Integrated HIA and environmental burden of disease Andrea Ranzi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

integrated hia and environmental burden of disease
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Integrated HIA and environmental burden of disease Andrea Ranzi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs Integrated HIA and environmental burden of disease Andrea Ranzi Arpae Reference Centre for Environment and Health Regional Agency for Preven?on, Environment


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Integrated HIA and environmental burden of disease

Andrea Ranzi – Arpae

Reference Centre for Environment and Health Regional Agency for Preven?on, Environment and Energy of Emilia-Romagna

School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • With exposure data, ERF func?ons and background

disease (mortality) rates we now can calculate change in health status

  • Variety of health effects may be calculated
  • Mortality effects important in HIA
  • How to express mortality and morbidity is

controversial:

– number of deaths versus life years lost – Weighing of the different health effects (eg. DALY) – Economic valua?on (Euro)

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Defini?on HIA

A combina?on of procedures, methods and tools by which a policy, program or project may be judged as to its poten?al effects on the health of a popula?on, and the distribu?on of those effects within the popula?on. [European Centre for Health Policy, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Gothenburg Consensus Paper (1999)]

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background disease rates Health impacts Population Source Policy/intervention Hazard 2 Hazard n Hazard Exposure Dose- response Risk Health impact assessment Benefits

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • “Robust call to arms. Stark in its warnings, but

brimming with op?mism”

  • “[…] Air pollu?on results in a greater health

burden than water, soil, or occupa?onal

  • exposures. Ambient and household air

pollu?on (HAP), is responsible for 6.5 million deaths per year (with another 7 million from tobacco smoke) and this number will increase if urgent measures are not taken”

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Impact pathway

Policy Emissions Concentra?ons Exposures Impacts Health effects Background disease rates

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Defini?on IEHIA

A means of assessing health-related problems deriving from the environment, and health-related impacts of policies and other interven?ons that affect the environment, in ways that take account of the complexi?es, interdependencies and uncertain?es of the real world.

Websites: hip://www.integrated-assessment.eu hip://en.opasnet.org/w/IEHIAS EU funded projects: INTARESE and HEIMTSA Key references: Briggs 2008. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-61

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

RR and aiributable risk

  • RR is measure of effect, not measure of public

health impact

  • We need to calculate impact: aiributable

number of cases due to the exposure

  • Steenland and Armstrong provide nice
  • verviews of calcula?ons

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Epidemiology 2006 25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

General formula for the calcula?on of aiributable cases: AC = AFexp * Ratepopgen * Popexp where: AC = aiributable cases; AFexp = aiributable frac?on in exposed people (RR – 1) / RR; Ratepopgen = background popula?on incidence rate (proxy of rate in unexposed people) Popexp = exposed people ATTRIBUTABLE CASES

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 13

AC = AFexp*B0*(ΔC/10)*Pexp

Where: ΔC / 10: the increase in atmospheric concentra?ons for which the effect is to be evaluated.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Aiributale frac?on (AF) and Popula?on Aiributable Frac?on (PAF)

1 ) 1 ( ) 1 ( + − × − × = RR f RR f PAF

This frac?on of popula?on Has this much elevated risk Addi?onal popula?on risk from the exposure Baseline risk is always 1 Addi?onal risk from the exposure (same as in numerator) Total risk, including the addi?onal risk and the baseline risk + x

RR RR AF 1 − =

AF: Everybody is exposed/affected PAF: Not everybody is exposed/affected (1) (2)

Numerator: Denominator: Attributable fraction (AFexp) 25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

hip://breathelife2030.org/ hips://gateway.euro.who.int/en/hfa-explorer/

slide-16
SLIDE 16

hips://gateway.euro.who.int/en/hfa-explorer/

Popula?on: 205.000 (Wikipedia source) AC (Trieste)= ((1.07-1)/1.07)*(205000*0.0103) *((15-10)/10)*1=0.065*2112*0.5=69 CRF: 1.07 (WHO es?mate for natural mortality and 10 µg/m3 increase of PM2.5 AC = AFexp*B0*(ΔC/10)*Pexp 3.5% of total mortality (Italy about 6%)

Rough esCmate of AC in Trieste

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

AIRQ+

  • AirQ+ can be used, with some limita?ons, for

ci?es, countries or regions to es?mate:

  • How much of a par?cular health effect is

aiributable to selected air pollutants?

  • Compared to the current scenario, what

would be the change in health effects if air pollu?on levels changed in the future?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

AIRQ+

  • AirQ+ enables users to use pre-loaded datasets for:
  • rela?ve risks (RRs) for selected pollutant health end-points pairs;
  • conversion factors between PM2.5 and PM10 at the na?onal level;

and worldwide solid fuel use sta?s?cs at the na?onal level.

  • AirQ+ requires users to load their own data for the popula?on

studied:

  • Air quality (average levels or frequency of days with specific levels)
  • Popula?on (e.g., number of adults aged ≥ 30 years)
  • Health (e.g., baseline rates of health outcomes)
  • AirQ+ also enables users to load their own data for pollutants not

included in AirQ+ if RRs are available

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 22

  • Experiences of IHIA on air pollu?on
slide-23
SLIDE 23

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Burden of disease

  • Burden of disease (BoD)

– years of life lost (due to premature mortality) (YLL) – years lived with disability (YLD) (scaled using disability weights)

  • Followed by environmental burden (EBD)

– burden aiributable to defined risk factors

Hänninen, HIA & EBD 2017-02-06 26

BoD [DALY] =YLL + YLD EBD = PAF × BoD

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 26

Multiple exposures Multiple health endpoints Environmental burden

  • f disease (EBoD)
slide-27
SLIDE 27

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 27

Disability adjusted lifeyears (DALY)

Adopted from Guus de Hollander et al., 1999 Hänninen, Lehtomäki et al. 2016

1,0

Population

Childhood leukemia Pneumonia Progressive cardiovascular disease Untreated asthma

Age

Years lived with disability (YLD) Years of life lost (YLL) Healthy life years

Disability weight

0,5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Premature death

YLL

Years of life lost

DALY = AC×DW×L

DW L

slide-28
SLIDE 28

EBoD=PAF x BD

Three different methods (methods 1a, 2a, or 2b) were used to estimate the EBD, depending on the type of exposure–response function estimate available for each exposure–outcome pair [either an RR based on environmental epidemiology, or a unit risk (UR) based on toxicological or occupational data], and on the availability

  • f a WHO baseline burden of disease (BD) estimate for the outcome.

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Environmental Burden of Disease in Europe (EBoDE) -project

2017-02-06 29

Finland Germany Netherlands Belgium France Italy

hip://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-245-413-3 hip://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1206154/ Hänninen O, Knol A, Jantunen M, Lim T-A, Conrad A, Rappolder M, Carrer P, FaneD A-C, Kim R, Buekers J, Torfs R, Iavarone I, Classen T, Hornberg C, Mekel O, and the EBoDE Group, 2014. Environmental burden of disease in Europe: Assessing nine risk factors in six countries. Environmental Health Perspec?ves: 122(5):439-446. DOI:10.1289/ehp.1206154 Hänninen O, Knol A (eds.), Jantunen M, Kollanus V, Leino O, Happonen E, Lim T-A, Conrad A, Rappolder M, Carrer P, FaneD A-C, Kim R, Prüss- Üstün A, Buekers J, Torfs R, Iavarone I, Comba P, Classen T, Hornberg C, Mekel O, 2011. European perspecCves on Environmental Burden of Disease; EsCmates for nine stressors in six countries. THL Reports 1/2011, Helsinki, Finland. 86 pp + 2 appendixes. ISBN 978-952-245-413-3

Hänninen, HIA & EBD Hänninen et al. 2014 Hänninen & Knol, 2011

Popula?on (millions) FI 5.2 NL 16 BE 10 DE 82 FR 61 IT 58 total 233 M 45% of EU (510 M)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

EBoDE Overall stressor comparison Six countries (BE, DE, FI, FR, IT, NL)

2017-02-06 Hänninen, HIA & EBD 30

PM2.5 68 %

SHS 8% Noise 8% Radon 7% Dioxins 4% Lead 4% Ozone 1% Benzene 0% Formaldehyde 0%

Non-discounted values Non-discounted values

Figure 1. Rela?ve contribu?on of the nine targeted stressorrisk factors to the burden of disease aiributed to these stressorrisk factors, average over the six par?cipa?ng countries.

Hänninen & Knol, 2011 Hänninen et al. 2014

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2017-02-06 Hänninen, HIA & EBD 31 Hänninen & Knol, 2011

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2017-02-06 32

Four BoD estimation methods

1 Epi (RR) 2 Unit risk

  • A. Top-down (PAF)
  • B. Boiom-up: BoD=n×DW×L

Hänninen, HIA & EBD

slide-33
SLIDE 33

EBoDE Overall stressor comparison - 6 countries (BE, DE, FI, FR, IT, NL)

PM2.5 68 %

SHS 8% Noise 8% Radon 7% Dioxins 4% Lead 4% Ozone 1% Benzene 0% Formaldehyde 0%

Non-discounted values Non-discounted values

69.4%

0% 0% 1.0% 3.6% 5.4% 6.4% 7.0% 7.2% 25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

EBoDE- Hanninen et al.

Range: 3% (Finland) – >6% (Italy)

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 35

Environmental burden of disease, Eur, 2012 (in DALYs)

26% 17% 25% 35% 27% 19% 25% 16% 12% 15% 44% 62% 15% 20% 20%

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

25/04/18 School on IEHIA on air pollu?on and climate change in Mediterranean urban seDngs 36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

2017-02-06 37

EBoDE: Magnitude of public health impact

  • vs. uncertainCes

High Medium Low Public health impact

Par?culate air pollu?on

(4500-10 000)

Second hand smoke

(600-1200)

Traffic noise

(400-1500)

Lead

(100-900)*

Ozone

(30-140)

Radon

(450-1100)

Dioxins

(200-600)

Formaldehyde

(0-2)*

Benzene

(2-4)

Numerical values indicate non-discounted DALYs per million people in the six par?cipa?ng countries. * a numerical model has been used to es?mate threshold exceedances.

High Medium Low Certainty of the assessment

Non-discounted values

Hänninen, HIA & EBD

Figure 2. Contribu?on of the nine selected environmental stressor risk factors to the burden of disease (DALY/M) as popula?on weighted average over the six countries.

Hänninen & Knol, 2011 Hänninen et al. 2014 Stressors with cancer relevance

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Going back to our example on landfills

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Example 2: Use of large rou?ne data

Example on Waste-related exposure: how calculate EBD related to exposure to landfills in Europe

  • Yesterday
  • Number of exposed people using European databases
  • GIS approach to exposure assessment
  • Today
  • Use RR from literature and
  • Calcula?on of AC (Aiributable Cases)
  • Combina?on of different health outcomes in one analysis using DALYs
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Outline

Example on how calculate EBD related to exposure to landfills in your country

  • Use RR from literature and
  • Number of exposed people using European

databases

– GIS approach to exposure assessment

  • Calcula?on of AC (aiributable cases)
  • Combina?on of different health outcomes in
  • ne analysis using DALYs
slide-41
SLIDE 41

General formula for the calcula?on of aiributable cases: AC = AFexp * Ratepopgen * Popexp where: AC = aiributable cases; AFexp = aiributable frac?on in exposed people (RR – 1) / RR; Ratepopgen = background popula?on incidence rate (proxy of rate in unexposed people) Popexp = exposed people ATTRIBUTABLE CASES

slide-42
SLIDE 42

DALYs

  • Disability Adjusted Life Years

DALYs = AC * DW * L

where:

  • AC = aiributable cases;
  • DW=Disability Weight
  • L= disease dura?on

*

Mortality=1 Cancer=0.44/12.6 y Respiratory symptoms=0.08 Low Birth Weight = 0.106/ 79.6 years Congenital Anomalies = 0.17 / 79.6 years Annoyance = 0.03

*source: Victorian Burden of Disease

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Data collec?on

  • Loca?on of plants
  • Popula?on database
  • European health sta?s?cs
  • Rela?ve risks
slide-44
SLIDE 44

AF - data from literature

Exposure buffer Exopsure index Health outcome Risk Ref.

2 km Distance Congenital anomalies RR=1.02 (99%CI=1.01-1.03) Ellioi et al. 2001 Annoyance from odour 5.4% Herr et al. 2003 Low birth weight 1.06 (99%CI=1.052-1.062) Ellioi et al. 2001 5 km H2S (model) Respiratory diseases 1.09 (95%CI=1.00-1.19) Golini et al. 2016

slide-45
SLIDE 45

E-PRTR data

slide-46
SLIDE 46

*.MKZ

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Health for All Database

(hip://data.euro.who.int/hfadb/)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Health for All Database

(hip://data.euro.who.int/hfadb/)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Final dataset for exercise

  • Each row represent a member State

Variables in columns:

  • CountryName: name of the country;
  • Buffer: radius of the buffer used to calculate exposed

popula?on

  • PopulaEon: total popula?on living within buffers (eg 4 km)
  • RespRate: background popula?on respiratory disease rate
  • Birthrate: rate of births on total popula?on
  • Perc_LBW: percentage of low birth weight on total births
  • RR_resp: rela?ve risk for respiratory diseases
  • RR_LBW: rela?ve risk for low birth weight
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Input file

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Instruc?ons for exercise

  • Work on Italy row and another country row
  • Create a new column and calculate total births,

using informa?on on birth rate

  • Calculate AF using RR column
  • Create new columns for AC_lbw and AC_resp
  • Calculate AC_lbw and AC_resp using the formula:

AC = AFexp * Ratepopgen * Popexp

  • Create new columns for DALYs
  • Calculate DALYs using the formula:

DALYs = AC * DW * L

slide-52
SLIDE 52

20 minutes for…

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Variables you have to create

DecripCon Formula Births: exposed people for LBW

  • utcome (number of births)

total popula?on * birth rate AF_resp: aiributable frac?on for respiratory disease (RR_resp – 1)/RR_resp AF_LBW: aiributable frac?on for low birth weigth (RR_LBW – 1)/RR_LBW AC_resp: aiributable cases for respiratory diseases AF_resp*Resprate* popula?on AC_LBW: aiributable cases for low birth weight AF_LBW*(perc_LBW/ 100)*Births DALYs: total number of DALYs for both health outcomes Resp: DW=0.08 ;L=1 LBW: DW=0.1 06;L=79.6

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Output file

Exp_LBW AF_resp AF_LBW AC_resp AC_LBW DALYs 24083 0.082569 0.056604 2548 98 1032

slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57

DISCUSSION

  • Strenghts
  • Weakness