INVESTIGATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS WITH STRUCTURAL WALLS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investigation on the performance of buildings with
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

INVESTIGATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS WITH STRUCTURAL WALLS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INVESTIGATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS WITH STRUCTURAL WALLS IN THE TOHOKU, JAPAN, EARTHQUAKE OF 2011 Toshikatsu Ichinose, Nagoya Institute of Technology Santiago Pujol, Purdue University Susumu Takahashi, Nagoya Institute of Technology


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INVESTIGATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS WITH STRUCTURAL WALLS IN THE TOHOKU, JAPAN, EARTHQUAKE OF 2011

Toshikatsu Ichinose, Nagoya Institute of Technology Santiago Pujol, Purdue University Susumu Takahashi, Nagoya Institute of Technology

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Severe damage of RC buildings with structural walls were
  • bserved.
  • Three retrofitted RC buildings are picked up and the

damage are investigated.

  • The reason of the damage and what happened during the

earthquake are discussed.

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Built in 1968
  • 6-story RC building
  • Retrofitted in 1997

6600 18800 5600 6600 3200 8000 8000 8000 8000 8000 8000 8000 56000

1st story plan

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Observed damage in longitudinal direction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Observed damage in longitudinal direction

15.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 10.0 1.5 1.5 10.0 5.0 1.0

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Limit analysis

A B C D

Σatσy

This frame has large strength. …But, coupling beams deform 5 times as much as walls.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A B B’ C D

15 1975 800

(mm)

1/910 1/620 1/790 1/540 1/1360 1/1410

Estimated deformation

15.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 6.0

slide-8
SLIDE 8

6th story plan

8000 56000 3000 6600 6000 6600 19200 3000 8000 8000 8000 8000 8000 8000

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 H I J K

  • Built in 1966
  • 8-story RC building
  • Retrofitted in 1996
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Observed damage in longitudinal direction

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Observed damage in transverse direction

2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F RF

600 280 430 D25 (#8)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Observed damage in transverse direction

2F 3F 4F 5F 6F 7F 8F RF

  • utside

window inside

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Observed damage in transverse direction Damage in left hand side was serious.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Reinforcement with carbon fiber

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pushover analysis

Large deformation In short beam

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Effect of Longitudinal Web Reinforcement Discontinuities on the Drift Capacity of Structural Walls

Ying Wang Santiago Pujol Purdue University

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Plan View (stories: 1-2)

8m 6.75m

slide-19
SLIDE 19

8m 6.75m

Plan View (stories: 3-9)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

3.3m

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Earthquakes and Strengthening

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Miyagi Earthquake 1978

Shiga et al. (1981)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Strengthening in 2001

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tohoku Earthquake 2011

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Discontinuity (bottom of third story)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Tohoku Earthquake 2011

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

Displacement Response (m) Period (sec)

1978NS-2%Damping 2011NS-2%Damping

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Hypothesis

Discontinuity

( longitudinal web reinforcement )

Strain Concentration

Decrease in drift capacity

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Experimental Program

2' 10" 3'-9" 10"

Specimens 2,5 and 6 Specimens 1,3 and 4

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Experimental Program

10"

lbe = 2" tbe = 4"

2" 1" 1"

tw = 2" lbe = 2" lw = 6"

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

5 10 15 20 25 30 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 Height (in) Maximum Tensile Unit Strain

Tensile Strain Distribution at a Drift Ratio of 3%

No Cutoffs Cutoffs

slide-35
SLIDE 35

No Cutoffs Cutoffs

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Hypothesis

Discontinuity

( longitudinal web reinforcement )

Strain Concentration

Decrease in drift capacity toughness