0 + m

  • 1 − S

2 m

  (37) ν(S) = m2S2 S

2 m −1

1 − S

2 m

N ′(S) (38)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 47 / 38

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Source function

S(x, p) = Nδ(τ − τ0)dτd3xn0 τ0 τ 3 N(S) exp  −Et − xpx − ypy − zpz τT0 τ0

τ

3

κ

N(S)  

  • E − xpx + ypy + zpz

t

  • ·

·

  • 1 + δ
  • − (τ + cτ

κ−3 κ

τ

3 κ )∂0Sχ(S)τ

t + + (τ + cτ

κ−3 κ

τ

3 κ )χ(S)t

Et − xpx − ypy − zpz pµ∂µS+ + (Et − xpx − ypy − zpz)(N(S)π(S) − h(x, y, z, t)ν(S)) τT0 τ0

τ

3

κ

+ + h(x, y, z, t)ν(S) N(S)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Appendix Appendix

Single-particle distribution

N(p) = Nn0E1V1(1 + P1 + P2 + P3) + Nn0E2V2(P4 + P5) (39) The newly introduced functions: E1 = exp

E2 + m2 2ET0 − p2 2ETeff

  • ,

V1 =

  • 2πT0τ2

E

  • 1 −

T0 Teff 3 E − p2 E

  • 1 −

T0 Teff

  • ,

(40) E2 = exp

E2 + m2 2ET0 − p2 2ETeff ,δ

  • ,

V2 =

  • 2πT0τ2

E

  • 1 −

T0 Teff ,δ 3 E − p2 E

  • 1 −

T0 Teff ,δ

  • .

(41) The perturbative terms are: P1 = − δ(1 + c)τ2 r1

  • τ2

0 + r2 1

, P2 = δ(1 + c)τ0 E −

p2ρ2 1

  • τ2

0 +r2 1

   E r1 − (p2ρ2

1)

  • τ2

0 + r2 1

r3

1

   , (42) P3 = δ2bcκ (3 − κ)R2    r1

  • τ2

0 + r2 1

  

3 τ0

r1 4 , P5 = − δ(τ0 + cτ0) T0    E r2 − (p2ρ2

2)

  • τ2

0 + r2 2

r3

2

   , (43) P4 = δ2bE

  • τ2

0 + r2 2 − p2ρ2 2

˙ R0

2τ0T0

  • (κ + 1)(κ − 3)

κ τ2

0 + r2 2

r2 − cκ 3 − κ τ0    r2

  • τ2

0 + r2 2

  

3 τ0

r2 4 . (44) B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 49 / 38

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Appendix Appendix

The way of finding a concrete solution

Calculate F(τ) from (9) Choose a g(xµ) Choose h(xµ) so (10) is fullfilled Choose S Calculate χ(S) Calculate π(S) Calculate ν(S) δp δuµ δn

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 50 / 38

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Appendix Appendix

Global, single particle and paircuts

Same cuts as in previous 1D Levy analysis

  • A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. C 97, 064911 arXiv:1709.05649

Event selection:

Centrality: 0 − 30% z-vertex: ±30 cm

Single particle cuts:

PID: 2σ ID matching: 2σ

Paircuts:

Custom shaped cuts in ∆ϕ − ∆z distributions for EMC,DCH,TOFE,TOFW

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 51 / 38

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Appendix Appendix

Paircuts

EMCE, EMCW, DCH: ∆ϕ > ∆ϕ0 − ∆ϕ0 ∆z0 ∆z ´ es ∆ϕ > ∆ϕ1 TOFE: ∆ϕ > ∆ϕ0 − ∆ϕ0 ∆z0 ∆z TOFW: ∆ϕ > ∆ϕ0 ´ es ∆z > ∆z0 cut DCH EMC TOFE TOFW z0 ϕ0 ϕ1 z0 ϕ0 ϕ1 z0 ϕ0 z0 ϕ0 11 0.15 0.025 18 0.14 0.020 13 0.13 15 0.085

Table: Parameter values for paircuts.

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 52 / 38

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Appendix Appendix

Binning in q

Actual distribution A(q): rel. mom. dist. of pion pairs from same events

Bose-Einstein effect and others (acceptance and detector effects.)

Background distribution B(q): pion pairs from different events

No Bose-Einstein but all the others

Two particle correlation: C2(q) = A(q)/B(q) Fine resolution at low q (Bose–Einstein peak) & long enough background

Could not increase the number of bins because of memory handling

→ Two solutions:

1 Non-uniform bin width (finer at low q and wider bins as q increases) 2 mT dependent binning (BE-peak gets wider with increasing mT) The two yields the same result (included in syst. errors)

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 53 / 38

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Appendix Appendix

q-binning

Non-equal binning: ∆qi =    2 MeV, i = 1, 2, · · · 50, ∆qi−1 ·

  • qi−1+∆qi−1

qi−1

1.2 , i = 51, 52, · · · 100. mT dependent binning: qmax = √mT · 325.106 MeV, hydro scaling: R ∝ 1/√mT qmax = 300 MeV in the last mT bin

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 54 / 38

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Appendix Appendix

Systematic uncertainties

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 55 / 38

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Appendix Appendix

Coulomb-correction

Charged particles → Coulomb correction K C Coulomb

2

(q, λ, α, R) = C 0

2 (q, λ, α, R) · K(q, λ, α, R)

Same Coulomb corr. used as for 1D L´ evy analysis

Very detailed numerical table calculated in advance Calculated for different q, and parameter values Spherically symmetric source

From preliminary results we see a non-spherical source ! We plan to develop a 3D Coulomb correction

B´ alint Kurgyis Hydrodynamics and femtoscopy 56 / 38