Workshop Objective: You will leave Workshop with
- A Plan of the Actions to Launch and Institutionalize Large-
Scale Cohort Program at your Institution.
- A Collection of Action Plans by Institutional Types to Launch
Institutionalize a Scaled-Up STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Institutionalize a Scaled-Up STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) in Engineering Cohort Program Workshop Objective : You will leave Workshop with A Plan of the Actions to Launch and Institutionalize Large- Scale Cohort Program at your
STEP Program Manager
Emeritus Associate Dean
(http://nsse.indiana.edu/) identifies cohort or learning community as one of six “high impact” practices to enhance student success and retention.
structure to promote connection among students, faculty and staff, and to deliver student success services.
thereby positively influencing learning behavior…Participation in cohort programs constitutes such an environment.”
and to develop academically and professionally. Cohorts serves as a channel to direct support programs and activities for student success, retention and graduation.
Gabeinick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., andh, B.L. (1990). Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco: CA. Beachboard, M.R., Beachboard, J.C., Li, W., and Adkison, S.R. (2011). “Cohorts and Relatedness: Self-Determination Theory as an Explanation of How Learning Communities Affect Educational Outcomes,” Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853-874. Doolenm, T.L. and Biddlecombe, E. (2014). “The Impact of a Cohort Model Learning Community on First-Year Engineering Student Success,” American Journal of Engineering Education, 5(1), 27-40.
Cohort higher than STEP I (2005-2009)
Peers
Hypothesis: Higher 2nd-year retention rate versus baseline is correlated to Cohort program
χ2 =9.250 vs. 7.815) and not valid to CEAS (χ2 =6.251 vs. 7.815)
Year Total # EXEP Return to CEAS Return to WMU 2012 (baseline) 62 25 (40.3%) 40 (64.5%) 2013 Cohort 79 39 (49.4%) 67 (84.8%) 2014 Cohort 90 51 (56.6%) 83 (92.2%) 2015 Cohort 80 42 (52.5%) 57 (71.3%) 2016 Cohort 73 37 (50.7%) 52 (71.2%)
Request to stakeholder departments are made 2 months before class schedules are published
Report out Step 7 to group