Impact of Sludge Towards Stabilization of the Fire Road Mine M. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

impact of sludge towards stabilization of the fire road
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Impact of Sludge Towards Stabilization of the Fire Road Mine M. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Impact of Sludge Towards Stabilization of the Fire Road Mine M. Coleman 1 , K.D.Phinney 2 + + 1 NB Power 2 Consulting Chemist./Chemical Engineer Mine Location Background Mined 1982-1985; 250 acre site (100 ha). AMD since mid-80s.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Impact of Sludge Towards Stabilization of the Fire Road Mine

  • M. Coleman1, K.D.Phinney2+

+

1 NB Power 2 Consulting Chemist./Chemical Engineer

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mine Location

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • Mined 1982-1985;
  • 250 acre site (100 ha).
  • AMD since mid-80’s.
  • Waste rock contoured
  • Hydrated lime treatment
  • 4 one -acre sludge ponds/yr
  • Long term solution-sludge disposal into waste rock
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Initial Dredging Rationale

  • Disposing of lime neutralization sludge into

acid generating rock could provide several benefits including:

  • utilization of the excess alkalinity
  • final disposal area for sludge
  • minimize additional land disturbance
  • decrease personal liability
  • reduce accessibility of oxygen into the waste rock.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Equivalent Lime Consumption and Mine Water Pond Acidity

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Mg/L as CaCO3 Tonnes of CaCO3 Years

CaCO3 equiv of lime consumed Mine water pond Acidity (mg/L)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Decreasing Acidity in Mine Water from Monitoring Wells

Acidity Scale (mg/l) Pink >1000 Orange 200-1000 Gray 150-200 Green <150

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Factors That May be Impacting the Change in Acid Generation

  • 1. Waste rock weathering.
  • 2. Vegetation coverage increasing.
  • 3. Putting the sludge back onto the

waste rock.

  • 4. pH of precipitation
  • 26,000 m3

sludge, late fall 2014

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Objectives

  • We are noticing a decrease in mine water
  • acidity. Why?
  • Changes in in-situ neutralization?
  • Impact of neutral pH groundwater or precip

recharge?

  • Waste rock weathering into smaller particles?
  • Is AMD burning out?
  • Can you measure or calculate the impact of the

sludge on the acidity of the mine water?

  • Are there short term impacts that can be identified

after each dredging period?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Groundwater Chemistry Evaluation

  • Generated acidity (initial acidity)
  • Calculated acidity as a result of oxidation of sulfide

minerals

  • Equivalent to SO4
  • 2 concentration (original H2SO4)
  • Residual acidity
  • Calculated acidity due to mineral acidity (H+)

and conc. of metallic ions (Al, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn)

  • Equivalent to CaCO3 demand for neutralization
  • % Acidity removed in-situ in the waste rock
  • Difference between (initial and residual)/initial)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Compare Consumed CaCO3

versus

Calculated Residual Acidity Demand

Equivalent to CaCO3 demand for neutralization

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Comparison of Calculated Residual Acidity versus Measured Acidity

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Oct-14 Dec-14 Feb-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Oct-15 Dec-15 Feb-16 Apr-16 Jun-16 Aug-16 Oct-16 Dec-16 Mg/L as CaCO3 Residual Acidity Acidity Measured in Grab Sample

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Groundwater Monitoring

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Initial and Residual Acidity

in Mine Water Well 26S, 26D and 27

20 40 60 80 100 2000 4000 6000 8000

1988 1996 2006 2014 % Reacted mg/L as CaCO3

MW 26S

20 40 60 80 100 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 1988 1996 2006 2014

MW26D

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Initial and Residual Acidity

in Mine Water Wells 17S, 17D and 16D

20 40 60 80 100 2000 4000 6000 8000 1988 1996 2006 2014

MW 17S

20 40 60 80 100 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 1988 1996 2006 Jun-14

MW17D

MW 17D % acid removed Initial Generated Acidity (mg/l) residual acidty (mg/l)

20 40 60 80 100 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 1988 1998 Jun-10

MW16D

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Comparison of Initial and Residual Acidity in Mine Water Pond

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Jun-96 Jun-97 Jun-98 Jun-99 Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02 Jun-03 Jun-04 Jun-05 Jun-06 Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Acidity (mg/L as CaCO3) Year Initial Acidity Pond Residual Acidity Pond

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Comparison of Initial and Residual Acidity in Mine Water Pond- Impact of Dredging

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 mg/L as CaCO3 Years Initial Acidity Pond Residual Acidity Pond

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Mine Water Pond -% Acidity Removed In-situ

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Apr-10 Aug-10 Dec-10 Apr-11 Aug-11 Dec-11 Apr-12 Aug-12 Dec-12 Apr-13 Aug-13 Dec-13 Apr-14 Aug-14 Dec-14 Apr-15 Aug-15 Dec-15 Apr-16 Aug-16 Dec-16 Percent Acidity Removed In-situ Year

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Estimated Lime Savings after Dredging

20 35 39 54 12 9 6.4 11.6 13.5 20.2 4.5 3.4 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2010 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 Lime Savings (thousands of dollars) Acidity (mg/L) tonnes of Ca(OH)2 Year of Dredging

Ave Residual Acidity Prior to Dredging Ave Residual Acidity After Dredging Lime Savings at Ca(OH)2 (tonnes) Lime Savings ($)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • Decreases in initial mine water acidity a result of

acid generation “burning out”-less acid production.

  • SO4 decreasing , (example well 26 above the sludge influence)
  • mine water pH increasing
  • lower Al conc so partial dissolution of feldspars and mica?
  • In-situ neutralization is occurring.
  • Residual acidity is much less than initial acidity
  • We saw in well 16D that we can have initial acidity

but have it mostly neutralized in-situ.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Conclusions

  • The percentage of acidity removed in-situ

is increasing.

  • Waste rock weathering (smaller particle size… increased

surface area)?

  • Trend will most likely continue but those sites at higher

percentages seem to taper off and not hit 100%

  • Based at what we saw at well 16D, we may not need to hit

100%.

  • At what point will the residual acidity be negligible at the

mine water pond but “spot” neutralization may be required at specific areas within the mine site?

  • Look at surface amendments to increase alkalinity?
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions

  • There are some measurements that can be made
  • n the impact of the sludge on the acidity of the

mine water.

  • The effect of dredging can be monitored by acidity and pH

changes as a plug or plume flow in the mine water pond chemistry.

  • Almost $60K in estimated lime savings from last 4 dredging

episodes

  • Propose to look at potential cost savings to recycle sludge

directly back into waste rock during low groundwater flow periods to reduce dredging costs.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Impact of Sludge Towards Stabilization of the Fire Road Mine

In memory of K.D.Phinney2

1946-February 2017

1 NB Power 2 Consulting Chemist./Chemical Engineer