Impact of channel geometry and rotation on the trapping of internal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

impact of channel geometry and rotation on the trapping
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Impact of channel geometry and rotation on the trapping of internal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Impact of channel geometry and rotation on the trapping of internal tides Sybren Drijfhout and Leo Maas The internal wave drag due to oscillating flow over topography: 1 = 2 D N h u b tide 2 The energy flux per unit area out of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Impact of channel geometry and rotation on the trapping of internal tides

Sybren Drijfhout

and

Leo Maas

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The internal wave drag due to oscillating flow over topography: The energy flux per unit area out of barotropic tides:

〉 〈 =

2 2

2 1 ) , (

tide b

u h N y x E κ ρ

tide b

u h N D

2

2 1 κ =

The turbulent dissipation:

) ( ) , ( ) / ( z F y x E q ρ ε =

The relation of dissipation to diffusion:

2

N k k v ε Γ + =

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 60 to 90% of the energy flux from barotropic to internal tides is

contained in low-mode internal waves that are able to propagate large distances from the generation site

  • Dissipation of these low-modes waves gives rise to a canonical

background mixing of k0= 10-5 m2/s

  • The remaining portion, denoted as the “tidal dissipation

efficiency” (q), dissipates as locally enhanced turbulent mixing

  • Three questions remain:

(1) How important is the energy flux from the wind? (2) does q vary from site to site? (3) can the radiating low-mode waves be trapped, giving rise to sites of enhanced mixing, unrelated to local generation?

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Three-dimensional effects

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Top view Focusing

  • n wave

attractor ‘Edge wave’ type trapping 3D view Circle: critical depth N=const

x0

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Research Question

  • Does geometrical trapping of internal waves exist in 3D?
  • Can trapping be predicted by the nondimensional parameter

L H f N

2 2 2 2

− − = ω ω τ

0.87 < < 1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Methodology

  • MICOM’s 3D isopycnic model
  • Horizontal resolution: 3.75 km; Vertical resolution: 100 m
  • Channel geometry: 1200 x 191.25 km
  • Sponge layer in west, continental slope in east
  • Barotropic velocity in sponge layer forced
  • Bottom either flat or parabolic
  • f = 0, N = 3.0 10-3 ; or, f = 10-4, N = 2.2 10-3

94 . = τ

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Channel model

slide-16
SLIDE 16

W E

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

S N S N

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

W S N E E W S S N

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conclusions

  • A cross-channel bottom slope constrains the

penetration of the internal tidal energy due to trapping upon multiple refractions.

  • Near the critical depth edge-waves carry part of

the energy much further away from the slope.

  • In case of rotation, near the shelf-slope the

trapped “Poincaré wave” and southern boundary-edge wave interact, destroying the characteristics of the attractor.

  • The Kelvin wave along the northern slope acts

as an internal wave generator.