International Institutions and Crisis Resolution Class 2 - August 6 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

international institutions and crisis resolution
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

International Institutions and Crisis Resolution Class 2 - August 6 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

International Institutions and Crisis Resolution Class 2 - August 6 Plan for Today Quiz 1 Review of Theories on Institutions and Legalization Break Applying work on institutions to international political crises.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

International Institutions and Crisis Resolution

Class 2 - August 6

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plan for Today

  • Quiz 1
  • Review of Theories on Institutions and

Legalization

  • Break
  • Applying work on institutions to international

political crises.

  • Simulation expectations and country selection
  • Syria Vice documentary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Institutions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Institution

A structure or mechanism that governs behavior within a community and mediates rules that govern behavior. Examples?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

International Institutions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

International Institutions

Structure or mechanism that governs behavior in the international community. Examples?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Issues dealt with by institutions

  • Domestic: security, education, public safety,

economic inefficiency, etc.

  • International: security, economic

inefficiency, protectionism, lack of common standards/regulation, lack of human rights, genocide, etc.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What types of problems should international institutions solve?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What types of problems should international institutions solve?

  • Coordination
  • Common-pool
  • Core value
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Coordination Problems

  • Rules to assure

common standards.

  • Mutually beneficial.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Common pool problems

  • Exhaustible, but non-

divisible resources.

  • Institutions would

prevent exhaustion.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Core value problems

  • Problems affecting

basic rights established by international system.

  • Institutions would

uphold rights; punish violators.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Trade-off: Effectiveness and Sovereignty

  • To empower international institutions, states

must give up some authority over their own affairs.

  • Unwillingness to cede sovereignty often

leads international institutions to be weak and ineffective.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Strengthening IOs: Legalization

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Strengthening IOs: Legalization

  • Three dimensions:
  • Obligation - are states bound by

commitments?

  • Precision - do rules unambiguously

define authorized or proscribed conduct?

  • Delegation - are third parties granted

authority to implement, interpret or apply rules?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Obligation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Precision

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Delegation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Variation on the three dimensions determines institutional strength.

  • IOs strong along all three dimensions are

considered “Hard Law.”

○ i.e. the European Union.

  • IOs that lack strength along all three

dimensions do not alter the default state of “Anarchy”

○ G8, G20, World Economic Forum.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Simulation Preview:

Details after the break. Goal: as representatives of a group of countries, create new legal institutions as a way of dealing with crises. Part of assignment is to create proposals for potential agreement

slide-21
SLIDE 21

International Institutions and Crisis Bargaining

Can they have an effect?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

How can legalization be applied to respond to international crises?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

How can legalization be applied to respond to international crises?

  • Rules can be developed to resolve both

common pool and core value crises:

○ Montreal Protocol (1987) to ban CFCs for damaging

  • zone layer.

○ Third party monitoring to prevent interstate disputes from escalating to war.

  • Required: ceding sovereignty to international

institutions.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

What do institutions actually do to defuse crises?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What do institutions actually do to defuse crises?

  • Not very much.
  • The UN is designed to gather the world’s

powers to diffuse threats to global peace.

  • In practice, the UNSC is generally

deadlocked because of the ‘Big Five.’

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Interventions by NATO, EU

  • Can be more effective

in terms of action.

○ i.e. Kosovo, Afghanistan.

  • Seen as biased toward

narrow Western interests.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What problems arise in coming together to solve crises? For which crises

slide-28
SLIDE 28

What problems arise in coming together to solve crises? For which crises

  • Domestic pressure

○ i.e. oil companies against climate change action.

  • Preservation of sovereignty.

○ US refuses to join ICC.

  • National security interests.

○ Allegedly: US in lead-up to Iraq War in 2003.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

UNSC and 2003 Iraq War

  • Why can’t security council agree to use force

against Iraq?

  • Why does the US act unilaterally? Are there

consequences?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Background

  • Axis of Evil speech

identifies Iraq, Iran and North Korea.

  • Iraq ruled by Saddam

Hussein.

○ Regime harbored Islamist terrorists. ○ Developed weapons of mass destruction. ○ Poised for aggression against the US.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Background II

Buuuut....

  • Saddam’s Islamist connection was to fight

Kurdish rebellion.

  • Regime had not developed WMDs since end
  • f first Gulf War.
  • Regime was secular, crippled by sanctions,

had no intent to attack US.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

US came to UN for force authorization

  • Claimed Saddam had violated UN’s previous

resolutions, should be removed.

  • Initial resolution passed in November 2002.
  • Further resolutions failed, were blocked by

France, Russia and China. Why?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

In March of 2003...

slide-34
SLIDE 34

US invasion was against UN Charter. What were the consequences on its international standing? Why?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

US invasion was against UN Charter. What were the consequences on its international standing? Why?

  • US was (is?) global hegemon.
  • The UN Charter was not binding

international law.

○ Veto power gives Big Five universal guaranteed opt-

  • ut.
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Was Iraq invasion an international political crisis?

Yes? No?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Simulation Expectations

Tutorial 2

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Structure

  • Each person gives 3-5 minute pre-prepared

proposal as representative of their country. (50%)

  • Followed by discussion session, where

representatives can challenge proposals made by others (30%).

  • 20% is to take assignment seriously!
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Your role

  • You will be a representative from a chosen

country (out of 10), attending a summit to resolve a crisis.

  • The goal of the summit is to create a durable

solution to whatever crisis is taking place.

  • Your proposal to add to the solution should

be from the perspective of your country, as should how you behave at the summit.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Proposals

  • Make proposals that are:

○ Likely to be adopted. ○ Help resolve the crisis. ○ Benefit your country. ○ Impede proposals that don’t benefit your country or benefit your rivals.

  • You can coordinate ONLY with those

countries that it’s plausible for you to coordinate with.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Class 3 Simulation:

Syrian Civil War spillover:

  • Refugee crisis in Lebanon and Jordan

escalates to conflict between refugees and host countries.

  • Summit organized by UNSC Big Five, Saudi

Arabia, Turkey, Germany, Italy and Japan.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Your job is to address three issues:

  • Food and housing aid distributed to

refugees.

  • Status of refugees as residents of Lebanon,

Turkey and Jordan.

  • Legal pathways to asylum in developed

countries, such as EU, US or Japan to alleviate demographic pressure.