IPv6 Deployment Survey (Residential/Household Services) How IPv6 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
IPv6 Deployment Survey (Residential/Household Services) How IPv6 is being deployed? Jordi Palet (jordi.palet@consulintel.es) Consulintel, CEO/CTO - 1 Survey Contents Basic ISP data (name, country, RIR) Technology of the customer
Jordi Palet (jordi.palet@consulintel.es) Consulintel, CEO/CTO
IPv6 305 37% IPv4 514 63%
IP version of Survey Responder
IPv6 IPv4
AfriNIC 16 2% APNIC 154 19% ARIN 181 22% LACNIC 125 15% RIPE NCC 343 42%
RIR
AfriNIC APNIC ARIN LACNIC RIPE NCC
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Belgium Bhutan Brazil Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Czech Republic Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Grenada Guatemala Hong Kong Hungary Iran Iraq Ireland Italy Japan Jordan Kuwait Lithuania Luxembourg Malaysia Mexico Mozambique Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua North Korea Norway Oman Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Serbia Singapore Slovenia South Africa Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Tunisia Turkey Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Venezuela Wallis and Futuna Yemen 2 2 2 1 10 1 36 1 1 3 6 2 40 1 12 2 1 7 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 3 17 24 5 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 7 4 2 13 1 33 2 1 8 3 1 1 2 5 2 1 1 4 11 2 2 1 4 2 14 1 7 6 2 2 2 1 2 2 26 93 2 5 1 3
2G/3G/4G with CPE 4 1% Cable/DOCSIS 102 22% FTTH 145 31% Other 50 11% Wireless (WiFi, LMDS, WiMax, ...) 44 10% xDSL 118 25%
Technology
2G/3G/4G with CPE Cable/DOCSIS FTTH Other Wireless (WiFi, LMDS, WiMax, ...) xDSL
N/A 374 46% No 147 18% Yes 298 36%
Is IPv6 already a commercial service?
N/A No Yes
/112 6 2% /126 9 3% /127 21 7% /64 203 62% Other 47 14% unnumbered 39 12%
WAN Prefix Size
/112 /126 /127 /64 Other unnumbered
N/A 535 65% No 101 12% Yes 183 23%
WAN Prefix Stable
N/A No Yes
GUA 194 64% link-local 65 21% Other 9 3% ULA 37 12%
WAN Addressing Type
GUA link-local Other ULA
N/A 663 81% No 93 11% Yes 63 8%
WAN from same pool as customer prefixes
N/A No Yes N/A 759 93% No 20 2% Yes 39 5%WAN /64 from customer prefix
N/A No Yes /48 71 23% /56 121 39% /64 90 29% Other 30 9%
LAN Prefix Size
/48 /56 /64 Other
N/A 536 65% No 104 13% Yes 179 22%
LAN Prefix Stable
N/A No Yes
N/A 728 89% No 49 6% Yes 42 5%
Can the customer opt to have it "stable"?
N/A No Yes
N/A 779 95% No 25 3% Yes 15 2%
Extra cost (on top of stable IPv4)?
N/A No Yes
N/A 498 61% No 9 1% Yes 312 38%
IPv4 service provided?
N/A No Yes
N/A 525 64% No 34 4% Yes 260 32%
Public IPv4 address at CPE WAN?
N/A No Yes
N/A 532 65% No 132 16% Yes 155 19%
IPv4 address is "stable"?
N/A No Yes
N/A 694 85% No 36 4% Yes 88 11%
Can the customer opt to have IPv4 "stable"?
N/A No Yes N/A 732 90% No 12 1% Yes 74 9%Extra cost for stable IPv4?
N/A No Yes 464XLAT 3 1% 6RD 7 3% 6to4 5 2% CGN (dual-stack with private IPv4 + GUA) 25 9% DS-LITE 9 3% Dual-stack (public IPv4 + GUA) 214 75% lw4o6 1 0% MAP-T 1 0% NAT64 3 1% Other 13 5% Tunnel Broker 3 1%
What transition mechanism?
464XLAT 6RD 6to4 CGN (dual-stack with private IPv4 + GUA) DS-LITE Dual-stack (public IPv4 + GUA) lw4o6 MAP-T NAT64 Other Tunnel Broker
N/A 590 72% No 130 16% Yes 99 12%
IPv6 reverse DNS?
N/A No Yes
N/A 630 77% No 80 10% Yes 109 13%
NS Delegation for stable IPv6 prefix?
N/A No Yes
N/A 704 86% No 98 12% Yes 17 2%
DNAME for non-stable IPv6 prefix for PTRs?
N/A No Yes
– Some exceptions
technology/marketing/other reason:
– IPv6 prefix size – Stability of prefix
”misunderstandings”
– Jordi Palet (Consulintel): jordi.palet@consulintel.es