Implementation and Delivery Report Dorking Town Forum May 2018 X - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
implementation and delivery report
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implementation and Delivery Report Dorking Town Forum May 2018 X - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 29, 2022 218 likes •903 views

Dorking Transport Package - Phase 1 Implementation and Delivery Report Dorking Town Forum May 2018 X X X X X X Excerpt from: Mole Valley Local Committee papers September 2015 X Not delivered Note: This document is arranged to

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dorking Transport Package - Phase 1

Implementation and Delivery Report

Dorking Town Forum May 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

X – Not delivered

X X X X X X

Excerpt from: Mole Valley Local Committee papers September 2015

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Note: This document is arranged to mirror the

  • rder and format of illustrations in the

report. As a consequence there will be a fair amount of repetition between some sections.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3) Investigation Process

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Working Draft – April 2018

Ph I Safety Audit Not done

06/2014 12/2014 12/2015 06/2016 06/2017 12/2017 06/2015 12/2016

Principal Schedule External Contact Third Party Involvement/Influence/Funding Secondary Players: Surrey Police (Cannon), WSCC (Little) Primary Players: FGW, NR, MVLC (Hall, Curran, Watson), Local Partnerships (Hogger, Sachs) MVDC, Southern, Kier

Wayfinding

Bus Shelter/RTPI

Footpath/Cycling

Project Team Meetings

MVCF not contacted until 4 February, DTCF and MVAF not at all. Decision 9 Feb Shelter Contract, Expired! A, E, no B A24/S.Approach confirm widening

Core: Fishwick, Guy, Hannam, Ligertwood, Woodall, (Curry), (Sharpington)

On-station RTPI Train/Bus

+ WS Atkins, MVDC (Straw, Shaw), (GWR?) + MVDC, GWR, Clear Channel, Trapeze + Kier, NR, Southern (Best)

DML RTPI issues Scope Expanding, Totems only, pressure

  • n funding

RTPI diverted to FGW and Southern Atkins produce Wayfinding Strategy No mention of need to advise C2C

  • f amendments

A24 widening out,

  • S. Approach 1m

Scope Expanded A24 Path, Road Table Issues Safety/Accessibility Issues identified Move to deliver

  • nly one RTPI

SCC (Mendes, Fishwick, Howard), FGW (Pierpoint), C2C (Sharrock, Castle) PB (Higgs)

GWR civils work commences GWR SCC Agreement 14 October 2016 GWR Civils stops, w/o Steps, Shelters, CCTV Waiting End of Shelter Contract South Street RTPI? Station.Approach confirm 1m Station Approach Path Width issue Signage Issues emerge and continue Station Approach Safety

SCC (Smith, Simpson) Surrey Police (Cannon) DTF, MVAG, MVCF

GWR install lighting hoods GWR state DfT funding Source Revised GWR Completion Date 31 December 2016 Revised GWR Completion Date 31 December 2017 Original GWR Funding Expiry 31 December 2015

C2C, Surrey, GWR Parsons Brinkerhoff

C2C writes to SCC July 2016 March 2014 NR Station Inspection 2hr (Matyiova) September 2014 NR Station Inspection 3hr (Keyran) January 2016 NR Station Inspection 18hr (Petrou) January 2018 NR Station Inspection AMEY (?) SCC/MVDC commission Atkins more safety issues emerge Bus Stop A improvements cancelled

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5a) On-Highway Delivery

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Footpath Widening – A24 London Road

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Original Path Width and Obstructions Post in original position

slide-9
SLIDE 9

New Path Width and Obstructions Post moved, Usable width remains same as pre-project

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2.5m total available Only 1.5m usable (including LTN 1/12 safety margins) Sensor extends into carriageway Hard edges create additional hazard Additional Obstructions Post-Safety Audit reduce usable width further

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Footpath Widening - Station Approach

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Before

slide-13
SLIDE 13

After

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Bus Stops and RTPI

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • no improvements or RTPI at Bus Stops A, B or E
  • RTPI only available to rail passengers at Deepdene

and Dorking Mainline

  • Dorking-bound bus passengers have further to walk

and in the wrong direction

Bus Stop A, post-project Bus Stop B, post-project Bus Stop E, post-project RTPI at exit from Deepdene Station

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

RTPI at Dorking Mainline Station

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Wayfinding and Information Signage

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Wrong Direction to Bus Stop E Poor Cycle Route to Leatherhead Magistrate Courts don’t exist Redundant Tourist Information Box No Signage at Far Side Bus Passengers directed away from nearest Bus Stop (E) Poor Route to Denbies

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Bus Stop identification letters not marked Bus Stop E not marked

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Room to inset Totem without

  • bstructing pedestrians
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Layby a more visibly convenient and obvious location Totem located without considering

  • bstruction to pedestrians
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Statutory Signage and Road Markings

slide-24
SLIDE 24

This Sign Obscured Sign Partially Obscured Sign too small to be visible West side foot/cycle path facing north

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Signs misleading - cycle allowed on /road footpath beyond this point Markings indicate segregated footpath

  • cycling permitted to the right

Markings indicate segregated path,

  • ne-way each side of white line

West side foot/cycle path facing north

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Pre-existing and New Signage suggest two way cycling on footpath is both legal and safe

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

On-Highway Safety Issues

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Before

slide-30
SLIDE 30

After

slide-31
SLIDE 31

On-Highway Safety Issues – Junction Lincoln Road and Station Approach

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

On-Highway Safety issues – Continuation of Cycle Route towards Leatherhead

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Pre-existing and New Signage suggest two way cycling on footpath is both legal and safe

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Ca. 85cm
  • Ca. 1.4m
slide-37
SLIDE 37

New Sign suggesting cycling

  • n footpath is legal

At Bus Stop B

  • Ca. 1.4m

Note position of

  • bstructions

Cycle Lane

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Cyclepath designed for southbound cycle traffic only At night counterflow cyclists on both sides blinded by oncoming traffic East side A24 Cyclepath

slide-39
SLIDE 39

On-Highway Safety Issues – Junction with A24

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • riginal trajectory

island extended +/-2m access narrowed +/-2m position of this island unchanged position of road markings unchanged trajectory now required Road markings and access confusing Lincoln Road road geometry changes make life difficult for all vehicles

slide-41
SLIDE 41

island extended +/-2m road markings make Lincoln Road access confusing Lincoln Road Lincoln Road access can be blocked by vehicles waiting to exit into A24 road geometry changes make life difficult for all vehicles

slide-42
SLIDE 42

On-Highway Safety Issues - Construction

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Hazard left unmarked until reported by a member of the public * Several vehicle impacts * Raised table completed without ensuring dropped kerbs and road surface actually met

slide-44
SLIDE 44

On-Highway Safety Issues – Post- Construction

slide-45
SLIDE 45

2.5m total available Only 1.5m usable (including LTN 1/12 safety margins) Sensor extends into carriageway Hard edges create additional hazard Additional Obstructions Post-Safety Audit reduce usable width further

slide-46
SLIDE 46

1m 2.8m to centre 2.6m Reference Viewing Height 1.7m 48 Degrees

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Deepdene Station - Condition

slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Deepdene Station RTPI installation

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Arrivals/Departures Screen invisible from ticket machine Ticket Machine and Timetables Note Position of Trunking relative to pedestrian desire line Bus/Rail RTPI installed previously

slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54

1m 2.8m to centre 2.6m Reference Viewing Height 1.7m 48 Degrees

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Safety issues – Post Stage III Safety Audit

slide-56
SLIDE 56

2.5m total available Only 1.5m usable (including LTN 1/12 safety margins) Sensor extends into carriageway Hard edges create additional hazard Additional Obstructions Post-Safety Audit reduce usable width further

slide-57
SLIDE 57

1m 2.8m to centre 2.6m Reference Viewing Height 1.7m 48 Degrees Deepdene Station RTPI Installation

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Ticket Vending Machines - Installation

slide-59
SLIDE 59
slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61
slide-62
SLIDE 62

Ticket Vending Machines

  • User Interface Compatability
slide-63
SLIDE 63

Dorking Main Ticket Vending Machine User Interface

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Deepdene Station Ticket Vending Machine User Interface

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Project Finances

slide-66
SLIDE 66
slide-67
SLIDE 67