Illinois & Chicago Fire Fighters The Fight for Funding - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

illinois chicago fire fighters the fight for funding
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Illinois & Chicago Fire Fighters The Fight for Funding - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Illinois & Chicago Fire Fighters The Fight for Funding Presented by: Richard Martin, AFFI Southern District Legislative Representative Eddy Crews, AFFI Northern District Legislative Representative Dan Fabrizio, Director of Political Action,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Illinois & Chicago Fire Fighters The Fight for Funding

Presented by: Richard Martin, AFFI Southern District Legislative Representative Eddy Crews, AFFI Northern District Legislative Representative Dan Fabrizio, Director of Political Action, Chicago Fire Fighters Union, Local 2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Crisis Creates Opportunity Factors:

  • Economic Downturn
  • New Governor
  • New Mayor
slide-3
SLIDE 3

History of Pensions in Illinois Chicago Fire

  • 25 year return

9.25%

  • Average Retirement Age

57.4

  • Average Service Years

30.5

  • 4,808 Active Participants
  • 4,107 Benefit Recipients

– 2,977 Service (63%) – 329 Disabilities – 1,315 Widows (20%) – 83 Children /Parent

  • Average Benefit

$70,000 (2014)

  • The fund currently uses a multiplier formula to fund: participant 9 1/8%; City 2.26%;

approximately

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fire Fighters outside Chicago

  • Over 600 local police & fire funds
  • Benefits in State Statute
  • Funded at the local level, no state dollars
slide-5
SLIDE 5

COGFA Study

  • Commission on Government Forecasting

& Accountability

  • Causes of underfunding and increases in

unfunded liability

  • Mayors commission to strengthen

Chicago Pensions, benefits are not the problem

slide-6
SLIDE 6

State of Illinois Passed Tier II Pension Plan

  • Police & Fire were exempt
  • We held out for contribution enforcement
  • ARC
  • New Chicago Police & Fire funding formula
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Governor Rauner’s Turnaround Agenda

  • Repeal prevailing wage
  • Repeal project labor agreements
  • Repeal bargaining for public employees
  • Causation standards for Work Comp.
  • Change benefits for Tier I
  • Eliminate PSEBA benefits
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SB 777

  • Passed by the Illinois General Assembly
  • Vetoed by Governor Rauner
  • Veto was overridden by supermajorities in

both chambers

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Any proceeds received by the city in relation to the operation

  • f a casino or casinos within the city shall be expended by the

city for payment to the Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago. If the city fails to transmit to the fund contributions required

  • f it under this Article for more than 90 days. The fund shall

give notice to the city, certified to the State Comptroller the amounts of delinquent payments. The controller must, beginning in fiscal 2016, deduct and deposit into the fund proportions of grants of state funds to the city. 2016 – 1/3 of the total amount of grants 2017 – 2/3 of the total amount of grants 2018 – Total amount each fiscal year thereafter.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Beginning January 1, 2016, the city shall be obligated to contribute to the fund in each fiscal year an amount not less than the amount determined annually. If the city fails to pay the amount guaranteed under this section, the fund may bring a mandamus action in the Circuit Court of Cook County to comply the city to make required payments Minimum Widows currently $1,000 a month/ no COLA; new – 125% of poverty‐$1250 COLA CPI Minimum Firefighter – currently $1,000 a month/ no COLA; 125% of poverty ‐$1250 COLA ‐ CPI

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PA 1495 SB777 Difference 2015 $246,132 $199,000 ($47,132) 2016 $284,086 $208,000 ($76,086) 2017 $292,439 $227,000 ($65,439) 2018 $301,752 $235,000 ($66,752) 2019 $311,205 $245,000 ($66,025) Total 1,435,614 1,114,000 (321,614) The years shown are the year the City budgets the amount, the funds are received the following year. e.g 2016 ‐ $199,000

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Year Assets Liabilities Deficit Funded Ratio 1931 $1.9 $41.6 $39.7 4.6% 1941 $9.3 $49.1 $39.8 18.9% 1951 $15.7 $68.3 $52.6 23.0% 1961 $53.0 $126.7 $73.8 41.8% 1971 $142.7 $313.2 $170.4 45.6% 1981 $310.1 $608.1 $297.9 51.0% 1991 $572.5 $1,232.4 $659.9 46.5% 2001 $1,245.1 $2,068.7 $823.6 60.2% 2011 $1,101.7 $3,898.9 $2,797.2 28.3% Funded Status by Decade (in millions) Between 1887 and 1930, the pension fund had its assets depleted due to chronic underfunding on four separate occasions (1887, 1895, 1917, 1926)

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Year Ending Actuarial Value Funded Ratio Statutory Contribution 2014 23.31% 112,169 2015 25.10% 246,132 2025 37.52% 336,114 2035 65.60% 415,213 2040 90.00% 438,072 2041 90.00% 34,296 SB1495 Statutory Contribution

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Year Ending Actuarial Value Funded Ratio Statutory Contribution 2014 21.29% 109,532 2015 19.75% 113,915 2025 3.25% 354,664 2035 10.26% 430,351 2045 26.32% 478,827 2055 58.05% 550,021 2060 83.75% 592,529 2061 90.00% 601,417 2062 90.00% 40,341 HB 3088 Statutory Contribution

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Year Ending Actuarial Value Funded Ratio Statutory Contribution 2014 22.75% $109,813 2015 23.15% 199,000 2025 30.12% 356,818 2035 43.15% 425,140 2045 61.09% 469,888 2055 90.00% 539,487 SB777 Statutory Contribution

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Illinois Constitution of 1970 Illinois Supreme Court Cases

  • Article 13, section 5 (inserted at the

Constitutional Convention in 1970 on behalf

  • f police & fire fighters
  • McNamee Supreme Court case regarding

funding in 1993

  • Supreme Court on SB 1 in 2014 (protected

benefits)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Illinois State Constitution of 1970 Article XIII‐ General Provisions Section 5 . Pension and Retirement Rights Membership in any pension or retirement system of the State, any unit of local government or school district, or any agency or instrumentally thereof, shall be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

McNamee vs. State of Illinois, 173 Ill.2d 433 (1996) Ruling The Circuit Court of Cook County granted the plaintiffs summary judgment, and the Illinois Supreme Court reversed on appeal. Holding . In reversing the ruling of the circuit court, the justices held that the framers of the constitution did not intent to regulate funding, and that Article XIII, Section 5 creates an enforceable contractual relationship that protects only the pensioner’s right to receive benefits.

Funding was not guaranteed by the Illinois Supreme Court

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Summary

  • Fight for Funding
  • Crisis created opportunity
  • We now have an ARC
  • Chicago has new funding formula and

future dedicated revenue stream

  • Questions