JOINT ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT SE DIVISION Cooperative Enforcement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
JOINT ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT SE DIVISION Cooperative Enforcement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Assistant Commander Brandi Reeder Law Enforcement Division - Fisheries Law Administrator JOINT ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT SE DIVISION Cooperative Enforcement Program Joint Enforcement Agreement One of the most effective programs in NOAAs
Cooperative Enforcement Program Joint Enforcement Agreement
One of the most effective programs in NOAA’s Office of Law Enforcement (OLE) is the Cooperative Enforcement Program which utilizes Joint Enforcement Agreements (JEAs), an
- perational plan, between NMFS and state
agencies. State partner agencies provide fully trained, equipped and deputized officers who perform at- sea and dockside patrols, outreach, and public education serving as a force multiplier for the OLE.
The Cooperative Enforcement Program, through JEAs, leverages state assets to enforce federal priorities while providing states funding which enables operation and the purchase of necessary equipment. Approximately $16 million has been made annually for the JEAs which provides funding for the State partners to support Federal fishery enforcement activities.
JEAs officially started in 2002. Twenty-seven coastal states and territories have entered into JEA partnerships with NMFS and are receiving JEA funds. The JEA program has been particularly effective because state agents are familiar with local waters, know when and where enforcement infractions are likely to occur, and provide
- pportunities for significant public outreach and
education.
JEAs have led to significant progress in creating identifying regional and local fishery enforcement priorities and extending coordination to other areas, such as investigations. In addition, JEAs ensure visibility and routine interaction with the regulated industry, ensure stakeholders understanding, establish enforcement in EEZ, and ultimately achieve prevention with resource user group support and compliance with Federal marine resource conservation mission.
Alabama DCNR
- Recreational anglers 4,592
- Commercial anglers 773
- Vessels 1,808
- Patrol hours 2,857
- Arrests/warnings 260
- Cases referred for federal prosecution 11
- TED Boardings
265
- Outreach hours 566
Alabama DCNR
- Direct purchases:
– Four wheel drive patrol trucks – Hand held thermal Imaging devices – Outboard engines – Repair of JEA patrol vessels
Mississippi DMR
- Commercial Anglers
253
- Recreational Anglers 1242
- Dealers Inspected
35
- Charter Vessels Inspected
33
- Federal Violations
6
- State Violations
47
- Public Outreach Contacts 9380
Mississippi DMR
- Patrols
206
- Man Hours
2752
- Vessel Hours – Near Shore
652
- Vessel Hours – Mid Range
688
- Vessel Hours – Long Range
39
- Dockside Patrol Hours
483
FLORIDA FWC
- Public Outreach Hours
281
- Documented Violations
1,028
- Resource Citations Issued
266
- Resource Warnings Issued
762
- Processors Inspections
467
- Wholesalers Inspections
82
- Dealers Inspections
22
- Markets
16
- Public Contacts (Comm/Rec)
2881
FLORIDA FWC
- Near-shore Patrol Hours
1,874
- JEA Patrol Personnel Hours (At Sea)
17,974
- JEA Patrol Personnel Hours (Dockside) 8,051
- Total JEA Vessel Patrol Hours
9,215
- Total JEA Patrols
1,944
Louisiana DWF
- Recreational Contacts 3,095
- Commercial Contacts 1,258
- Patrol Hours Total 10,068
– Commercial – 6818
- 1977 Dockside
- 2279 At Sea personnel, 2628 Vessel hours
– Recreational – 3250
- 1774 At Sea personnel
- 1476 Vessel Hours
FY 2015-2016 Observed Compliance
LDWF Keeping a Watchful Eye on Commercial Activities
Inspection Vessels % # Cited Inspected % REEF FISH INSPECTION 32 439 7.29% REEF FISH 5 32 84.38% HIGHLY MIGRATORY INSPECTION 17 439 3.87% HIGHLY MIGRATORY 4 17 76.47% COASTAL MIGRATORY INSPECTION 104 439 23.69% COASTAL MIGRATORY 8 104 92.31% SHRIMP INSPECTION 288 439 65.60% SHELLFISH 6 288 97.92% RED DRUM INSPECTION 4 439 0.91% RED DRUM 4 100.00% FISHERIES NON-DESIGNATED 45 439 10.25% FEDERAL OTHER 45 100.00% Inspection Vessels % # Cited Inspected % REEF FISH INSPECTION 188 357 52.66% REEF FISH 1 188 99.47% HIGHLY MIGRATORY INSPECTION 154 357 43.14% HIGHLY MIGRATORY 154 100.00% COASTAL MIGRATORY INSPECTION 215 357 60.22% COASTAL MIGRATORY 6 215 97.21% SHRIMP INSPECTION 302 357 84.59% SHELLFISH 6 302 98.01% RED DRUM INSPECTION 84 357 23.53% RED DRUM 84 100.00% FISHERIES NON-DESIGNATED 173 357 48.46% FEDERAL OTHER 173 100.00% DOCKSIDE VIOLATIONS
FMP's
COMMERCIAL VIOLATIONS
COMMERICAL VESSEL Observed Compliance FMP's DOCKSIDE Oberserved Compliance
Note: Vessels identified as Participating in FMP
DOCKSIDE/DEALER Inspection FMP's COMMERCIAL Vessel Inspection Breakdown FMP's
LDWF Keeping a Watchful Eye on Recreational Activities
FY 2015-2016 Observed Compliance
Inspection Vessels % # Cited Inspected! % REEF FISH INSPECTION 500 920 54.35% REEF FISH 100 500 80.00% HIGHLY MIGRATORY INSPECTION 170 920 18.48% HIGHLY MIGRATORY 8 170 95.29% COASTAL MIGRATORY INSPECTION 498 920 54.13% COASTAL MIGRATORY 5 498 99.00% SHRIMP INSPECTION 8 920 0.87% SHELLFISH 8 100.00% RED DRUM INSPECTION 405 920 44.02% RED DRUM 4 405 99.01% FISHERIES NON-DESIGNATED 188 920 20.43% FEDERAL OTHER 31 188 83.51% Inspection Vessels % # Cited Inspected! % REEF FISH INSPECTION 42 82 51.22% REEF FISH 1 42 97.62% HIGHLY MIGRATORY INSPECTION 37 82 45.12% HIGHLY MIGRATORY 1 37 97.30% COASTAL MIGRATORY INSPECTION 41 82 50.00% COASTAL MIGRATORY 41 100.00% SHRIMP INSPECTION 82 0.00% RED DRUM 41 100.00% RED DRUM INSPECTION 41 82 50.00% FEDERAL OTHER 4 11 63.64% FISHERIES NON-DESIGNATED 11 82 13.41% FMP's
- REC. VESSEL OBSERVED COMPLIANCE
FMP's CHARTER VESSEL OBSERVED COMPLIANCE RECREATIONAL VIOLATIONS CHARTER VIOLATIONS
FMP's
RECREATION Inspection Breakdown
FMP's
Note: Vessels identified as Participating in FMP CHARTER Vessel Inspection
Texas Parks and Wildlife – Law Enforcement Division
- Recreational anglers 2,712
- Commercial anglers 1,642
- Dealers Inspected 165
- Vessels 1,808
- Patrol hours 8,582
- Arrests/warnings 347
- TED Boardings
1,188
- Outreach Contacts 5,983
Texas Parks and Wildlife – Law Enforcement Division
Units Unit Costs: Total Cost: 2 $34,895.00 $69,790.00 1 $34,557.42 $34,557.42 6 $13,593.58 $81,561.48 2 $73,000 $146,000 1 $13,560.58 $13,560.58 1 $12,305.00 $24,610,00 1 $1,695.00 $1,695.00 $371,774.48 Vessel Rigging Equipment Grand total: Item: Tran Sport Boat XLR8 25’ w/ trailer Tran Sport Boat XLR8 23’ Outboard motor 250 hp Shallow Sport Boat 25’ Outboard motor 250L hp Outboard motor 225 hp
TOTAL Patrol Hours 54087 Commercial Fishermen Inspected 3554 Recreational Fishermen Inspected 10487 Public Contacts (comm + rec) 16922 Outreach Contacts 15363 Dealers Inspected 320 Public Outreach Hours 1101 Violations 1671 Gulfwide Totals
Leveraging Partnerships
Eighth Coast Guard District
LMR Enforcement Update
January 2017
THE OVERALL CLASSIFICATION OF THIS BRIEFING IS:
UNCLASSIFIED
(U) The Lancha Threat
(U) Lancha sighted by USCG aircraft north of the MBL. (U) Source: USCG (U) Lancha sighted by USCG aircraft north of the MBL. (U) Source: USCG
- (U) Problem Set
– (U) Lanchas are known to operate north of the Maritime Boundary Line (MBL) on a regular basis – (U) There is no legitimate reason for a lancha to operate north of the MBL
Problem Area (5,000 Square Miles) US/MEX MBL
(U) Document and Media Exploitation (DOMEX) and Lancha Detections/Seizures
Lancha Seizure Lancha Sighting GPS Posits
Lancha Detections/Seizures (FY08-FY17)
Through 31 December 2016
Slide
45 53 51 63 108 124 160 199 176 31 9 13 9 22 22 35 33 39 45 8 50 100 150 200 250 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Detections Seizures
- (U) US Fishery Impact Estimate
– (U) Estimated 1,130 lancha incursions/year – (U) Optimal catch for one lancha is 800 – 1,200 lbs/day – (U) Larger lanchas are known to catch upwards of 3,000 lbs/day – (U) 780,000 lbs of red snapper poached from US waters by lanchas – (U) 30-31 MAR 16: 7 lanchas sighted, 5 seized containing 2,589 red snapper; new 24-hour record – (U) Economic impact to the US red snapper industry is estimated to be $3.9 - $11.7 million USD/year
(U) Lancha Incursions
* Note: Items in red were derived from a forecast model developed by two independent, academic studies. Due to several factors, it is likely the model is underestimating the actual magnitude of illegal MEX lancha operations.
(U) The images above depict catch and gear seized from three separate lancha interdictions. (U) Source: USCG UNCLAS UNCLAS//FOUO UNCLAS New 24 Hour Record
(U)Domestic Violations
New 24 Hour Record
F/V FOOTPRINT:
- 48 Red Snapper discovered in the fish hold
(many under legal size limit).
- No federal fishing permit nor IFQ for red
snapper (recreational season also currently closed).
- Three BRD violations identified: openings were
< 5” requirement.
- Two TED violations identified: > 4” gap on grid
structure & > 24” flap extended below grid. RECREATIONAL CABIN CRUISER
- 171 Red Snapper discovered onboard.
Owner/operator stated they caught the Red Snapper 25 NM offshore. Recreational season in Federal Waters is closed.
UNCLAS